This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, Richard Sandiford <richard dot sandiford at linaro dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:49:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p
- References: <g4boqrqufn.fsf@richards-thinkpad.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com> <201112292048.22540.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <CAFiYyc0WPFXxwozH+qVCt=XnVuJMeSHz-9mUJTc_FtKOh7JsJg@mail.gmail.com> <87y5tqrwsj.fsf@firetop.home> <CAFiYyc2zYA0+jTR_yXygRFHM4pCx5Kn-pqLw-wAAO7PMPzEh9g@mail.gmail.com> <8739b3y4fk.fsf@firetop.home>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Richard Sandiford
<rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'd say open a missed optimization bug with the testcase and go ahead
>> with both patches.
>
> OK, I committed the patches yesterday and I've just opened PR 52000
> for the missed optimisation.
Btw, looking at the m32c code what it does is valid regardless of
MEM_SCALAR_P or MEM_IN_STRUCT_P - I don't see why they should
be relevant. But it needs to cater for MEM_OFFSET and MEM_ALIAS_SET
at least
> Richard