This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ and gather-detailed-mem-stats
On 8/15/12, Gabriel Dos Reis <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2012 Richard Guenther <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > Prototype below - fire away on bikeshedding names.
> > > Make it mirror the preprocessor names that people are used to,
> > > and do away with the _loc_: __builtin_FILE, __builtin_FUNCTION,
> > > __builtin_LINE.
> > Hm, well. The following includes documentation and the old
> > new names, __builtin_file_location, etc.
> This looks good too me.
> A few points to consider:
> * relation of __builtin_function_location to C99 (and C++11)
> * Do we want to update libcpp to systematically expand
> __FILE__ to __builtin_file_location, etc?
Do you mean just within gcc sources, or in general? I think the
latter would fail compatibility tests.
> It general, it might be good to avoid too many ways of spelling
> the same thing.
While I'm not excited by the name, __builtin_lazy_FILE has the
virtue of being clear in the lazy binding of the name.