This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?)

From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, aph at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:03:15 -0500
Subject: Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?)
References: <CAD_=9DRyUaR61=A0q0=3aLUOyNcpgjfqdizoULP1p3d7H2tjag@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=Sn1kjAOkpTdgibK4q8LuycaWuxc7VfajXQainznrbzk3F5A@mail.gmail.com> <50AFE727.8020208@redhat.com> <CAD_=9DS50jicRPYK-F+WSFGFswbd9y0=Pz4g7R2_+uqi4RQB-g@mail.gmail.com> <20121123212720.1C00433C87@vlsi1.gnat.com> <CAD_=9DQZ-B1jbEeRWh6AY1veAjGaXKq_AmOQscd1-9BmSbk_WA@mail.gmail.com> <20121123214138.EB64B33C87@vlsi1.gnat.com> <CAD_=9DQm+12Wv1jLpSKxGXrBbWBSaJbKHAcF70UzNS_5jieRfg@mail.gmail.com> <20121123220058.9A67933C87@vlsi1.gnat.com> <CAD_=9DTjTeqbSxuvjCO8MA0JR+pWpJ4XQ1qp7KAkp1Q2nVQGpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc1vczUie0L-aesaXmC5zVFT1jBOyKMdWu8u3QoLbmzmJQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121125104743.5rgjbc06808444wg-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <CAFiYyc2dvE2LQMyx8cUO8D221h3JuXLw1-Fc+_vfJ4+np8_Nsw@mail.gmail.com>

Quoting Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:

(though doesn't save much space).  One file per mail is then convenient for
review anyway.


That would be 84 mails then just for the added files.
And if the testsuite was bigger, that figure would only get larger.
Is that really the preferred way to do this?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?)
  - From: Richard Biener

References:
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?
  - From: Richard Biener
- Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?)
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?)
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]