This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bugzilla vs. MAINTAINERS

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:28:20 +0100
Subject: Re: bugzilla vs. MAINTAINERS
References: <20121023103750.xn74um3lwgogkss8-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <CAFiYyc2JEd6oiM95x4fBJawUzDOfa8-YKq2jW7aWmCPFpBSDWg@mail.gmail.com> <20121023105847.2j1z316io0ksk0ss-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>

On 23 October 2012 15:58, Joern Rennecke wrote:
>
> Well, that'd be all right with me, but if there is no @gcc.gnu.org address
> that matches the address listed in MAINTAINERS, it should allow the address
> from MAINTAINERS.  Of course, if there is a @gcc.gnu.org address for that
> person that bugzilla somehow fails to find, I'd rather have it find that.

But usually the name will match, so if you type the maintainer's name
and let bugzilla search it will show you the valid addresses for that
person.

References:
- bugzilla vs. MAINTAINERS
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: bugzilla vs. MAINTAINERS
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: bugzilla vs. MAINTAINERS
  - From: Joern Rennecke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]