This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:35:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
References: <AANLkTi=-PdaK2bni1d7ucHNNP2nSiDeJrnfET-ueaCvF@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikxo7955t51av28NhGt4VhA89TyFE6WNPjd_eNE@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinP2BzdG+fnO7n=5p+hvaU_VZ+-HyDLNn2Wy2J=@mail.gmail.com> <4D8A2403.5050708@redhat.com> <AANLkTimDRZ94xrA4OPziT7+X-bPK3xfAptTELFpVn-eR@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/25/2011 11:13 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:

Let's say that I want to imitate 'exactly' the behavior of the
range-for, but with a plain old for (there are plenty of reasons for
that):

Note that there was already a special case for arrays.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas

References:
- [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]