This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Functions that are CSEable but not pure
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Consider instead the following expansion:
> > __thread void (*i_initialize)(void) = i_init;
> That would work too, though it wouldn't have the benefit of link-compatibility
> with __thread (for variables that don't need dynamic initialization) that the
> current scheme has.
I'd certainly think that for C, __thread and _Thread_local should be
link-compatible (and probably should be treated more or less identically
apart from some diagnostics), and that C11 _Thread_local should be
link-compatible (in the absence of dynamic initialization) with C++11
Joseph S. Myers