gcc archive
date index for November, 2012

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2012
22:52 gcc-4.6-20121130 is now available gccadmin
13:56 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Gabriel Dos Reis

November 29, 2012
19:52 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.11 David Malcolm
18:12 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Benjamin Kosnik
18:01 Re: Chromium ISSUE with GCC 4.8 Paolo Carlini
17:31 Chromium ISSUE with GCC 4.8 awarecons
17:04 Failure to vectorize widen mult through intermediate steps Paulo Matos
10:50 DRIVER_SELF_SPECS and multilib gnubie gnubie
02:53 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Gabriel Dos Reis
01:08 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Lawrence Crowl
00:59 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:41 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Miles Bader
00:19 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Gabriel Dos Reis

November 28, 2012
21:51 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Douglas Gregor
21:30 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Jonathan Wakely
21:14 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Jonathan Wakely
20:17 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Toon Moene
15:56 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
15:45 Re: libstdc++-v3 without exception/exception segments Jonathan Wakely
15:19 libstdc++-v3 without exception/exception segments Martin Laabs
14:28 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Richard Kenner
14:22 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
13:53 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
11:08 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Richard Biener
10:54 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
10:30 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Richard Biener
10:28 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Andrew Haley
09:04 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Jonathan Wakely
07:36 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Xinliang David Li
07:07 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
07:05 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Xinliang David Li
06:41 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
05:08 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Miles Bader
02:02 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
01:34 Re: stupid build error Joseph S. Myers
01:26 Re: stupid build error Mike Stump
01:17 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Xinliang David Li
00:50 Re: stupid build error Joseph S. Myers
00:38 бесподобное средство для убиранию kг 1 мес. helen
00:21 ING Direct - Your statement is ready! (11/27/2012) ING Direct
00:20 Re: stupid build error Mike Stump
00:12 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner

November 27, 2012
23:51 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
23:48 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
23:34 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Eric Botcazou
23:26 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Jeff Law
23:23 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
23:14 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
22:51 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
21:25 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Andrew Pinski
21:23 Re: stupid build error Andrew Pinski
21:23 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
20:55 stupid build error Mike Stump
19:49 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Paolo Carlini
19:20 Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
16:00 RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
15:28 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Richard Biener
15:20 Re: --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats broken in trunk? Diego Novillo
15:15 --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats broken in trunk? Paolo Bonzini
15:06 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
14:58 Help with target hook TARGET_INIT_LIBFUNCS Rohit Arul Raj
14:54 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Tom Tromey
13:03 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
10:03 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Richard Biener
09:27 Re: Hash table iterators. Richard Biener
05:07 Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target? Greg McGary
04:58 Re: embedded Linux: improvement issues Maxim Kuvyrkov
03:51 embedded Linux: improvement issues ETANI NORIKO
00:06 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck

November 26, 2012
21:28 Re: GCC 4.7.2 error handling type short Paul_Koning
20:58 GCC 4.7.2 error handling type short Bill Beech (NJ7P)
20:57 Re: Hash table iterators. Lawrence Crowl
19:46 Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target? Maxim Kuvyrkov
18:55 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) DJ Delorie
17:49 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
16:30 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Richard Biener
16:03 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
15:35 Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target? Greg McGary
15:15 Re: Unused field in graphds.h struct graph? Richard Biener
15:03 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Richard Biener
14:52 The Linux binutils 2.23.51.0.6 is released H.J. Lu
12:36 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Martin Jambor
07:38 Here jkennedy19
06:33 Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target? Maxim Kuvyrkov
00:28 Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target? Greg McGary

November 25, 2012
22:57 gcc-4.8-20121125 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? NightStrike
19:52 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
19:44 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:07 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Xinliang David Li
17:29 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
16:04 Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?) Richard Biener
16:03 Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?) Joern Rennecke
15:56 Re: Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?) Richard Biener
15:47 Sumbitting 'patches' that add lots of files (Was: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?) Joern Rennecke
15:45 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Richard Biener
15:44 Re: Reorg a reorg.c comment John David Anglin
15:28 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
15:21 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
15:09 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Richard Biener
14:15 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Richard Biener
13:58 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Richard Biener
13:56 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Richard Biener
13:54 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Richard Biener
13:46 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Richard Biener
13:42 Re: Hash table iterators. Richard Biener
13:14 Re: Unused DSE Functions Richard Biener
13:07 Re: Unused components in sese.[hc]? Richard Biener
11:15 Re: a question for the c/c++ front end / standards people. Richard Biener
11:12 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Georg-Johann Lay
02:19 Reorg a reorg.c comment Steven Bosscher
02:06 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
01:53 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Daniel Berlin
01:35 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Diego Novillo
01:32 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo

November 24, 2012
22:52 gcc-4.7-20121124 is now available gccadmin
19:46 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
19:43 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
18:29 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Robert Dewar
18:13 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Jonathan Wakely
18:10 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Frank Ch. Eigler
18:08 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Robert Dewar
17:59 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Daniel Berlin
17:58 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Daniel Berlin
17:47 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Robert Dewar
17:14 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ian Lance Taylor
11:45 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Jonathan Wakely
00:40 RE: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Nathan Ridge

November 23, 2012
23:44 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Robert Dewar
22:55 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
22:49 gcc-4.6-20121123 is now available gccadmin
22:03 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
22:01 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Richard Kenner
21:55 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
21:41 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Richard Kenner
21:31 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
21:27 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Richard Kenner
21:22 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
21:14 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Andrew Haley
20:40 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
20:36 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
20:35 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
20:32 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
20:28 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
20:24 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Diego Novillo
20:14 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Ruben Safir
20:12 Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Andrew Pinski
16:15 Re: Hash table iterators. Andrew MacLeod
15:50 Re: Hash table iterators. Michael Matz
13:11 Limit reload base register class of define_memory_constraint Uros Bizjak
11:33 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Florian Weimer
10:50 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Joern Rennecke
10:17 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Joern Rennecke
10:15 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Florian Weimer
09:45 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Jonathan Wakely
06:37 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch

November 22, 2012
20:30 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Florian Weimer
19:06 Re: Hash table iterators. Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18 Hash table iterators. Lawrence Crowl
16:53 Stop for a minute albertogonzo
11:24 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Алексей Павлов
11:12 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Kai Tietz
11:11 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Алексей Павлов
09:39 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk niXman
09:23 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Kai Tietz
09:02 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Andreas Schwab
08:49 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk niXman
08:39 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk niXman
08:36 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Richard Earnshaw
08:36 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Алексей Павлов
08:30 Re: Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Kai Tietz
08:21 Always defined __SEH__ when build from trunk Алексей Павлов

November 21, 2012
22:47 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Ian Lance Taylor
21:20 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Paolo Bonzini
19:42 Re: RFC - Initial planning for next Cauldron workshop Ian Lance Taylor
19:39 [cxx-conversion] Merge from trunk rev 193681 Diego Novillo
19:38 Re: DWARF location descriptor and multi-register frame pointer Michael Eager
19:27 RFC - Initial planning for next Cauldron workshop Diego Novillo
19:02 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Ian Lance Taylor
17:28 removing forced labels triggers assertion in dwarf info generation Paulo Matos
16:56 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Paolo Bonzini
15:19 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
15:02 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Ian Lance Taylor
14:32 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
14:31 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Tobias Grosser
14:25 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
13:48 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Tobias Grosser
13:33 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
13:07 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Tobias Grosser
13:03 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Michael Matz
12:21 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
11:37 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Theodore Papadopoulo
11:20 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
11:18 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Gabriel Dos Reis
01:01 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Xinliang David Li
00:37 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Lawrence Crowl
00:20 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Xinliang David Li
00:16 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Lawrence Crowl
00:05 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
00:03 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo

November 20, 2012
23:59 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
22:29 Unused field in graphds.h struct graph? Lawrence Crowl
21:24 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Martin Jambor
21:03 Re: DWARF location descriptor and multi-register frame pointer Richard Henderson
19:34 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Xinliang David Li
19:33 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Basile Starynkevitch
19:28 Re: [wwwdocs] Release note entry for Function Multiversioning Sriraman Tallam
19:24 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Lawrence Crowl
19:20 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Lawrence Crowl
17:03 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Andrew MacLeod
16:49 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Andrew MacLeod
16:07 Re: Unused DSE Functions Michael Matz
15:23 Re: [wwwdocs] Release note entry for Function Multiversioning Gerald Pfeifer
12:55 Re: [Android] -fpic default option Alexander Ivchenko
11:30 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Bernd Schmidt
10:22 DWARF location descriptor and multi-register frame pointer Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
10:21 Re: Unused DSE Functions Steven Bosscher
09:53 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Steven Bosscher
08:59 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Eric Botcazou
06:15 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Uday Khedker
05:00 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Miles Bader
03:52 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Andrew MacLeod
02:31 Re: Unused DSE Functions Lawrence Crowl
02:08 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:45 Unused components in sese.[hc]? Lawrence Crowl
01:24 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Lawrence Crowl
00:56 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Lawrence Crowl

November 19, 2012
20:06 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Jonathan Wakely
19:36 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
15:19 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
15:18 Re: Unused Field in graphite-poly.h? Michael Matz
15:11 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Michael Matz
15:09 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
13:53 Implementing gcc pass - gcc crashes Srdjan Stipic
10:18 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Martin Jambor

November 18, 2012
22:54 gcc-4.8-20121118 is now available gccadmin
18:37 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Jonathan Wakely
18:32 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Jonathan Wakely
18:26 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
18:06 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype NightStrike
18:04 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
17:32 FWD: Gamal624
16:26 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
08:22 Re: [Android] -fpic default option Maxim Kuvyrkov

November 17, 2012
22:52 gcc-4.7-20121117 is now available gccadmin
19:42 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Gabriel Dos Reis
19:33 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Xinliang David Li
18:50 Re: [Android] -fpic default option Alexander Ivchenko
18:40 Re: *****SPAM***** Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Uday Khedker
17:57 Re: Add an option to bootstrap GCC with asan? H.J. Lu
17:57 Re: Add an option to bootstrap GCC with asan? Markus Trippelsdorf
17:37 Add an option to bootstrap GCC with asan? H.J. Lu
15:43 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Uday Khedker
15:04 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
12:03 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Richard Kenner
10:55 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Hans-Peter Nilsson
08:35 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
03:44 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Xinliang David Li
01:05 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Xinliang David Li
00:25 Unused Field in graphite-poly.h? Lawrence Crowl

November 16, 2012
22:53 gcc-4.6-20121116 is now available gccadmin
17:31 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Andrew Pinski
17:25 Re: [C++] Possible GCC bug Jiri Palecek
17:22 Re: [C++] Possible GCC bug Andrew Pinski
15:56 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Gabriel Dos Reis
15:42 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Andrew MacLeod
15:15 Re: [C++] Possible GCC bug Piotr Wyderski
15:13 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Ian Lance Taylor
14:30 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Michael Matz
14:22 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo
13:59 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Diego Novillo
13:15 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Diego Novillo
13:13 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Diego Novillo
13:10 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
13:08 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Diego Novillo
12:44 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Michael Matz
11:53 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Georg-Johann Lay
11:07 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Uday P. Khedker
10:23 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Laurynas Biveinis
10:07 Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
09:38 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Martin Jambor
09:23 Re: [C++] Possible GCC bug Dodji Seketeli
05:33 Re: expansion of vector shifts... David Miller
04:29 Re: [Android] -fpic default option Maxim Kuvyrkov
00:59 RFC - Alternatives to gengtype Diego Novillo

November 15, 2012
19:59 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Lawrence Crowl
19:34 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Lawrence Crowl
19:30 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Lawrence Crowl
18:23 Re: bootstrap comparison failure ppc64 FreeBSD Andreas Tobler
17:07 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Xinliang David Li
17:01 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Michael Matz
16:52 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:48 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Michael Matz
09:39 Re: [Android] -fpic default option Alexander Ivchenko
07:32 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Xinliang David Li
06:06 Re: Simplifying Gimple Generation Basile Starynkevitch
02:00 Re: [Android] -fpic default option H.J. Lu
01:49 Re: [Android] -fpic default option Maxim Kuvyrkov
01:49 Re: Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Andrew Pinski
01:13 Simplifying Gimple Generation Lawrence Crowl
01:12 Unifying the GCC Debugging Interface Lawrence Crowl

November 14, 2012
22:41 Re: Using -ffunction-sections and -p Jeff Law
21:10 Re: [C++] Possible GCC bug Jiri Palecek
20:57 Re: bootstrap comparison failure ppc64 FreeBSD Peter Bergner
20:32 Re: Using -ffunction-sections and -p Ian Lance Taylor
20:04 Re: Using -ffunction-sections and -p Jeff Law
20:01 Re: Using -ffunction-sections and -p Ian Lance Taylor
19:51 Re: [C++] Possible GCC bug Ulf Magnusson
18:58 Re: Using -ffunction-sections and -p Sriraman Tallam
18:34 Re: RFC: Updating boehm-gc to verion 7.2 (alpha 5) Matthias Klose
17:51 bootstrap comparison failure ppc64 FreeBSD Andreas Tobler
17:19 Re: RFH - VEC API overhaul - Need testers Diego Novillo
17:10 [C++] Possible GCC bug Piotr Wyderski
15:41 RFH - VEC API overhaul - Need testers Diego Novillo
14:27 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Ian Lance Taylor
14:06 Re: lto is streamable? Michael Matz
13:36 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Richard Earnshaw
13:26 [Android] -fpic default option Alexander Ivchenko
13:10 Re: lto is streamable? Diego Novillo
10:42 lto is streamable? Paulo Matos
10:17 Question on find_def_preds in tree-ssa-uninit.c Bin.Cheng
03:01 FYI UNITED NATIONS
01:18 [wwwdocs] Release note entry for Function Multiversioning Sriraman Tallam

November 13, 2012
15:05 Re: -fPIC -fPIE Ian Lance Taylor
15:00 Re: -fPIC -fPIE H.J. Lu
14:56 -fPIC -fPIE Ian Lance Taylor
03:18 Splitting asan.c up into two different pieces Andrew Pinski
03:12 Use of pretty-print inside asan.c Andrew Pinski

November 12, 2012
22:36 Re: Unused DSE Functions Diego Novillo
22:31 Re: Unused DSE Functions Lawrence Crowl
22:21 Unused DSE Functions Lawrence Crowl
19:14 The Linux binutils 2.23.51.0.5 is released H.J. Lu
02:01 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke

November 11, 2012
23:41 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Jonathan Wakely
22:56 gcc-4.8-20121111 is now available gccadmin
22:44 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke
22:37 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Eric Botcazou
21:57 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke
19:47 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Andrew Haley
18:25 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke
12:03 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Eric Botcazou
04:47 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) NightStrike

November 10, 2012
22:52 gcc-4.7-20121110 is now available gccadmin
22:19 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Jonathan Wakely
22:08 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Ryan Johnson
21:54 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Jonathan Wakely
21:40 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Ryan Johnson
20:51 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke
17:29 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Ryan Johnson
16:48 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Joseph S. Myers
16:21 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Andrew Haley
15:27 Re: Many vectorization failures on my x86_64 lto bootstrap. Toon Moene
14:53 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Eric Botcazou
12:08 Re: Many vectorization failures on my x86_64 lto bootstrap. Uros Bizjak
10:58 Many vectorization failures on my x86_64 lto bootstrap. Toon Moene
04:45 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) NightStrike
01:55 Re: What is wrong in this code? Ian Lance Taylor
01:41 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Paolo Bonzini
00:47 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke

November 09, 2012
23:08 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Eric Botcazou
22:53 gcc-4.6-20121109 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke
21:46 Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Eric Botcazou
21:35 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Bruno Nery
21:27 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Oleg Endo
21:23 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Bruno Nery
21:22 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Bruno Nery
20:37 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Oleg Endo
20:35 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Lars Gullik Bjønnes
20:34 What is wrong in this code? Angelo Graziosi
20:32 Re: [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Xinliang David Li
20:18 [rant?] g++ bug (missing uninitialized warning), bug reporting, bug searching Bruno Nery
19:52 the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10 Dennis Clarke
08:24 Özkerem Boya& Statik Toz Boya ve Lake iş leriniz yapılır ... Metin ÖZDEMİR

November 08, 2012
18:27 Re: Checking in on a Broken Math Resource Link on Your Site Jonathan Wakely
17:31 Re: Calling compiler from C program... Basile Starynkevitch
17:26 Re: Checking in on a Broken Math Resource Link on Your Site Andrew Haley
16:41 Calling compiler from C program... Johann Klammer
08:32 Re: New GCC takes 19x as long to compile my program (compared to old GCC), plus void** patch suggestion Anthony Foiani
08:02 about preprocessed code Alberto Lozano Alelu

November 07, 2012
22:30 Re: BSD licensed code OK in test suite? Oleg Endo
22:12 Re: BSD licensed code OK in test suite? Jeff Law
22:08 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
22:08 Re: BSD licensed code OK in test suite? Oleg Endo
21:59 Re: BSD licensed code OK in test suite? Jeff Law
21:48 BSD licensed code OK in test suite? Oleg Endo
21:46 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Arnaud Charlet
21:20 Checking in on a Broken Math Resource Link on Your Site Alexandra Sawyer
20:37 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
20:29 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
18:29 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
18:11 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
17:57 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
17:54 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
17:52 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
16:52 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Andrew Haley
16:12 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Robert Dewar
16:08 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
15:50 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Joseph S. Myers
15:03 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Robert Dewar
14:40 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
14:39 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
13:37 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
13:22 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
13:18 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
13:16 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Robert Dewar
13:13 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
13:02 Re: Fwd: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
13:02 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
12:51 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
12:45 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Richard Kenner
12:16 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Robert Dewar
12:04 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
11:27 RE: Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
11:24 Re: Defining scheduling resource constraint Bernd Schmidt
11:17 Re: Questions regarding licensing issues Robert Dewar
11:08 RE: Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
10:49 Questions regarding licensing issues nkavv
10:48 Re: Defining scheduling resource constraint Bernd Schmidt
10:42 RE: Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
08:08 Re: 32-bit PowerPC reference test platform David Brown
01:15 Re: 32-bit PowerPC reference test platform David Edelsohn

November 06, 2012
21:46 Hiya! I am looking for for man! Jerrome Sallustio
17:12 Re: Defining scheduling resource constraint Bernd Schmidt
16:51 RE: Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
16:08 Re: 32-bit PowerPC reference test platform Sebastian Huber
14:32 Re: 32-bit PowerPC reference test platform David Edelsohn
11:11 GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-11-06), Stage 1 is over, Stage 3 in effect immediately Jakub Jelinek
10:13 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars
09:59 Re: Question about aliases Jonathan Wakely
09:45 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Steven Bosscher
09:24 Question about aliases Alex Markin
09:21 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Jonathan Wakely
09:16 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Florian Weimer
08:30 32-bit PowerPC reference test platform Sebastian Huber
06:07 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Jeff Law
04:47 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Peter Bergner
02:57 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Easwaran Raman
02:43 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) DJ Delorie
02:00 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Diego Novillo
00:17 Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Ian Lance Taylor

November 05, 2012
23:46 Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC) Steven Bosscher
21:13 Re: a question for the c/c++ front end / standards people. Kenneth Zadeck
20:38 Re: a question for the c/c++ front end / standards people. Joseph S. Myers
20:30 Re: [help]failed to generate PHI NODE in esra pass. Handong Ye
18:20 Re: a question for the c/c++ front end / standards people. Kenneth Zadeck
18:08 Re: a question for the c/c++ front end / standards people. Ian Lance Taylor
18:02 a question for the c/c++ front end / standards people. Kenneth Zadeck
17:22 Precompiled header question Steve Ellcey
17:15 Re: Defining scheduling resource constraint Bernd Schmidt
17:12 RE: Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
17:05 RE: Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
17:00 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
16:52 Re: Defining scheduling resource constraint Bernd Schmidt
16:32 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon David Malcolm
16:32 Re: Defining scheduling resource constraint Joern Rennecke
14:51 Defining scheduling resource constraint Paulo Matos
14:48 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Jakub Jelinek
14:40 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Peter Bergner
13:59 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
13:32 Re: [help]failed to generate PHI NODE in esra pass. Martin Jambor
13:17 Re: [C++11] PR54413 Option for turning off compiler extensions for numeric literals. Paolo Carlini
13:15 Re: calculation of pi Jonathan Wakely
13:10 [C++11] PR54413 Option for turning off compiler extensions for numeric literals. Ed Smith-Rowland
12:53 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Jakub Jelinek
12:42 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Peter Bergner
11:31 Re: calculation of pi David Brown
10:33 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars
05:32 Re: [help]failed to generate PHI NODE in esra pass. Handong Ye
05:03 Re: Using -ffunction-sections and -p Ian Lance Taylor
04:55 Re: calculation of pi Ian Lance Taylor
04:04 Using -ffunction-sections and -p Sriraman Tallam
03:45 Re: LRA best_reload_nregs Vladimir Makarov
03:40 Re: LRA unaligned reloads Vladimir Makarov
00:57 çå: [help]failed to generate PHI NODE in esra pass. Yangyueming

November 04, 2012
23:26 Re: GCC Phoning Home Alexandre Oliva
22:58 gcc-4.8-20121104 is now available gccadmin
22:46 LRA best_reload_nregs David Miller
22:29 Minor tweak to make_extraction Eric Botcazou
22:13 Re: [help]failed to generate PHI NODE in esra pass. Martin Jambor
16:54 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Richard Biener
16:23 Re: Bugzilla new bug page Gerald Pfeifer
13:16 Re: Feature request: Attribute to delay evaluation of function argument Oleg Endo
11:25 Re: calculation of pi David Brown
09:35 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars
07:08 Re: Feature request: Attribute to delay evaluation of function argument Clinton Mead
01:45 Re: calculation of pi Ian Lance Taylor
01:37 LRA unaligned reloads David Miller
01:33 Re: Feature request: Attribute to delay evaluation of function argument Oleg Endo
00:53 Re: Configure gcc with --multilib=... ? Andrew Pinski
00:51 Re: Configure gcc with --multilib=... ? Matt Turner
00:02 Feature request: Attribute to delay evaluation of function argument Clinton Mead

November 03, 2012
22:49 gcc-4.7-20121103 is now available gccadmin
16:35 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars
16:09 GCC Phoning Home Bruce Korb
13:46 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars
11:41 Re: calculation of pi Tim Prince
09:02 [help]failed to generate PHI NODE in esra pass. Yangyueming
07:55 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars
07:33 Re: calculation of pi Mischa Baars

November 02, 2012
22:55 gcc-4.6-20121102 is now available gccadmin
18:11 Re: calculation of pi Ian Lance Taylor
15:14 calculation of pi Mischa Baars
11:32 Re: About the effect of flag_gcse_las option Steven Bosscher
10:07 Re: Debugging incorrect generation of RTL Peter Garbett
07:53 Buying Intent Ms Vanessa Lawrence

November 01, 2012
23:26 ASAN support accepted and reviewers appointed David Edelsohn
18:02 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Sterling Augustine
17:59 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Sharad Singhai
16:44 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Diego Novillo
16:41 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Sharad Singhai
15:16 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Richard Sandiford
14:02 Re: [ANN] gcc-lua: Lua plugin for the GNU Compiler Collection Diego Novillo
13:53 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Sharad Singhai
13:24 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
13:18 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
13:10 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Richard Sandiford
13:09 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Diego Novillo
12:44 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Kenneth Zadeck
12:28 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Jakub Jelinek
10:34 Re: Debugging incorrect generation of RTL Andrew Haley
10:28 Debugging incorrect generation of RTL Peter Garbett
07:52 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon Sharad Singhai

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3