This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Functions that are CSEable but not pure
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 08:56:03AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >I think the plan was for these functions not to return any value,
> No, I'm talking about the wrapper function which returns a reference
> to the variable (as in my example).
Sure, but I thought you want to inline the wrapper function as soon as
possible. Or do you want to keep it as some kind of builtin that gets
expanded during expansion to the test and call?