This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)]
> My concern is specifically about options for changing the default
> language version, not options for changing the libstdc++ ABI. More
> generally, about configure options affecting the semantics of code
> passed to GCC, as opposed to non-semantic configure options such as
> choosing the processor for which to optimize. (The closest we have
> to that at present is the options controlling decimal floating point
> and fixed point, but in general those are enabled by default wherever
> they work, and they only serve to permit some programs that would
> otherwise be rejected.)
Thanks for the clarification. I understand your concern here, and
frankly it seems appropriate. I'm not quite sure what is going to work
best here...
Let me re-think this and try to come up with actual patches that do
something sane, so that I can see the true scope of this work. At that
point (stage 1) I'll come back with more detail.
best,
-benjamin
- References:
- C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)]
- Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)]
- Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)]
- Re: C++ ABI RFC [was Re: C++/libiberty PATCH for many mangling fixes (6057, 48051, 50855, 51322, etc)]