This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions
- From: roy rosen <roy dot 1rosen at gmail dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:39:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions
- References: <AANLkTimMzs4CDEeB4TTff61q=o9FZoPDRLqBQc20HSSR@mail.gmail.com> <mcr39rtt716.fsf@google.com> <AANLkTimu4wKmkXUsZoceL=aDRGbB6eWyoU8aoOG7kPq7@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinuJopmb4Gvgj8EJ8LWYT3xg7EfA8pUGUffo8WP@mail.gmail.com> <mcrd3qxrl0b.fsf@google.com>
Is there any another way to give attributes to inline assembly insns?
2010/10/26 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
> roy rosen <roy.1rosen@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> If I want the compiler to understand the inline assembly is it
>> possible to write define_insn which would match the pattern that GCC
>> creates for the inline assembly and then GCC would be able to 'know'
>> some attributes about this insn and would be able to parallelize it?
>
> No, sorry. ?Inline asms are not looked up in the MD file.
>
> Ian
>