This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:01:53 +0200
Subject: Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
References: <BANLkTinU_844_HU-ExYx_TT6cwYjRuXhZw@mail.gmail.com> <201104191515.48961.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1104191551440.1989@wotan.suse.de> <201104191551.29876.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Hmpf. ?Strange. ?I've bootstrapped with all languages except Ada
>> yesterday, with gold as plugin-ld.
>
> GNU ld (with plugins) for me, but --enable-checking=yes,rtl. ?Maybe H.J. had
> e.g. --enable-checking=release. ?In any case, something is brittle ATM.

Not really unexpected - LTO testing coverage is pretty low unless we force
everyone to do LTO bootstraps (and then LTO bootstrap is slow because
of the redundant linking for the checksums and re-optimizing libbackend.a
all the time).

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]