gcc archive
author index for February, 2012

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

37221463993912

• 2012-02-29 13:17 Federal Tax Transfer was Disallowed Ref97798578

åè

• 2012-02-21 15:19 Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc
• 2012-02-22 13:34 Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc

KÅiÅtof Åelechovski

• 2012-02-15 20:47 Let INSTALL/README mention the instructions on line

PaweÅ Sikora

• 2012-02-10 17:31 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 17:58 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

ZoltÃn KÃcsi

• 2012-02-05 11:43 libgcc maintainer

Alan Cox

• 2012-02-01 19:57 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Aldy Hernandez

• 2012-02-02 15:58 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-07 15:06 Re: [trans-mem,libitm] brief report on known bugs

Alexandre Almeida

• 2012-02-05 16:29 Size of en um‏
• 2012-02-06 22:14 RE: Size o f enum‏
• 2012-02-07 13:57 Problem with inline member functions

Alexandre Oliva

• 2012-02-01 02:31 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini
• 2012-02-01 02:37 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini

Amittai Aviram

• 2012-02-11 22:20 Altering OpenMP emitted code

Amker.Cheng

• 2012-02-05 09:56 question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre
• 2012-02-07 13:31 Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre

Andi Kleen

• 2012-02-07 17:28 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers

Andreas Krebbel

• 2012-02-16 15:41 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs

Andreas Schwab

• 2012-02-04 12:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 14:09 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 14:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 10:15 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-23 18:16 Re: error in gcc version 4.6.2 ???

Andrew Haley

• 2012-02-02 14:58 Re: [Patch, fortran] Fix ICE with class array references.
• 2012-02-09 10:35 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 13:46 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:15 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:50 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:58 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:59 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 16:02 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 17:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 18:09 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 10:42 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-10 10:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 14:05 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 14:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 17:42 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 13:33 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 09:51 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 16:45 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 17:05 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 18:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-15 15:19 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-16 14:51 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-16 16:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-21 15:24 Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc

Andrew MacLeod

• 2012-02-03 16:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 19:17 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-08 13:06 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 15:39 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 15:44 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 15:51 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 20:03 [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 21:50 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 23:35 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Andrew Pinski

• 2012-02-06 22:15 Re: Size of enumâ
• 2012-02-07 17:34 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers
• 2012-02-21 20:16 Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere?

Arnaldo

• 2012-02-16 23:18 Iterating over RTL in Graphite
• 2012-02-18 22:46 Re: Iterating over RTL in Graphite

Arnaud Charlet

• 2012-02-09 18:16 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Aurelien Buhrig

• 2012-02-29 08:11 IVs optimization issue
• 2012-02-29 15:08 Re: IVs optimization issue
• 2012-02-29 15:41 Re: IVs optimization issue
• 2012-02-29 17:02 Re: IVs optimization issue

Bernd Petrovitsch

• 2012-02-02 09:29 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Bernd Schmidt

• 2012-02-08 16:59 Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-20 15:50 Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-22 13:38 Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-22 16:46 Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation

Bin.Cheng

• 2012-02-29 14:50 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre

Boehm, Hans

• 2012-02-01 19:46 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:05 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:27 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 22:20 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Caroline Tice

• 2012-02-16 18:59 [Announce] New vtable-security branch in GCC repository

Christoph Lauter

• 2012-02-14 18:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Colin Walters

• 2012-02-01 16:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2012-02-27 21:33 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums

Dave Korn

• 2012-02-05 00:44 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-05 20:53 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

David Brown

• 2012-02-05 20:40 Re: Size of enum‏

David Malcolm

• 2012-02-06 19:08 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.9
• 2012-02-10 16:00 Re: GCC GCOV
• 2012-02-10 21:09 Re: GCC GCOV
• 2012-02-17 19:35 Re: Iterating over RTL in Graphite

David Miller

• 2012-02-01 18:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-29 18:21 Re: The state of glibc libm

David Sterba

• 2012-02-02 11:13 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Dennis Clarke

• 2012-02-01 17:52 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-23 18:10 Re: error in gcc version 4.6.2 ???

Diego Novillo

• 2012-02-02 02:25 Re: Access to source code from an analyser
• 2012-02-06 19:21 Fwd: [Announce] Google Summer of Code 2012
• 2012-02-10 15:27 [pph] Merge from trunk
• 2012-02-24 13:49 Proposal: Make TYPE_HASH != TYPE_UID

DJ Delorie

• 2012-02-03 06:46 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Dominique Dhumieres

• 2012-02-03 16:40 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Erotavlas_turbo

• 2012-02-19 13:40 GCC: OpenMP posix pthread
• 2012-02-19 13:53 Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread
• 2012-02-21 13:56 GCC and x86intrin.h header
• 2012-02-21 14:49 Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread
• 2012-02-22 21:31 Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2012-02-25 17:21 Bootstrapping and C++ compiler

gccadmin

• 2012-02-02 22:41 gcc-4.5-20120202 is now available
• 2012-02-03 22:56 gcc-4.6-20120203 is now available
• 2012-02-04 22:48 gcc-4.7-20120204 is now available
• 2012-02-07 22:42 gcc-4.4-20120207 is now available
• 2012-02-09 22:49 gcc-4.5-20120209 is now available
• 2012-02-10 22:44 gcc-4.6-20120210 is now available
• 2012-02-11 22:48 gcc-4.7-20120211 is now available
• 2012-02-14 22:43 gcc-4.4-20120214 is now available
• 2012-02-16 22:45 gcc-4.5-20120216 is now available
• 2012-02-17 22:52 gcc-4.6-20120217 is now available
• 2012-02-18 22:54 gcc-4.7-20120218 is now available
• 2012-02-21 22:43 gcc-4.4-20120221 is now available
• 2012-02-23 22:43 gcc-4.5-20120223 is now available
• 2012-02-24 22:49 gcc-4.6-20120224 is now available
• 2012-02-25 22:43 gcc-4.7-20120225 is now available
• 2012-02-28 22:47 gcc-4.4-20120228 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2012-02-05 19:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:20 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 17:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 19:17 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 16:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 16:26 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 20:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 16:41 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 16:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 18:52 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Georg-Johann Lay

• 2012-02-15 14:22 weird impact of lower-subreg on IRA/reload
• 2012-02-16 14:11 Re: weird impact of lower-subreg on IRA/reload
• 2012-02-17 11:54 PR51782: Missing address-space information in .expand
• 2012-02-17 15:12 Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns?
• 2012-02-17 18:04 Re: Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns?
• 2012-02-22 11:19 toplev.c: Question on __gnu_lto markers in .comm

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2012-02-04 23:09 Re: about hosting the gcc.
• 2012-02-05 20:51 Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership
• 2012-02-08 23:18 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-12 01:38 [wwwdocs] Remove ia64-unknown-linux-gnu as secondary platform
• 2012-02-18 23:05 Defaulting to -fno-math-errno (was: Fwd: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend)

H.J. Lu

• 2012-02-01 00:07 The Linux binutils 2.22.52.0.1 is released

Hans Wennborg

• 2012-02-06 18:07 Compile-time measurements in Chromium
• 2012-02-07 10:20 Re: Compile-time measurements in Chromium

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2012-02-07 22:14 Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL

Henderson, Stuart

• 2012-02-01 14:51 RE: ICE building compiler
• 2012-02-07 18:43 spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-14 18:12 RE: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-20 15:42 RE: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-22 12:22 RE: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation
• 2012-02-22 16:15 RE: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2012-02-06 19:35 Re: libgcc maintainer
• 2012-02-07 19:49 Re: Template Handling in G++
• 2012-02-07 19:51 Re: da.po.diff
• 2012-02-09 06:33 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-09 23:06 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-14 15:05 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums
• 2012-02-14 17:51 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums
• 2012-02-15 01:34 Re: Compilation fails on Debian Wheezy - cannot find gnu/stubs-32.h [multiarch]
• 2012-02-15 14:56 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums
• 2012-02-21 13:51 Re: How to suppress frame pointer usage by default?
• 2012-02-21 14:33 Re: GCC and x86intrin.h header
• 2012-02-25 03:07 Re: inline assembly
• 2012-02-28 18:14 Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report)
• 2012-02-29 21:56 Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report)

Ingo Molnar

• 2012-02-02 11:20 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Iyer, Balaji V

• 2012-02-06 20:19 Template Handling in G++
• 2012-02-23 22:29 Function-Specific Optimization Branch
• 2012-02-23 22:36 RE: Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken?

J K

• 2012-02-23 15:31 Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken?

Jack Howarth

• 2012-02-24 02:34 Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c
• 2012-02-25 14:01 Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

Jakub Jelinek

• 2012-02-01 19:40 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 20:16 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-10 21:40 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-12 14:39 Re: Altering OpenMP emitted code
• 2012-02-13 14:32 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-21 15:31 Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread
• 2012-02-23 21:00 GCC 4.6.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
• 2012-02-27 09:54 Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6

James Courtier-Dutton

• 2012-02-02 11:11 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 22:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 23:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 10:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-05 16:08 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 10:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 14:51 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:56 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 13:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 14:25 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 14:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-18 14:38 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-22 19:05 Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc
• 2012-02-22 19:09 Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc

James Dennett

• 2012-02-05 21:13 Re: Size of enumâ

Jan Kara

• 2012-02-01 15:19 Memory corruption due to word sharing

Janne Blomqvist

• 2012-02-12 16:46 Fwd: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Jay Freeman (saurik)

• 2012-02-28 05:50 random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report)
• 2012-02-28 21:58 Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report)

Jeff Law

• 2012-02-01 18:46 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 19:55 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Jiangning Liu

• 2012-02-17 09:53 A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-20 08:47 RE: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-21 08:54 RE: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-21 09:58 RE: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-22 01:16 RE: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-24 08:07 A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 03:19 RE: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 08:07 RE: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 08:33 RE: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt

Jiri Kosina

• 2012-02-01 17:12 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Jonathan Wakely

• 2012-02-03 22:18 Re: Misleading error message with templated c++ code
• 2012-02-05 20:58 Re: Size of enumâ
• 2012-02-07 15:22 Re: Problem with inline member functions
• 2012-02-08 10:00 New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 15:23 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 21:31 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-08 22:45 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-14 22:35 Re: Compilation fails on Debian Wheezy - cannot find gnu/stubs-32.h [multiarch]
• 2012-02-24 09:12 Re: Is it a bug when use “<<”if the operator is out of the size "0~63"
• 2012-02-25 19:20 Re: optimization report

Joseph S. Myers

• 2012-02-06 23:22 Re: diff file for da.po
• 2012-02-09 16:53 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 17:18 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 17:56 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 18:00 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 20:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 20:33 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 03:16 Re: Announcing new docstring relicensing maintainers
• 2012-02-10 13:50 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 14:01 Documenting libm function errors
• 2012-02-10 17:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 17:37 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 14:18 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 16:35 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 20:20 Re: odd license grant in gcc(1) manpage
• 2012-02-15 00:07 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-15 13:32 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-15 13:50 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-16 16:20 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-16 16:22 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-29 17:17 The state of glibc libm

Katy Harvey

• 2012-02-17 12:10 Business inquiry for your site /

kayihan at yilmazlarlojistik dot com

• 2012-02-22 04:47 BİZ DEN FİYAT ALMADAN NAKLİYE YAPTIRM AYIN

Kaz Kojima

• 2012-02-22 23:43 Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64

Konstantin Vladimirov

• 2012-02-03 13:26 weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 18:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-07 12:26 lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers
• 2012-02-07 12:57 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers
• 2012-02-07 13:32 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers
• 2012-02-21 13:37 How to suppress frame pointer usage by default?

Kumar, Venkataramanan

• 2012-02-19 15:24 [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern.
• 2012-02-20 15:02 RE: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern.

Linus Torvalds

• 2012-02-01 16:42 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 16:57 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 17:30 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 17:37 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 18:53 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 18:58 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 19:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 19:47 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 20:02 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 20:20 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 20:44 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:00 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:21 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:56 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 22:27 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 23:11 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 17:52 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 19:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 17:17 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 20:00 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Ludovic Courtès

• 2012-02-02 09:58 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
• 2012-02-16 11:33 GCC meets Guile at its birthday party

Mads Jensen

• 2012-02-06 18:20 diff file for da.po
• 2012-02-06 20:24 da.po.diff
• 2012-02-18 10:37 fortran/parse.c

Mahmood Naderan

• 2012-02-25 19:06 optimization report

Marc Glisse

• 2012-02-19 15:44 Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern.
• 2012-02-25 19:20 Re: Bootstrapping and C++ compiler

Marc Lehmann

• 2012-02-10 01:21 Announcing new docstring relicensing maintainers

Markus Trippelsdorf

• 2012-02-01 15:35 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Martin Jambor

• 2012-02-15 14:24 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Matthew Gretton-Dann

• 2012-02-03 10:04 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Matthias Klose

• 2012-02-09 18:13 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Michael Matz

• 2012-02-01 17:41 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 13:43 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 16:28 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 15:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 15:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 16:44 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 16:47 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 16:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 16:16 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Miles Bader

• 2012-02-02 11:01 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
• 2012-02-24 09:05 Re: Is it a bug when use â<<âif the operator is out of the size "0~63"

Mingjie Xing

• 2012-02-07 06:38 [gccint-zh] GCC Internals Chinese Translation Project
• 2012-02-07 07:40 Re: [gccint-zh] GCC Internals Chinese Translation Project

Nenad Vukicevic

• 2012-02-09 05:16 Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Patrick Marlier

• 2012-02-07 14:41 [trans-mem,libitm] brief report on known bugs
• 2012-02-23 19:04 Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c
• 2012-02-23 19:14 Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c
• 2012-02-24 03:35 Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

Paul E. McKenney

• 2012-02-01 22:46 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 18:43 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 19:39 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 20:20 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Paul Rahme

• 2012-02-17 18:26 BEWARE: PLATEAU + SUCCESSFACTORS + SAP

Paul S

• 2012-02-09 22:35 register used as both FP and GP register when -Os switch used
• 2012-02-10 11:35 register used as both FP and GP register when -Os switch used

Paulo J. Matos

• 2012-02-01 17:54 Documentation error for cbranch<mode>4
• 2012-02-10 16:58 Combine misses commutativity
• 2012-02-10 17:25 Re: Combine misses commutativity
• 2012-02-13 09:41 Re: Combine misses commutativity

Peter A. Felvegi

• 2012-02-03 21:29 Misleading error message with templated c++ code

Peter Bergner

• 2012-02-01 19:04 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Peter Garbett

• 2012-02-27 09:01 backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
• 2012-02-27 09:20 Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6

Quentin Neill

• 2012-02-13 23:52 symbol_refs vs. eq_attr in define_insn_reservations

Ralf Corsepius

• 2012-02-15 06:10 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums

reed kotler

• 2012-02-24 21:59 inline assembly

Richard Guenther

• 2012-02-01 09:08 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini
• 2012-02-02 09:35 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 09:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 09:47 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 11:23 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-02 11:24 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 09:37 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-03 13:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-06 11:28 Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre
• 2012-02-06 11:54 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-06 13:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-07 09:43 Re: Compile-time measurements in Chromium
• 2012-02-07 12:37 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers
• 2012-02-07 13:11 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers
• 2012-02-07 14:09 Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre
• 2012-02-08 10:54 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
• 2012-02-09 10:33 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-09 10:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 15:28 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 16:00 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-10 10:07 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 10:28 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 13:48 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 14:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-15 10:32 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-20 11:28 Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern.
• 2012-02-20 11:33 Re: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-21 09:27 Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere?
• 2012-02-21 09:40 Re: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-21 10:18 Re: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-22 09:24 Re: A problem about loop store motion
• 2012-02-22 11:26 Re: toplev.c: Question on __gnu_lto markers in .comm
• 2012-02-24 09:06 Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-26 15:10 Re: Proposal: Make TYPE_HASH != TYPE_UID
• 2012-02-26 15:22 Re: -floop-flatten and PR 52307
• 2012-02-27 09:08 Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
• 2012-02-27 09:45 Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
• 2012-02-27 12:46 GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-02-27)
• 2012-02-28 10:21 Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 15:24 Re: [WIP PATCH] Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere?
• 2012-02-29 09:43 Re: IVs optimization issue
• 2012-02-29 15:01 Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre
• 2012-02-29 15:15 Re: IVs optimization issue
• 2012-02-29 16:08 Re: IVs optimization issue

Richard Henderson

• 2012-02-10 19:01 Re: Combine misses commutativity
• 2012-02-10 19:28 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-15 21:00 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-16 18:37 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-16 18:59 Re: weird impact of lower-subreg on IRA/reload
• 2012-02-16 19:07 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-16 19:55 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-17 17:51 Re: Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns?

Richard Sandiford

• 2012-02-15 19:53 Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-16 18:58 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-16 19:31 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs
• 2012-02-16 19:37 Re: symbol_refs vs. eq_attr in define_insn_reservations

Robert Dewar

• 2012-02-03 15:14 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 15:34 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 16:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 18:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 21:51 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 12:15 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 14:16 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 15:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Roberto Bagnara

• 2012-02-27 21:07 Parma Polyhedra Library 0.12

Roland McGrath

• 2012-02-01 17:19 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini

Russ Allbery

• 2012-02-09 21:56 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-09 23:14 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-10 18:02 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-10 21:10 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Samuel Bronson

• 2012-02-13 19:45 odd license grant in gcc(1) manpage
• 2012-02-16 00:43 License confusion (was: Re: odd license grant in gcc(1) manpage)

Satya Prakash Prasad

• 2012-02-09 23:53 GCC GCOV
• 2012-02-10 20:15 Re: GCC GCOV

SchmiTTT

• 2012-02-23 17:53 error in gcc version 4.6.2 ???

Sebastian Huber

• 2012-02-14 10:30 [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums
• 2012-02-14 15:27 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums
• 2012-02-15 08:31 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums
• 2012-02-28 16:54 Re: [ARM] EABI and the default to short enums

Thomas Koenig

• 2012-02-26 12:33 -floop-flatten and PR 52307

Thomas Schwinge

• 2012-02-22 19:29 Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64
• 2012-02-23 19:50 Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64
• 2012-02-24 21:29 Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64

Tim Prince

• 2012-02-05 18:38 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 13:39 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 13:34 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 14:25 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-19 13:43 Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread

Tobias Burnus

• 2012-02-18 11:41 Re: fortran/parse.c

Tobias Grosser

• 2012-02-09 12:42 Graphite news
• 2012-02-09 22:37 Re: Graphite news
• 2012-02-09 22:54 Re: Graphite news
• 2012-02-10 01:27 Re: Graphite news
• 2012-02-18 02:15 Re: Iterating over RTL in Graphite

Tom Tromey

• 2012-02-16 21:09 Re: Help with cfi markup for MIPS16 hard-float stubs

Toon Moene

• 2012-02-03 19:12 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-09 19:26 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-10 20:59 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10
• 2012-02-15 23:31 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Torvald Riegel

• 2012-02-01 17:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 19:16 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 20:41 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 20:54 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:25 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-01 21:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
• 2012-02-06 15:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing

Uday Khedker

• 2012-02-05 16:18 Tutorial on GCC for Parallelization

Ulrich Weigand

• 2012-02-20 22:20 Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere?
• 2012-02-28 15:10 [WIP PATCH] Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere?

Uros Bizjak

• 2012-02-27 09:28 Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
• 2012-02-27 09:49 Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6

Vincent Lefevre

• 2012-02-03 12:39 Re: Assignment to volatile objects
• 2012-02-03 15:29 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 15:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 16:24 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 21:33 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-03 21:49 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 00:07 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 00:26 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-04 00:39 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-05 19:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-05 22:40 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-06 12:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 13:11 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 13:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 14:14 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 14:59 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-13 15:25 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 13:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 13:26 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-14 13:38 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-15 09:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-16 14:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-16 15:08 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
• 2012-02-20 14:37 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Vladimir Makarov

• 2012-02-09 22:05 Re: Graphite news
• 2012-02-10 00:59 Re: Graphite news
• 2012-02-15 17:26 Re: weird impact of lower-subreg on IRA/reload

Walter Lee

• 2012-02-05 20:53 Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership

William J. Schmidt

• 2012-02-27 15:32 Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 17:05 Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 17:53 Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
• 2012-02-28 20:32 Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt

Witold Baryluk

• 2012-02-14 22:27 Compilation fails on Debian Wheezy - cannot find gnu/stubs-32.h [multiarch]
• 2012-02-14 22:45 Re: Compilation fails on Debian Wheezy - cannot find gnu/stubs-32.h [multiarch]
• 2012-02-15 02:10 Re: Compilation fails on Debian Wheezy - cannot find gnu/stubs-32.h [multiarch]

Yang Yueming

• 2012-02-24 08:35 Is it a bug when use â<<âif the operator is out of the size "0~63"

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)