Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype

[Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>]

I agree with the analysis of Uday and Basile.  In my view, competition
from Clang and LLVM is probably the best thing that could've happened
to a compiler that was in danger of becoming fat, lazy and complacent.
Simplifying the code base for new contributors and increased
maintainability are the main motivators for the cleanup efforts of the
last few months (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ImprovementProjects).

However, let's discuss this topic in some other thread, please.  I'd
like to take this thread back to the original topic: what do we do
with GC and PCH?


Thanks.  Diego.