This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Cgraph Modification Plan

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at googlers dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:03:34 -0400
Subject: Re: Cgraph Modification Plan
References: <CAGqM8fazAi8DJ1k70gB-EtUz_7F1oVB=esw6NwELWK2srkN+sA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGqM8fYrrW-PnUT1sZDq+sKHDAMiG_qfjzf38=Q_mtfcRBDBxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGqM8fbBaLsxgNnuoQkZcx8QizT8M_KhrqR85gtBaYNe+0t1Sg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2012-09-11 16:22 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:

We do not yet seem to have consensus on a long term plan.
Would it be reasonable to start on short term prepatory work?
In particular, I was think we could do
    Add converters and testers.
    Change callers to use those.
and maybe

Change callers to use type-safe parameters.

Where those mean what I earlier stated.

Comments?

Seems straightforward enough. And it doesn't seem like it will affect the longer term conversion.

Diego.

References:
- Cgraph Modification Plan
  - From: Lawrence Crowl
- Re: Cgraph Modification Plan
  - From: Lawrence Crowl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]