This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: -Wall by default
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 09:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2012-04-09 13:03:38 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>>>> On 4/9/2012 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe -Wstandard isn't the best name though, as "standard" usually
>>>>> means something quite specific for compilers, and the warning switch
>>>>> wouldn't have anything to do with standards conformance.
>>>> -Wdefault
>>>>
>>>> might be better
>>> except if people want warnings about "defaults" in C++11 (which can mean
>>> lot of things).
>>
>> How about a warning level?
>>
>> -W0: no warnings (equivalent to -w)
>> -W1: default
>> -W2: equivalent to the current -Wall
>> -W3: equivalent to the current -Wall -Wextra
>
> ?I like this suggestion a lot.
>
me, very not. :-(
-- Gaby