This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 07:23:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: What do do with the exceptional case of expand_case for SJLJ exceptions
- References: <CABu31nMg0zBJCN2-jSfM_C8SOnPoOJyGBvJqu_=B=a53eOD0-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc1g2h_CtkWQYLtU=+RCz26XWH5VLTmELG0hgxoVzaWEqw@mail.gmail.com> <20120418103928.GB5160@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <4F8EB726.6020502@redhat.com> <CABu31nPAyy98Lnhkypu1UxXN5wm+XkKq8f+CZVhGWQA7UbV-GA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/12/12 06:00, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> * toplev.c (process_options): Fail for sjlj exceptions if the
> target machine
> has no casesi insn and no tablejump insn.
Looks good. How many targets have neither case/tablejump?
r~