gcc archive
date index for February, 2012

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 10, 2012
22:44 gcc-4.6-20120210 is now available gccadmin
21:40 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Jakub Jelinek
21:10 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Russ Allbery
21:09 Re: GCC GCOV David Malcolm
20:59 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Toon Moene
20:15 Re: GCC GCOV Satya Prakash Prasad
19:28 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Henderson
19:01 Re: Combine misses commutativity Richard Henderson
18:02 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Russ Allbery
17:58 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend PaweÅ Sikora
17:42 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
17:37 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
17:31 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend PaweÅ Sikora
17:25 Re: Combine misses commutativity Paulo J. Matos
17:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
16:58 Combine misses commutativity Paulo J. Matos
16:26 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Geert Bosch
16:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Geert Bosch
16:00 Re: GCC GCOV David Malcolm
15:27 [pph] Merge from trunk Diego Novillo
14:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
14:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
14:25 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
14:05 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
14:01 Documenting libm function errors Joseph S. Myers
13:50 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
13:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
11:35 register used as both FP and GP register when -Os switch used Paul S
10:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
10:42 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Andrew Haley
10:15 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Andreas Schwab
10:07 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
03:16 Re: Announcing new docstring relicensing maintainers Joseph S. Myers
01:27 Re: Graphite news Tobias Grosser
01:21 Announcing new docstring relicensing maintainers Marc Lehmann
00:59 Re: Graphite news Vladimir Makarov

February 09, 2012
23:53 GCC GCOV Satya Prakash Prasad
23:14 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Russ Allbery
23:06 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Ian Lance Taylor
22:54 Re: Graphite news Tobias Grosser
22:49 gcc-4.5-20120209 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: Graphite news Tobias Grosser
22:35 register used as both FP and GP register when -Os switch used Paul S
22:05 Re: Graphite news Vladimir Makarov
21:56 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Russ Allbery
20:33 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
20:23 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
19:26 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Toon Moene
19:17 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Geert Bosch
18:16 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Arnaud Charlet
18:13 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Matthias Klose
18:09 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
18:00 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
17:56 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
17:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
17:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Geert Bosch
17:18 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
16:53 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Joseph S. Myers
16:16 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
16:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
16:02 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
16:00 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
15:59 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
15:58 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
15:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
15:56 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
15:50 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
15:28 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
15:20 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Geert Bosch
15:15 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
14:51 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
13:46 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
13:39 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Tim Prince
12:42 Graphite news Tobias Grosser
10:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
10:35 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andrew Haley
10:33 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Richard Guenther
10:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
06:33 Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Ian Lance Taylor
05:16 Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10 Nenad Vukicevic

February 08, 2012
23:35 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
23:18 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
22:45 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Jonathan Wakely
21:50 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
21:31 Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Jonathan Wakely
20:03 [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
16:59 Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation Bernd Schmidt
15:51 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
15:44 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
15:39 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
15:23 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Jonathan Wakely
13:06 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Andrew MacLeod
10:54 Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Richard Guenther
10:00 New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html Jonathan Wakely

February 07, 2012
22:42 gcc-4.4-20120207 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:51 Re: da.po.diff Ian Lance Taylor
19:49 Re: Template Handling in G++ Ian Lance Taylor
18:43 spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation Henderson, Stuart
17:34 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Andrew Pinski
17:28 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Andi Kleen
15:22 Re: Problem with inline member functions Jonathan Wakely
15:06 Re: [trans-mem,libitm] brief report on known bugs Aldy Hernandez
14:41 [trans-mem,libitm] brief report on known bugs Patrick Marlier
14:09 Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre Richard Guenther
13:57 Problem with inline member functions Alexandre Almeida
13:32 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Konstantin Vladimirov
13:31 Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre Amker.Cheng
13:11 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Richard Guenther
12:57 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Konstantin Vladimirov
12:37 Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Richard Guenther
12:26 lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers Konstantin Vladimirov
10:20 Re: Compile-time measurements in Chromium Hans Wennborg
09:43 Re: Compile-time measurements in Chromium Richard Guenther
07:40 Re: [gccint-zh] GCC Internals Chinese Translation Project Mingjie Xing
06:38 [gccint-zh] GCC Internals Chinese Translation Project Mingjie Xing

February 06, 2012
23:22 Re: diff file for da.po Joseph S. Myers
22:15 Re: Size of enumâ Andrew Pinski
22:14 RE: Size o f enum‏ Alexandre Almeida
20:24 da.po.diff Mads Jensen
20:19 Template Handling in G++ Iyer, Balaji V
19:35 Re: libgcc maintainer Ian Lance Taylor
19:21 Fwd: [Announce] Google Summer of Code 2012 Diego Novillo
19:08 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.9 David Malcolm
18:20 diff file for da.po Mads Jensen
18:07 Compile-time measurements in Chromium Hans Wennborg
15:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
13:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
12:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
11:54 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
11:28 Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre Richard Guenther

February 05, 2012
22:40 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
21:13 Re: Size of enumâ James Dennett
20:58 Re: Size of enumâ Jonathan Wakely
20:53 Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership Walter Lee
20:53 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Dave Korn
20:51 Re: [GCC steering committee] TILEPro/TILE-Gx port maintainership Gerald Pfeifer
20:40 Re: Size of enum‏ David Brown
19:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Geert Bosch
19:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
18:38 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Tim Prince
16:29 Size of en um‏ Alexandre Almeida
16:18 Tutorial on GCC for Parallelization Uday Khedker
16:08 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
11:43 libgcc maintainer ZoltÃn KÃcsi
09:56 question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre Amker.Cheng
00:44 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Dave Korn

February 04, 2012
23:09 Re: about hosting the gcc. Gerald Pfeifer
22:48 gcc-4.7-20120204 is now available gccadmin
15:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
14:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andreas Schwab
14:16 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
14:09 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andreas Schwab
12:15 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
12:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Andreas Schwab
10:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
00:39 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
00:26 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
00:07 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre

February 03, 2012
23:30 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
22:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend James Courtier-Dutton
22:56 gcc-4.6-20120203 is now available gccadmin
22:18 Re: Misleading error message with templated c++ code Jonathan Wakely
21:51 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
21:49 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
21:33 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
21:29 Misleading error message with templated c++ code Peter A. Felvegi
20:20 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Paul E. McKenney
20:00 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
19:17 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Andrew MacLeod
19:12 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Toon Moene
18:21 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
18:13 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Konstantin Vladimirov
17:17 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
16:47 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
16:44 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
16:40 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Dominique Dhumieres
16:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Andrew MacLeod
16:36 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
16:24 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
15:57 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
15:55 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
15:34 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
15:29 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Vincent Lefevre
15:14 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Robert Dewar
15:01 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Michael Matz
13:43 Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Richard Guenther
13:26 weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend Konstantin Vladimirov
12:39 Re: Assignment to volatile objects Vincent Lefevre
10:04 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Matthew Gretton-Dann
09:37 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Guenther
06:46 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing DJ Delorie

February 02, 2012
22:41 gcc-4.5-20120202 is now available gccadmin
19:39 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Paul E. McKenney
19:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
18:43 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Paul E. McKenney
17:52 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
16:28 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Michael Matz
15:58 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Aldy Hernandez
14:58 Re: [Patch, fortran] Fix ICE with class array references. Andrew Haley
13:43 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Michael Matz
11:24 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Guenther
11:23 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Guenther
11:20 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Ingo Molnar
11:13 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing David Sterba
11:11 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing James Courtier-Dutton
11:01 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Miles Bader
09:58 Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC Ludovic Courtès
09:47 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Guenther
09:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Guenther
09:35 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Richard Guenther
09:29 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing Bernd Petrovitsch
02:25 Re: Access to source code from an analyser Diego Novillo

February 01, 2012
23:11 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
22:46 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Paul E. McKenney
22:27 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
22:20 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing Boehm, Hans
21:56 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
21:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
21:27 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing Boehm, Hans
21:25 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
21:21 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
21:05 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing Boehm, Hans
21:00 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
20:54 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
20:44 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
20:41 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
20:20 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
20:16 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Jakub Jelinek
20:02 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
19:57 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Alan Cox
19:55 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Jeff Law
19:47 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
19:46 RE: Memory corruption due to word sharing Boehm, Hans
19:40 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Jakub Jelinek
19:16 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
19:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
19:04 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Peter Bergner
18:58 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
18:53 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
18:46 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Jeff Law
18:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing David Miller
17:54 Documentation error for cbranch<mode>4 Paulo J. Matos
17:52 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Dennis Clarke
17:41 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Michael Matz
17:37 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
17:30 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
17:19 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Roland McGrath
17:12 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Jiri Kosina
17:09 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Torvald Riegel
16:57 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
16:42 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Linus Torvalds
16:38 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Colin Walters
15:35 Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing Markus Trippelsdorf
15:19 Memory corruption due to word sharing Jan Kara
14:51 RE: ICE building compiler Henderson, Stuart
09:08 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Richard Guenther
02:37 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Alexandre Oliva
02:31 Re: -fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini Alexandre Oliva
00:07 The Linux binutils 2.22.52.0.1 is released H.J. Lu

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3