This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Roman Kononov <roman at binarylife dot net>
Cc: James Dennett <james dot dennett at gmail dot com>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:13:47 -0600
Subject: Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant
References: <20101130143334.1b3f172b@abend.internal.xtremedata.com> <AANLkTi=R+dt8MVJhSZUUhJsyATi_qfjRnv5qFd9TA5pK@mail.gmail.com> <20101130145301.0f59efee@abend.internal.xtremedata.com> <AANLkTi=qCUhisO4E2tsjGvJeJ1A3SRdk1aqPJKiaOi8z@mail.gmail.com> <20101130151147.6d4db979@abend.internal.xtremedata.com>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Roman Kononov <roman@binarylife.net> wrote:
> 2010-11-30 13:03 CST, James Dennett <james.dennett@gmail.com> said:
>>
>>If you want to be able to change an object during its lifetime, don't
>>make it const.
>
> I exactly want to be unable to change an object during its lifetime
> except when it is moved-and-destroyed.

isn't that a question for C++ forums?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant
  - From: Roman Kononov

References:
- [c++0x] cannot return a constant
  - From: Roman Kononov
- Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant
  - From: Roman Kononov
- Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant
  - From: James Dennett
- Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant
  - From: Roman Kononov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]