This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: -Wall by default

From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:48:29 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default
References: <CAAiZkiDuX94Qf3-1EONGVnxX4nsxhdHLemg9kSZRVVaarTQ-OA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7D5EB4.2060903@redhat.com> <CAAiZkiDJ_iB46Q36FQePcfyx7D35OBpdQNKmg9kCTyWMH09SqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc25PLAuc-RL7zYqUwBsjQ6kbpVh0FSCEQcVGukYDSkEhg@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/05/2012 10:39 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

... [-Wall + -Werror] ...

> Btw, it would be more reasonable to enable a subset of warnings that
> we enable at -Wall by default.  Notably those that if they were not
> false positives, would lead to undefined behavior at runtime.  Specifically
> I don't think we should warn about unused static functions or variables
> by default.


Yes, I would agree more with something like that.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: -Wall by default
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

References:
- RFC: -Wall by default
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: RFC: -Wall by default
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: RFC: -Wall by default
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: RFC: -Wall by default
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]