This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Are we fast yet?
- From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis at gmx dot net>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Andrey Belevantsev <abel at ispras dot ru>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:19:27 +0300 (EEST)
- Subject: Re: Are we fast yet?
- References: <alpine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org> <alpine.LNX.email@example.com>
I've finished some final updates, according to recommendations you
proposed. Please let me know what you think.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
* 4 tests are now benchmarked: empty.c, reload.c with -g3 -O0, reload.c
with -g -O2, XPath.cpp with -g -O2 from xalanc (someone mentioned xalanc
benchmark of SPEC2006 as good way to stress cc1plus, unfortunately I
couldn't find SPEC source so I used one of the most complex files of
* Instruction count on the left, time on the right.
* All points on the first graph are clickable so you can view the
callgraph and click through it to the function you are interested. You can
also edit directly the URL to achieve this, e.g. by adding
&f=df_install_refs to load that function.
* Memory usage is on the second graph
P.S. I'll refrain from doing any more web development until the end of
GSOC, but all my cron jobs are running regularly so this content is being
updated automatically. Next step on this front is to actually bring this
online at gcc.gnu.org, I'll contact firstname.lastname@example.org for this.