This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data
- From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim dot tjernlund at transmode dot se>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:44:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data
- References: <OFF406B9B7.50DB18C1-ONC12577B3.0070B011-C12577B3.0072F44F@transmode.se> <4CAB94B3.6050900@redhat.com> <OFA4A1D881.1D4EFD3D-ONC12577B3.00764974-C12577B3.0077094E@transmode.se> <20101005221926.GB29181@bubble.grove.modra.org> <OFE81F0B36.9C6A64B9-ONC12577B8.002D5630-C12577B8.003347B2@transmode.se> <20101011125845.GT26553@bubble.grove.modra.org> <OFB53662B0.C84CB86F-ONC12577BA.003109C3-C12577BA.00317E80@LocalDomain> <OF5CBF32FC.7306A2E7-ONC12577BC.004C4412-C12577BC.004C6790@LocalDomain> <OF09FC240D.33DF0059-ONC12577C8.007C2188-C12577C8.007C467C@transmode.se> <4CC769DC.4070503@gmail.com> <20101027020150.GC31277@bubble.grove.modra.org> <OFBB19E3F4.D971D3F5-ONC12577C9.002508EC-C12577C9.00255A03@transmode.se> <4CC81404.2000808@gmail.com>
Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote on 2010/10/27 13:59:00:
>
> On 27/10/2010 07:47, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote on 2010/10/27 04:01:50:
> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:53:00AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >>> On 26/10/2010 23:37, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Everything went dead quiet the minute I stated to send patches, what did
> >>>> I do wrong?
> >>> Nothing, you just ran into the lack-of-manpower problem. Sorry! And I
> >>> can't even help, I'm not a ppc maintainer.
> >> I also cannot approve gcc patches.
> >
> > Sent it to gcc-patches too. I already sent another gcc patch there but that didn't
> > trigger any response either.
> > Perhaps you can notify whoever that can approve patches?
>
> We have a convention on the patches list; if a patch hasn't gotten an answer
> after ten to fourteen days or so, send a reply to the original post, adding
> "[PING]" to the beginning of the subject line. (Sometimes it can take two or
> three pings, unfortunately that's just a consequence of our limited resources.)
>
> I see your first patch was posted on the 19th. Give it another few days,
> then ping it. When you do so, you could also mention your other patch at the
> same time.
One ping and a few days later and nothing. Very frustrating. I don't
believe all PPC devs are so "busy" that none has the time to look
at a simple one liner. What is up?
Jocke