This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
December 31, 2011
| 21:43 | Bogus gcc.c-torture/execute/20071018-1.c testcase? | Mark Kettenis |
| 09:44 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
| 00:41 | Re: RTL Conditional and Call | Matt Davis |
December 30, 2011
| 18:47 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | Basile Starynkevitch |
| 17:53 | Re: Lingering tbaa in anti_dependence? | Jakub Jelinek |
| 15:29 | Re: private member in union { union } | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:26 | Re: Static code analysis follow ups | Richard Guenther |
| 15:25 | private member in union { union } | Jakub Staszak |
| 15:16 | Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p | Richard Guenther |
| 15:12 | Re: Lingering tbaa in anti_dependence? | Richard Guenther |
| 14:34 | Re: Static code analysis follow ups | Basile Starynkevitch |
| 14:17 | Static code analysis follow ups | sarah at hederstierna dot com |
| 13:51 | Re: RTL Conditional and Call | Alexander Monakov |
| 13:14 | RTL Conditional and Call | Matt Davis |
| 09:16 | Re: xlr/xlp __atomic builtins using ldadd and swap | Richard Sandiford |
| 04:16 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
| 03:10 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
| 02:44 | FW: | R A |
| 00:30 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | James Dennett |
December 29, 2011
December 28, 2011
| 23:25 | Re: a nift y feature for c prep rocessor | R A |
| 23:11 | FW: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
| 23:09 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
| 22:39 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | David Brown |
| 22:01 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | Jonathan Wakely |
| 21:06 | Re: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | Jonathan Wakely |
| 20:57 | RE: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
| 18:14 | return vs simple_return | Michael Eager |
| 16:53 | Re:Etrade:-Account ALERT 589b56ad69ee39fc | 96808bankofamericaalerts mail. |
| 10:00 | Re: FW: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | David Brown |
| 09:38 | RE: A case exposing code sink issue | Jiangning Liu |
| 06:59 | c preprocessor feature suggestion | R A |
| 06:48 | FW: a nifty feature for c preprocessor | R A |
December 27, 2011
| 09:10 | RE: A case exposing code sink issue | Jiangning Liu |
December 26, 2011
| 21:42 | NYC: Moving and other jobs from 19$/hour/man on van+19$/truck-no hidden fees,discounts for 7th and latest hours of jobtime or fix rate for whole jobs | admin |
December 25, 2011
| 02:07 | Re: gcc-4.7-20111224 is now available | Miles Bader |
December 24, 2011
| 23:04 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Gabriel Dos Reis |
| 22:43 | gcc-4.7-20111224 is now available | gccadmin |
| 15:10 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Miles Bader |
| 11:08 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Paolo Carlini |
| 11:05 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Paolo Carlini |
| 10:59 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Jonathan Wakely |
| 10:52 | Re: non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Paolo Carlini |
| 02:04 | non-virtual-destructor warnings redux | Miles Bader |
December 23, 2011
| 22:47 | gcc-4.6-20111223 is now available | gccadmin |
| 14:19 | Re: NSDMI bug? | Miles Bader |
| 12:40 | Re: NSDMI bug? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:07 | NSDMI bug? | Miles Bader |
| 07:43 | Re: Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
| 03:20 | Re: Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Ye Joey |
December 22, 2011
| 22:48 | gcc-4.5-20111222 is now available | gccadmin |
| 17:44 | Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) | Joseph S. Myers |
| 17:13 | Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) | Gary Funck |
| 11:08 | Re: A case exposing code sink issue | Richard Guenther |
| 08:26 | RE: A case exposing code sink issue | Jiangning Liu |
December 21, 2011
| 19:00 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 18:07 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jonathan Wakely |
| 18:03 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jonathan Wakely |
| 17:07 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Patrick Marlier |
| 16:43 | Re: Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 15:16 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Martin Jambor |
| 14:11 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Aldy Hernandez |
| 03:26 | Which Binutils should I use for performing daily regression test on trunk? | Terry Guo |
| 02:01 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jim Avera |
| 01:53 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Matt Davis |
December 20, 2011
| 22:43 | gcc-4.4-20111220 is now available | gccadmin |
| 16:54 | Re: Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous | Peter A. Felvegi |
| 14:28 | Re: Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous | Jonathan Wakely |
| 14:21 | Re: Help with generating 'memset' for loop initialization | Richard Guenther |
| 13:31 | Misleading error if the type in catch() is ambiguous | Peter A. Felvegi |
| 13:23 | Help with generating 'memset' for loop initialization | Rohit Arul Raj |
| 13:22 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:47 | Re: Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Segher Boessenkool |
| 00:42 | Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect | Jim Avera |
December 19, 2011
| 16:24 | NYC: Moving and other jobs from 19$ per man on van/truck/hour,discounts for 7th and latest hours of jobtime or fix rate for whole jobs | support |
| 12:05 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Matt Davis |
| 09:43 | Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Martin Jambor |
| 04:22 | Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
December 18, 2011
| 02:57 | Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter | Matt Davis |
December 17, 2011
| 22:42 | gcc-4.7-20111217 is now available | gccadmin |
December 16, 2011
| 22:48 | gcc-4.6-20111216 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:36 | RE: GCC Account | Iyer, Balaji V |
| 18:01 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Rainer Orth |
| 14:23 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Joseph S. Myers |
| 14:17 | Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals | Joseph S. Myers |
| 08:36 | RE: add and compare combination | BELBACHIR Selim |
| 06:16 | Re: How to change the search path for header files | Ian Lance Taylor |
December 15, 2011
| 23:54 | How to change the search path for header files | extraordinary |
| 22:48 | gcc-4.5-20111215 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:48 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Patrick Marlier |
| 20:08 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Jack Howarth |
| 18:04 | Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility | Jeffrey Yasskin |
| 17:02 | Re: [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Torvald Riegel |
| 15:51 | [4.7,trans-mem] Summary of unsolved known bugs | Patrick Marlier |
| 15:48 | OpenACC | Daniel Reynolds |
| 15:21 | [pph] Merge from trunk | Diego Novillo |
| 15:12 | add and compare combination | BELBACHIR Selim |
| 14:58 | Re: question on behavior of tree-ssa-ccp | Richard Guenther |
| 14:33 | Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 14:02 | Re: question on behavior of tree-ssa-ccp | Amker.Cheng |
| 13:41 | question on behavior of tree-ssa-ccp | Amker.Cheng |
December 14, 2011
| 23:55 | Re: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Gabriel Dos Reis |
| 20:08 | Re: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Diego Novillo |
| 20:02 | Re: ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Jason Merrill |
| 19:36 | ICE in cp/semantics.c:cxx_eval_indirect_ref | Diego Novillo |
| 18:39 | Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems | Joel Sherrill |
| 16:58 | GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - 2nd Call for Abstracts and Participation | Diego Novillo |
| 12:03 | RE: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems | Henderson, Stuart |
| 10:55 | Re: a new write after approval maintainer | Kaz Kojima |
| 10:29 | Re: a new write after approval maintainer | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 06:08 | Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems | Denis Chertykov |
| 02:24 | a new write after approval maintainer | Kaz Kojima |
| 01:34 | add link | Mike |
December 13, 2011
December 12, 2011
December 11, 2011
| 23:14 | Ad: Fix PR middle-end/45416, missing opt for (a&(1<<C))!=0 to (a>>C)&1 | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 22:44 | Re: warn about deprecated access declarations | Jonathan Wakely |
| 22:23 | warn about deprecated access declarations | Fabien Chêne |
| 14:58 | Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h | Christian Joensson |
December 10, 2011
| 22:46 | gcc-4.7-20111210 is now available | gccadmin |
| 15:25 | HeyJustin | JB |
| 01:49 | Re: Obtaining the arguments to a function pointer | Matt Davis |
| 01:40 | Re: Obtaining the arguments to a function pointer | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 01:24 | Obtaining the arguments to a function pointer | Matt Davis |
December 09, 2011
| 22:43 | gcc-4.6-20111209 is now available | gccadmin |
| 21:45 | Various problems building on x86_64 OpenBSD | Kyle Markley |
| 17:36 | Re: dse2 remove wrong insn | Andrew Haley |
| 16:49 | RE: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? | Bingfeng Mei |
| 16:11 | Re: dse2 remove wrong insn | Jeff Law |
| 16:08 | Re: GCC Account | Jeff Law |
| 15:32 | GCC Account | Iyer, Balaji V |
| 15:21 | Re: dse2 remove wrong insn | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 15:05 | dse2 remove wrong insn | BELBACHIR Selim |
| 14:36 | RE: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? | Bingfeng Mei |
| 10:34 | Re: middle end generated builtin functions passing to backend problem | Feng LI |
December 08, 2011
December 07, 2011
December 06, 2011
December 05, 2011
| 21:53 | Re: Broken link | Jonathan Wakely |
| 21:44 | Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection | Jeff Law |
| 20:41 | Re: Creating a structure at compile time. | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 18:18 | Re: Dimensions of array parameters | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:10 | Re: libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h | Diego Novillo |
| 13:51 | Re: Broken link | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:53 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Guenther |
| 11:18 | Broken link | Marco Antonio Gómez Martín |
| 09:10 | Re: Dimensions of array parameters | Ludovic Courtès |
| 08:50 | Re: Links to release criteria? | Richard Guenther |
December 04, 2011
| 19:46 | Re: Links to release criteria? | Joern Rennecke |
| 17:16 | Re: Links to release criteria? | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 13:33 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Guenther |
| 03:46 | Re: Creating a structure at compile time. | Matt Davis |
December 03, 2011
| 22:47 | gcc-4.7-20111203 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:56 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Henderson |
| 14:30 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Richard Guenther |
| 12:16 | Is ada's "make install" parallel-safe? | Dave Korn |
| 02:59 | Re: Simplification of relational operations (was [patch for PR18942]) | Maxim Kuvyrkov |
| 00:54 | Re: libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h | Andrew MacLeod |
| 00:00 | libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h | Diego Novillo |
December 02, 2011
December 01, 2011
| 23:26 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Joseph S. Myers |
| 22:45 | gcc-4.5-20111201 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:36 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 21:41 | Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 21:09 | Parallel build error | Richard Henderson |
| 20:32 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Eric Botcazou |
| 20:10 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Steven Bosscher |
| 18:42 | Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline | Joseph S. Myers |
| 17:26 | Re: C++ memory model... What to do with libatomic | Richard Henderson |
| 17:00 | Warning for functions called before declared inline | Steven Bosscher |
| 15:45 | Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? | Richard Guenther |
| 10:12 | Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? | Amker.Cheng |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]