This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Building Secondary Languages After Newlib is Installed


On 01/28/2011 04:17 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwab<schwab@redhat.com> writes:

Ralf Corsepius<ralf.corsepius@rtems.org> writes:

- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
--with-newlib and adjust their configury accordingly.  This would put
them in a position where they actually are using newlib but are told
that they are not.  It might well be that they will do feature tests and
come up with the right result, but I am frankly skeptical that this will
happen with libstdc++-v3 at least, as it does do specific target tests.
OK, something in need to be looked into (I haven't in recent times).

However, as RTEMS is defacto tied to newlib and rtems-gccs could be made compilable without --with/without-newlib + external newlib.

Ralf




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]