This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: why GCC does implicit promotion to unsigned char?


On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:27:45PM +0400, Konstantin Vladimirov wrote:
> Consider code:
> 
> char A;
> char B;
> 
> char sum_A_B ( void )
> {
>   char sum = A + B;
> 
>   return sum;
> }
>   [repro.c : 6:8] A.0 = A;
>   [repro.c : 6:8] A.1 = (unsigned char) A.0;
>   [repro.c : 6:8] B.2 = B;
>   [repro.c : 6:8] B.3 = (unsigned char) B.2;
>   [repro.c : 6:8] D.1990 = A.1 + B.3;
>   [repro.c : 6:8] sum = (char) D.1990;
>   [repro.c : 8:3] D.1991 = sum;
>   [repro.c : 8:3] return D.1991;
> }
> 
> It looks really weird. Why gcc promotes char to unsigned char internally?

To avoid triggering undefined behavior.
A + B in C for char A and B is (int) A + (int) B, so either we'd have to
promote it to int and then demote, or we just cast it to unsigned and do the
addition in 8-bit.  If we don't do that, e.g. for
A = 127 and B = 127 we'd trigger undefined behavior of signed addition.
In unsigned char 127 + 127 is valid.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]