This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GAS GCC FAQ query

From: Jon Grant <jg at jguk dot org>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 23:20:16 +0100
Subject: Re: GAS GCC FAQ query
References: <BANLkTimsD0uvL_tqY9=nLXwCJ8QPbHG8FA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinAD86ASCxbMevLo5-gJVgrnz6s7A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC457C4.8090505@jguk.org> <BANLkTiniV6Qh=Hz24gVO+6RpwydJ2tpwhg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1105081454570.3911@gerinyyl.fvgr>

Gerald Pfeifer wrote, On 08/05/11 14:02:

On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I would propose to clarify as:

"To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (or the GNU linker),"
I see no harm in that change, Gerald, what do you think?
Agreed.  Things would have been different twenty years ago, but these
days using linker is a lot more natural and common (as a grep in gcc/doc
confirms, too).
I went ahead and applied the patch below. Thanks for suggesting this!

Great the change has been made Gerald, Jonathan, thank you.

Best regards, Jon

References:
- GAS GCC FAQ query
  - From: Jon Grant
- Re: GAS GCC FAQ query
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: GAS GCC FAQ query
  - From: Jon Grant
- Re: GAS GCC FAQ query
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: GAS GCC FAQ query
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]