This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Pruning for torture tests?

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Cc: IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Janis Johnson <janis dot marie dot johnson at gmail dot com>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Pruning for torture tests?
References: <5A40FB01-90F9-44FD-B6A1-1982868A27AD@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <yddpqphd6b5.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <98CC300F-C8A3-4807-B4A8-4D3A490FC5E9@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <yddei5xd56w.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:

> indeed, and I wouldn't certainly advocate moving the tests around, just
> using a different dg-based driver for the torture testsuites.

gcc.c-torture/compile.exp was moved to using the dg driver a long time 
ago, moving the others (so that .x files are no longer needed, and so that 
people don't get confused and add dg- directives to individual tests that 
have no effect - PR 20567) certainly seems like a good idea.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: Pruning for torture tests?
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: Pruning for torture tests?
  - From: IainS
- Re: Pruning for torture tests?
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]