This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:41:19 -0500
Subject: Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
References: <20111018171201.361304028ab94f102f827bd2@starynkevitch.net> <mcr62jm5kcb.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20111018191350.470cd6b1cd291373d5ff3f2c@starynkevitch.net>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:

> And in my perception, auto_ptr are a poor man's way of implementing a garbage collection,
> it is not a way to avoid it.

I saw several mentions of smart pointers, and no mention -- except in
this message I am replying to -- of auto_ptr.

I also think you should not read too much into "manual storage management".

References:
- adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]