This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: -Wall by default


On 04/12/2012 04:23 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> because -Os says it optimizes for size, the expectation is clear.
> -O3 does not necessarily give better optimization than -O2.


No, but it does mean that GCC turns on more optimization options.

"Optimize yet more. -O3 turns on all optimizations specified by -O2 and also turns on the -finline-functions,
-funswitch-loops, -fpredictive-commoning, -fgcse-after-reload, -ftree-vectorize and -fipa-cp-clone options. "

Just like -W3 wouldn't necessarily generate more warnings on
your code than -W1, perhaps because your code is
already "clean" enough.  It would simply be documented as:

"-W3: Warn yet more.  -W3 turns on all warnings specified by -W2 and also ...".

I'll also note the parallel with -glevel, not just -O.

So, 'gcc -glevel -Wlevel -Olevel' feels quite natural to me.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]