This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends


On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>
>>> The same happens for rs6000-ibm-aix6.1, which also doesn't have
>>> BSS_SECTION_ASM_OP, even though there should be BSS support for XCOFF
>>> (http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v6r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.aix.
>>>files%2Fdoc%2Faixfiles%2FXCOFF.htm).
>>
>> That's certainly more annoying on AIX than on Tru64.
>
> BSS was a later addition and there is no ".bss" pseudo-op directive,
> unlike the ".comm" directive. There only is the BSS storage class.

Do you know where I could find documentation for how to write out
something with BSS storage class? Is that something that GNU binutils
support, so that I can try it out?

Ciao!
Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]