On 8 February 2012 13:06, Andrew MacLeod<amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/08/2012 05:54 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely<jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
wrote:
Should they be?
Yes. Esp. also the deprecation of the __sync builtins.
Yes, I meant to do that last week, but instead it's this week :-P Gerald
had pinged me about it a while ago.
Great, thanks - I was thinking about adding a line to the C++11
improvements in the libstdc++ section mentioning the new
implementation of<atomic>, do you think it's worth it?