This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes


On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was fixed.

What do you mean? Do you still see issues with Genome, even with the returns-twice patch? If so, just on i686 or x86_64 too? With libitm?
Sorry for confusion. Of course, I disabled your returns-twice patch. I patched at different places and I hope to figure out where is the problem and that it is not a side effect...
I am currently testing on x86_64 with libitm.


Patrick.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]