This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++11 no longer experimental
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg dot endo at t-online dot de>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Nathan Ridge <zeratul976 at hotmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:59:55 +0100
- Subject: Re: C++11 no longer experimental
- References: <BLU162-W198148B0149AEE08F2A31D960D0@phx.gbl> <CAH6eHdRyQvh2eibPy+W8DELJu0_8ndqJbJYZ9Zd1KVGs=vpe2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdQ2eXmCZ5P7t189OiWiFCzWbtRRM3DtCc9RrpnuNBZ-Yw@mail.gmail.com> <20110921182543.GA31859@synopsys.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110301411500.3250@gerinyyl.fvgr>
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 14:14 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> + <p>C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which then
> + was released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features
> + into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to
> implement new C++0x features in GCC and to make it one of the first
> compilers to bring C++0x to C++ programmers.</p>
Since C++11 is now the official name, wouldn't it be better to use the
new name instead of the old one after the initial historical
introduction? :)
Like...
C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which was then
released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features
into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to
implement new C++11 features in GCC and to make it one of the first
compilers to bring C++11 to C++ programmers.
Cheers,
Oleg