This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Picochip port (was: Steering Committee)
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Hariharan Sandanagobalane <hariharan at picochip dot com>, Daniel Towner <dant at picochip dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:50:06 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Picochip port (was: Steering Committee)
- References: <CANq-hQhBWeqfLXY5GLFO87hK=Gj+hp1LiwNHwEot-8GSJrPGnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Hariharan Sandanagobalane wrote:
> I used to maintain the picochip port of GCC, but I have not been
> active on the picochip port over the last 8 months. This is unlikely
> to change in the future, so I would like my name to be removed from
> the maintainers list as picochip maintainer. I am still actively
> working on GCC, so I would like to be added to the "Write after
> approval" list.
you can just go ahead and make this change (moving yourself from
maintainer of picochip to the write after approval section).
A maintainer stepping down is nothing the steering committee can,
should nor wants to approve. Giving a heads up and updating
MAINTAINERS is very much appreciated, however, as opposed to
What does this mean for the future of the Picochip port in GCC?
Daniel, are you going to pick this up actively? Anyone else? Or
should we look into deprecating the port with GCC 4.8 and possibly
removing it with the following release?