This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Need to correct the function declaration.

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: James Dennett <james dot dennett at gmail dot com>
Cc: niXman <i dot nixman at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 07:09:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Need to correct the function declaration.
References: <CAMPTgK05hE5n=AsfALm5cmJe0OrDHoefKD3RorJScbo1cBbzOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKNGpgp=wb=B8c+10Mm9rUwPP0gkwxu26B53OCO4R9HQcV898g@mail.gmail.com>

On 7 November 2011 03:02, James Dennett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:55 PM, niXman wrote:
>> When I try to build gcc-trunk on OpenBSD-5.0(gcc-4.2.1), I get the
>> following error:
>>> gcc-4.6.2/i686-pc-openbsd5.0/libstdc++-v3/include/mutex:818:64: error:
>>> ? invalid conversion from 'void (*)(...)' to 'void (*)()' [-fpermissive]
>>
>> Please add the void into arguments list for function __once_proxy();,
>> in file mutex:799.
>
> This source file is C++, not C, and so adding "void' should be a no-op.
>
> What makes you believe that this is the problem? ?Could you show the
> line where the error occurs?

Same problem on AIX:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982#c36

I have no idea why that makes a difference, but I can check in the change.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need to correct the function declaration.
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Need to correct the function declaration.
  - From: niXman
- Re: Need to correct the function declaration.
  - From: James Dennett

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]