gcc archive
date index for November, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2010
23:34 Re: [c++0x] inconsistent behaviour with defaulted move constructor Jonathan Wakely
23:27 Re: operator new[] overflow (PR 19351) Joe Buck
22:56 gcc-4.4-20101130 is now available gccadmin
22:52 [c++0x] inconsistent behaviour with defaulted move constructor Roman Kononov
22:38 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Ian Lance Taylor
21:53 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Jonathan Wakely
21:49 Re: operator new[] overflow (PR 19351) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:45 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Gabriel Dos Reis
21:38 Re: operator new[] overflow (PR 19351) Joseph S. Myers
21:34 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Roman Kononov
21:20 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Jonathan Wakely
21:19 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Roman Kononov
21:13 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Gabriel Dos Reis
21:13 operator new[] overflow (PR 19351) Florian Weimer
21:12 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Roman Kononov
21:10 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Gabriel Dos Reis
21:06 Re: [Patch,quadmath] PR 46543: Add first documentation Joseph S. Myers
21:05 Re: [Patch,quadmath] PR 46543: Add first documentation Joseph S. Myers
21:03 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant James Dennett
21:03 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Roman Kononov
20:53 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Roman Kononov
20:47 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Jonathan Wakely
20:40 Re: [c++0x] cannot return a constant Jonathan Wakely
20:34 Re: [Patch,quadmath] PR 46543: Add first documentation Andreas Schwab
20:33 [c++0x] cannot return a constant Roman Kononov
19:51 [Patch,quadmath] PR 46543: Add first documentation Tobias Burnus
19:04 ppc: const data not in RO section Joakim Tjernlund
17:40 Re: Build problems on AIX Piotr Wyderski
17:25 Build problems on AIX Piotr Wyderski
16:07 Re: Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Ian Lance Taylor
15:18 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Gabriel Dos Reis
15:08 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Miles Bader
14:58 Re: const char wd[6] = "Wednes", is that legal? Axel Freyn
14:56 EPIC9 Call for Papers (Chamonix, France, April 2nd or 3rd, 2011) Andrey Bokhanko
14:40 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Gabriel Dos Reis
14:40 const char wd[6] = "Wednes", is that legal? Joakim Tjernlund
14:36 Re: Revisit of pr38212 regarding restrict definition Richard Guenther
14:34 RE: Revisit of pr38212 regarding restrict definition Bingfeng Mei
14:07 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Roman Kononov
13:53 Re: Revisit of pr38212 regarding restrict definition Richard Guenther
13:08 Revisit of pr38212 regarding restrict definition Bingfeng Mei
12:00 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Miles Bader
11:52 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Marc Glisse
11:39 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Richard Guenther
09:05 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Miles Bader
08:48 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Gabriel Dos Reis
08:34 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Miles Bader
08:25 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Gabriel Dos Reis
08:18 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Miles Bader
08:13 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Gabriel Dos Reis
06:26 Re: Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Andrew Pinski
05:51 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Miles Bader
02:50 Re: IRA undoing sched1 Vladimir Makarov
01:53 IRA undoing sched1 Paul Koning
00:20 Re: Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Ian Lance Taylor

November 29, 2010
23:25 Re: vector extension bug? Ian Lance Taylor
23:24 Re: configure related issue: syntax error near unexpected token `c++ Andreas Schwab
22:53 Re: configure related issue: syntax error near unexpected token `c++ Ian Lance Taylor
22:50 Re: Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Gabriel Dos Reis
22:47 Re: gcc enumeration print support Ian Lance Taylor
21:43 Re: Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Marc Glisse
21:33 Re: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Roman Kononov
21:26 Re: Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Andrew Pinski
21:24 Fw: new requirement of "constexpr" for static const float data members is too restrictive Roman Kononov
19:53 Re: best data extraction for SSE2 emulation? Ian Lance Taylor
18:27 vector extension bug? David Mathog
16:52 best data extraction for SSE2 emulation? David Mathog
15:04 Mixing simple & complex IPA passes...? Basile Starynkevitch
10:54 Re: configure related issue: syntax error near unexpected token `c++ Andreas Schwab
10:08 Re: profiledbootstrap fails in java with "error: verification failed at PC=8: branch out of range" Andrew Haley
09:30 configure related issue: syntax error near unexpected token `c++ Basile Starynkevitch
08:45 Re: GCC Bugzilla with Firefox 3.6.12 Tobias Burnus
06:59 gcc enumeration print support jovi zhang
01:40 GCC Bugzilla with Firefox 3.6.12 John David Anglin

November 28, 2010
19:58 AstroTown - Science Fiction Saulo Fonseca
19:47 gcc-4.3-20101128 is now available gccadmin
19:12 ftp.net mirror of gcc.gnu.org is broken Gerald Pfeifer
17:59 Re: Possible issue with c++ linking with g++ Ralf Wildenhues
17:50 Possible issue with c++ linking with g++ Param Ponnaiyan
03:02 Re: std::move() does not move a constant of a class type Roman Kononov
02:22 Re: std::move() does not move a constant of a class type Roman Kononov
00:37 Re: std::move() does not move a constant of a class type James Dennett
00:13 std::move() does not move a constant of a class type Roman Kononov

November 27, 2010
23:12 gcc-4.6-20101127 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: Miss head file diagnostic.h in plugin.h? Ehren Metcalfe
17:43 Re: Miss head file diagnostic.h in plugin.h? Joseph S. Myers
14:28 Re: extern "C" applied liberally? Jonathan Wakely
07:54 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new mirror in Tampa, US Gerald Pfeifer
06:33 Miss head file diagnostic.h in plugin.h? Mingjie Xing

November 26, 2010
23:32 Re: profiledbootstrap fails in java with "error: verification failed at PC=8: branch out of range" Richard Guenther
23:12 Re: profiledbootstrap fails in java with "error: verification failed at PC=8: branch out of range" Uros Bizjak
22:17 re: extern "C" applied liberally? Jay K
18:08 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Henderson
18:08 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Paul Koning
09:24 Re: profiledbootstrap fails in java with "error: verification failed at PC=8: branch out of range" Andrew Haley
06:57 Re: Loop-iv.c ICEs on subregs Maxim Kuvyrkov
00:51 Re: Loop-iv.c ICEs on subregs Zdenek Dvorak

November 25, 2010
23:25 profiledbootstrap fails in java with "error: verification failed at PC=8: branch out of range" Uros Bizjak
22:59 gcc-4.5-20101125 is now available gccadmin
22:35 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors konrad
21:58 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
16:17 GCC 4.5.2 Status Report (2010-11-25) Richard Guenther
14:11 Call for paper / GNU development room @ FOSDEM Dodji Seketeli
11:31 HPPA - strange notes added. Nick Hudson
11:30 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? Rainer Orth
10:33 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
02:13 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Dave Korn
02:08 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Dave Korn

November 24, 2010
22:26 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? Ian Lance Taylor
22:24 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
22:02 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
21:31 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
21:23 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Paul Koning
21:17 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? David Mathog
21:04 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
20:03 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
19:28 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? Ian Lance Taylor
18:20 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? David Mathog
17:58 Re: Boostrap failures on Solaris at gcc/toplev.c stage2 compilation Joseph S. Myers
16:31 Boostrap failures on Solaris at gcc/toplev.c stage2 compilation Art Haas
15:32 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
15:22 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
15:09 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Nathan Froyd
15:05 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joseph S. Myers
15:02 Possible GCC bug. Simon Hill
14:48 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Pedro Alves
14:44 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Diego Novillo
14:38 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
14:33 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Diego Novillo
14:17 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
14:12 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
13:51 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
13:45 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
13:39 Re: Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode Mohamed Shafi
13:22 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Pedro Alves
12:57 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
12:01 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Paul Koning
11:45 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Richard Guenther
09:44 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
09:01 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
00:13 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? Ian Lance Taylor

November 23, 2010
23:17 Re: GCC Intermodule Analysis for Go Ian Lance Taylor
23:07 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? David Mathog
22:58 gcc-4.4-20101123 is now available gccadmin
22:22 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog
22:05 GCC Intermodule Analysis for Go Matt Davis
22:00 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog
21:47 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog
21:37 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog
21:21 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
20:35 Re: RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joseph S. Myers
20:23 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog
20:10 RFD: hookizing BITS_PER_UNIT in tree optimizers / frontends Joern Rennecke
17:07 Loop-iv.c ICEs on subregs Maxim Kuvyrkov
16:30 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
02:37 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 Ian Lance Taylor
00:32 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog

November 22, 2010
23:07 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 Xinliang David Li
22:53 Re: Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 Ian Lance Taylor
22:33 Method to disable code SSE2 generation but still use -msse2 David Mathog
17:38 Re: more robust debug_bb? Diego Novillo
17:32 Re: more robust debug_bb? Ian Lance Taylor
17:23 Re: more robust debug_bb? Basile Starynkevitch
16:28 Re: more robust debug_bb? Richard Guenther
15:43 more robust debug_bb? Basile Starynkevitch
15:37 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
09:59 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
09:59 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
09:08 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
08:57 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
08:54 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
08:49 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
08:43 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
08:33 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Jorge PEREZ

November 21, 2010
19:52 gcc-4.3-20101121 is now available gccadmin
13:40 Add static size report when using -fstack-usage for ARM targets Thomas Klein

November 20, 2010
22:59 gcc-4.6-20101120 is now available gccadmin
06:44 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Arnaud Lacombe
06:37 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Arnaud Lacombe
06:03 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Arnaud Lacombe
05:21 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ralf Wildenhues
04:58 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Arnaud Lacombe
03:43 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Arnaud Lacombe
03:17 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Arnaud Lacombe
01:55 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ian Lance Taylor
00:25 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Jack Howarth
00:00 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ian Lance Taylor

November 19, 2010
23:52 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Jack Howarth
23:45 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ian Lance Taylor
22:55 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Richard Guenther
22:35 Re: ICE on Cygwin [trunk] Angelo Graziosi
21:46 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ian Lance Taylor
21:39 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Jack Howarth
21:34 new mirror in Tampa, US Peter Vrzak
21:23 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ian Lance Taylor
20:36 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Jack Howarth
20:17 Re: gccgo branch and darwin Ian Lance Taylor
20:10 RE: gccgo branch and darwin Jack Howarth
19:56 gccgo branch and darwin Jack Howarth
19:07 Re: Should "restrictness" be preserved over function linling and casting? Ian Lance Taylor
19:07 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Geert Bosch
19:05 Re: Should "restrictness" be preserved over function linling and casting? Xinliang David Li
19:03 Re: Method to test all sse2 calls? Ian Lance Taylor
18:04 P.S.: Updated: RFA: Fix middle-end/46500 (void * encapsulated) Joern Rennecke
17:18 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
17:13 Should "restrictness" be preserved over function linling and casting? Bingfeng Mei
16:58 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Joel Sherrill
16:55 Go frontend merge status Ian Lance Taylor
16:54 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
16:53 Method to test all sse2 calls? David Mathog
15:08 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Tobias Burnus
14:41 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Rainer Orth
14:34 Re: How can I tell if BB can reach EXIT_BLOCK_PTR? Joern Rennecke
14:12 Re: How can I tell if BB can reach EXIT_BLOCK_PTR? Ian Lance Taylor
12:47 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Joern Rennecke
10:14 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Rainer Orth
08:46 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
07:26 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
07:10 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Tobias Burnus
04:22 How can I tell if BB can reach EXIT_BLOCK_PTR? H.J. Lu
03:57 m68hc11 maintainer? Joern Rennecke
00:23 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
00:19 Re: Handling labels in delay-slot scheduling Joern Rennecke
00:12 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka

November 18, 2010
23:29 Re: Handling labels in delay-slot scheduling Tom de Vries
22:55 gcc-4.5-20101118 is now available gccadmin
22:21 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joseph S. Myers
20:53 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Mark Wielaard
20:22 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Ralf Wildenhues
19:47 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joern Rennecke
19:25 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joseph S. Myers
19:11 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joern Rennecke
18:21 Re: Handling labels in delay-slot scheduling Jeff Law
18:20 Re: Possible improvement in inline stringop code generation Ian Lance Taylor
18:18 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joseph S. Myers
17:59 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joern Rennecke
17:58 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Dave Korn
17:55 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Arnaud Charlet
17:41 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
17:33 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Rainer Orth
17:31 Handling labels in delay-slot scheduling Tom de Vries
17:20 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Rainer Orth
17:19 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Ian Lance Taylor
17:18 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Mark Mitchell
17:16 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Diego Novillo
17:15 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
16:56 Re: RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joseph S. Myers
16:49 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Arnaud Charlet
16:42 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Joseph S. Myers
16:41 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Richard Guenther
16:36 RFC: Defining and using target vectors Joern Rennecke
16:21 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Tobias Burnus
16:02 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Diego Novillo
15:59 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Richard Guenther
15:42 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Michael Matz
15:37 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Mark Mitchell
15:23 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Jeff Law
14:31 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
14:24 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Joern Rennecke
13:42 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default H.J. Lu
13:28 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
13:17 Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Eric Botcazou
13:06 Re: abi/demangle/regression/cw-13.cc regressed Paolo Carlini
12:50 Re: abi/demangle/regression/cw-13.cc regressed H.J. Lu
12:02 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
12:01 Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors Konrad Eisele
11:58 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
11:48 Possible improvement in inline stringop code generation Jeremy Hall
11:35 abi/demangle/regression/cw-13.cc regressed Paolo Carlini
10:47 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Haley
09:23 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Mark Mitchell
07:11 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
06:50 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Ralf Wildenhues
03:21 Re: Maybe bug in call function to static declaration variable? Jonathan Wakely
03:06 Re: Maybe bug in call function to static declaration variable? Gilberto Cuba Ricardo
00:17 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor

November 17, 2010
21:49 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Tobias Burnus
21:27 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Rainer Orth
20:16 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Rainer Orth
20:06 Re: ICE on Cygwin [trunk] Tobias Burnus
19:54 ICE on Cygwin [trunk] Angelo Graziosi
19:31 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Ralf Wildenhues
19:20 Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Tobias Burnus
17:10 Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error Art Haas
16:01 Re: incompatible GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.1 libstdc++ ? Ian Lance Taylor
15:45 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Joern Rennecke
15:25 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Nathan Froyd
14:34 incompatible GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.1 libstdc++ ? Christophe Lyon
11:58 P.S.: Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks Joern Rennecke
04:06 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Joern Rennecke
03:45 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Ian Lance Taylor
03:22 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Joern Rennecke
03:04 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Nathan Froyd
02:40 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Paolo Bonzini
02:10 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Ian Lance Taylor
02:04 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Joern Rennecke
00:38 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Paolo Bonzini
00:36 RE: __ghtread_recursive_mutex_destroy missing Nicola Pero

November 16, 2010
22:53 gcc-4.4-20101116 is now available gccadmin
21:17 Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Ian Lance Taylor
21:02 Re: Mailing lists for back-end development? Mark Mitchell
19:17 CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization) Joern Rennecke
19:11 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joern Rennecke
19:00 Re: Mailing lists for back-end development? Dave Korn
18:54 Re: Mailing lists for back-end development? Diego Novillo
18:32 Re: Mailing lists for back-end development? Richard Henderson
18:08 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
17:34 Re: Mailing lists for back-end development? Andrew Pinski
17:29 Mailing lists for back-end development? Mark Mitchell
17:10 Invoking atomic functions from a C++ shared lib (or should I force linking with -lgcc?) Christophe Lyon
16:14 Re: decimal float, LIBGCC2_FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN, and ARM ABI issues Joseph S. Myers
15:43 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joern Rennecke
15:43 decimal float, LIBGCC2_FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN, and ARM ABI issues Nathan Froyd
14:35 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
14:35 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Nathan Froyd
14:23 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Ian Lance Taylor
10:12 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Richard Guenther
09:48 __ghtread_recursive_mutex_destroy missing Jonathan Wakely
09:00 Re: extern "C" applied liberally? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:26 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
06:56 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joern Rennecke
04:11 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jeff Law
02:18 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
01:51 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
01:45 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
01:39 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
01:24 Re: extern "C" applied liberally? Ian Lance Taylor
01:19 extern "C" applied liberally? Jay K
01:02 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
00:53 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
00:41 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
00:27 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
00:25 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka

November 15, 2010
23:39 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
23:37 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
23:08 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Richard Guenther
23:06 Re: textual prologue/epilogue Paolo Bonzini
22:59 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jeff Law
22:47 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
22:43 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
22:38 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
22:31 Re: non-algorithmic maintainers Zdenek Dvorak
22:25 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
22:16 Re: non-algorithmic maintainers Richard Guenther
22:11 Re: textual prologue/epilogue Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:08 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Richard Guenther
21:58 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Richard Guenther
21:50 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joern Rennecke
21:15 Re: textual prologue/epilogue Paul Koning
21:03 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Paolo Bonzini
21:01 non-algorithmic maintainers Paolo Bonzini
20:52 Re: reload_combine vs. exceptions Eric Botcazou
20:51 textual prologue/epilogue Paolo Bonzini
20:23 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
19:57 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
19:53 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Richard Henderson
19:51 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
19:22 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Linus Torvalds
19:13 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
19:11 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
19:11 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Linus Torvalds
18:59 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
18:57 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Linus Torvalds
18:52 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Ian Lance Taylor
18:47 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jeff Law
18:45 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joseph S. Myers
18:43 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jeff Law
18:38 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
18:31 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
18:26 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
18:18 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
18:10 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Linus Torvalds
17:55 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
17:45 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
17:41 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
17:37 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim Bos
17:09 Re: reload_combine vs. exceptions Andreas Schwab
17:06 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joern Rennecke
16:55 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
16:33 Re: reload_combine vs. exceptions Eric Botcazou
16:06 Re: reload_combine vs. exceptions Andreas Schwab
16:06 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Linus Torvalds
16:05 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
15:49 Re: RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joseph S. Myers
15:03 Re: reload_combine vs. exceptions Eric Botcazou
14:56 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions Joern Rennecke
14:40 Re: inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions roy rosen
12:29 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Andrey Belevantsev
12:04 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Christian Bruel
11:38 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
11:17 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
10:55 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
10:24 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Richard Guenther
10:03 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
09:29 RFC: semi-automatic hookization Joern Rennecke
09:20 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
09:13 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
08:56 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
06:28 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
03:28 Symbolic range analysis Hongtao Yu
03:23 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Linus Torvalds
01:27 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? James Cloos

November 14, 2010
23:57 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
21:12 reload_combine vs. exceptions Andreas Schwab
19:51 gcc-4.3-20101114 is now available gccadmin
15:43 Re: Maybe bug in call function to static declaration variable? Axel Freyn
14:48 Maybe bug in call function to static declaration variable? Gilberto Cuba Ricardo

November 13, 2010
23:15 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 H.J. Lu
23:07 gcc-4.6-20101113 is now available gccadmin
22:42 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
22:39 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Paolo Bonzini
21:09 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
19:41 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Peter Bergner
16:23 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? H.J. Lu
16:20 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Paolo Bonzini
16:10 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? H.J. Lu
16:01 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Paolo Bonzini
15:29 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? H.J. Lu
14:57 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Paolo Bonzini
14:35 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? H.J. Lu
11:15 [PATCH] i8k: Tell gcc that *regs gets clobbered Jim Bos
10:27 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Paolo Bonzini
07:47 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ralf Wildenhues
03:29 Re: graphite legacy-cloog/cloog-ppl benchmarks Jack Howarth
02:24 graphite legacy-cloog/cloog-ppl benchmarks Jack Howarth
00:36 Re: RTTI across .so boundaries Jonathan Wakely
00:20 RTTI across .so boundaries Витя Истомин

November 12, 2010
19:34 The Linux binutils 2.21.51.0.1 is released H.J. Lu
18:27 Re: A question about combining constraints Joern Rennecke
18:16 Re: A question about combining constraints Dave Korn
16:06 Re: A question about combining constraints Joern Rennecke
15:57 Re: A question about combining constraints Dave Korn
15:46 Re: unschedule insn functionality needed Ian Lance Taylor
15:45 Re: Target specific qualifiers in GNU C Ian Lance Taylor
15:44 Re: Discussion: Should GNU C implement bit types? Ian Lance Taylor
15:32 Re: A question about combining constraints Joern Rennecke
15:23 Re: A question about combining constraints Dave Korn
15:19 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Ian Lance Taylor
14:26 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? H.J. Lu
13:55 Re: A question about combining constraints Joern Rennecke
13:27 Re: A question about combining constraints Mohamed Shafi
13:08 Re: A question about combining constraints Joern Rennecke
12:51 A question about combining constraints Mohamed Shafi
12:01 Re: pipeline description Alex Turjan
11:51 unschedule insn functionality needed Alex Turjan
11:29 RE: How to debug when some rtx are wrongly reclaimed by garbage collector? Bingfeng Mei
11:28 Re: How to debug when some rtx are wrongly reclaimed by garbage collector? Laurynas Biveinis
11:25 Re: How to debug when some rtx are wrongly reclaimed by garbage collector? Andreas Schwab
11:22 Re: pipeline description Alexander Monakov
11:03 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Paul Brook
10:43 How to debug when some rtx are wrongly reclaimed by garbage collector? Bingfeng Mei
07:47 Target specific qualifiers in GNU C Georg Johann Lay
07:30 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Georg Johann Lay
07:05 Discussion: Should GNU C implement bit types? Georg Johann Lay
06:56 Re: Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Ian Lance Taylor
06:48 Discussion: What is unspec_volatile? Georg Johann Lay
06:48 Re: Vendor specific dwarf Ian Lance Taylor
06:36 Re: jump after return Ian Lance Taylor
06:26 Vendor specific dwarf Georg Johann Lay
03:55 jump after return Alain Ketterlin

November 11, 2010
23:20 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Ian Lance Taylor
22:50 gcc-4.5-20101111 is now available gccadmin
20:09 Re: Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces Michael Meissner
16:51 Re: pipeline description Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: PL/1 frontend Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 Re: PL/1 frontend Andi Hellmund
15:40 Re: PL/1 frontend Diego Novillo
15:38 Re: pipeline description roy rosen
15:26 Re: PL/1 frontend Andi Hellmund
14:55 Re: PL/1 frontend Diego Novillo
14:52 Re: PL/1 frontend Richard Guenther
14:47 PL/1 frontend Merrick, Thomas
12:39 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called David Brown
09:26 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Georg Johann Lay
08:57 gcc-4.5.0 built successfully from source James Womack
00:45 [CFP] Reminder: GCC Research Opportunities Workshop 2011 David Edelsohn

November 10, 2010
20:38 Re: Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces David Brown
20:29 Re: Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces David Brown
17:37 Re: Dedicated logical instructions Ian Lance Taylor
17:05 Re: Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces Paul Koning
16:55 Re: Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces Chris Lattner
16:53 Re: Dedicated logical instructions Uday P. Khedker
16:46 Re: Dedicated logical instructions Radu Hobincu
16:03 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
15:47 Re: Dedicated logical instructions Ian Lance Taylor
14:34 Re: Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces Andreas Krebbel
14:33 [gimplefe] Merge trunk r166509 Diego Novillo
14:02 Re: Dedicated logical instructions Radu Hobincu
12:01 Idea - big and little endian data areas using named address spaces David Brown
11:43 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
10:59 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
10:31 Re: define_split Andrew Stubbs
09:41 Re: software pipelining Andrey Belevantsev
09:32 software pipelining roy rosen
08:59 Re: define_split Paolo Bonzini
04:26 Opinion on a hardware feature for conditional instructions Mohamed Shafi

November 09, 2010
23:59 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
23:47 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
22:57 Re: define_split Michael Meissner
22:56 gcc-4.4-20101109 is now available gccadmin
22:54 Re: define_split Michael Meissner
20:53 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called David Brown
18:38 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
17:49 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Georg Lay
17:45 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Georg Lay
16:57 Re: define_split Paolo Bonzini
16:43 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim
16:37 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
16:36 Re: Merging gdc (Gnu D Compiler) into gcc Joe Buck
16:01 Re: Constant propagation and CSE Jeff Law
15:54 Re: define_split Paolo Bonzini
14:19 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Mike Frysinger
13:57 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andreas Schwab
13:48 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
13:09 Re: Merging gdc (Gnu D Compiler) into gcc Jakub Jelinek
13:00 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Michael Matz
09:36 Re: Merging gdc (Gnu D Compiler) into gcc Andrew Haley
09:21 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
07:38 Re: define_split roy rosen
07:22 Re: UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD roy rosen
01:14 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Peter Bergner

November 08, 2010
23:13 Re: Merging gdc (Gnu D Compiler) into gcc Walter Bright
22:47 Re: Merging gdc (Gnu D Compiler) into gcc Joseph S. Myers
22:15 Merging gdc (Gnu D Compiler) into gcc Walter Bright
20:50 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Dave Korn
20:47 Re: UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD Michael Meissner
20:41 Re: how much is the effort required to retarget gcc? Michael Meissner
20:27 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Michael Meissner
20:20 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called David Brown
20:17 Re: define_split Michael Meissner
18:15 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Dave Korn
17:42 Re: Dedicated logical instructions Ian Lance Taylor
15:59 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Georg Lay
15:20 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Richard Guenther
15:01 Re: named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Georg Lay
14:39 named address spaces: addr_space_convert never called Georg Lay
13:44 Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data Joakim Tjernlund
12:58 Re: integral overflow and integral conversions Joseph S. Myers
12:57 Re: asm_fprintf inefficiency? Paolo Bonzini
12:39 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Paolo Bonzini
12:36 Re: Why is -fstrict-aliasing excluded from function "optimize" attribute? Paolo Bonzini
12:20 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Michael Matz
11:54 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jakub Jelinek
11:48 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Paul Koning
11:21 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Richard Guenther
11:20 Dedicated logical instructions Radu Hobincu
11:20 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
10:54 Re: integral overflow and integral conversions Richard Guenther
10:49 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Richard Guenther
07:18 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Ralf Wildenhues
06:20 Re: integral overflow and integral conversions Jason Merrill
05:11 Re: integral overflow and integral conversions Ian Lance Taylor
04:40 integral overflow and integral conversions Jason Merrill
00:36 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Gerald Pfeifer

November 07, 2010
23:03 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
22:41 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andreas Schwab
22:07 Re: several SSH keys to access svn+ssh:gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
21:31 Re: gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
20:16 gcc-4.3-20101107 is now available gccadmin
18:45 several SSH keys to access svn+ssh:gcc.gnu.org Basile Starynkevitch

November 06, 2010
23:40 Re: build issue Jonathan Wakely
22:52 gcc-4.6-20101106 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Joseph S. Myers
21:47 Re: build issue François Dumont
20:33 Re: build issue François Dumont
20:00 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Eric Botcazou
17:01 Re: Changing PR to ASSIGNED doesn't assign to me automatically Jonathan Wakely
12:20 Cheers... jkgarrett1
03:39 Re: asm_fprintf Ian Lance Taylor
02:28 Re: value initialization and array data member Paolo Carlini
02:24 Re: value initialization and array data member Paolo Carlini
01:47 Re: value initialization and array data member Jason Merrill
01:28 RE: asm_fprintf Jay K
01:03 value initialization and array data member Gabriel Dos Reis

November 05, 2010
20:03 Re: Changing PR to ASSIGNED doesn't assign to me automatically H.J. Lu
19:59 Re: Tweaking the pathname for __FILE__ Ian Lance Taylor
19:54 Changing PR to ASSIGNED doesn't assign to me automatically Rainer Orth
19:42 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Benjamin Kosnik
18:55 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Diego Novillo
18:53 Re: Tweaking the pathname for __FILE__ Andreas Schwab
18:24 Tweaking the pathname for __FILE__ Paul Koning
18:19 Re: I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Dave Korn
18:00 I propose Ralf Wildenhues for build machinery maintainer Ian Lance Taylor
17:05 Re: Stage 3 question Joseph S. Myers
16:52 Re: Stage 3 question Paul Koning
16:32 Re: GCC vector extensions Richard Guenther
16:26 Re: GCC vector extensions Hariharan Sandanagobalane
15:18 Re: mach pass Jeff Law
15:01 Re: mach pass Ian Lance Taylor
15:00 Re: asm_fprintf inefficiency? Ian Lance Taylor
13:55 mach pass Abdul Wahid Memon
12:54 Re: GCC trunk revision 166285 passes SPEC CPU 2000/2006 Richard Guenther
12:43 GCC trunk revision 166285 passes SPEC CPU 2000/2006 H.J. Lu
07:10 asm_fprintf inefficiency? Jay K
05:07 Re: gcc (g++4.4.3) have no right to modify the name of my varialbe Ian Lance Taylor

November 04, 2010
23:45 Re: build issue Dave Korn
23:28 Re: build issue Paolo Carlini
22:55 gcc-4.5-20101104 is now available gccadmin
19:36 gcc (g++4.4.3) have no right to modify the name of my varialbe eric lin
19:23 Re: GCC vector extensions Ian Lance Taylor
18:38 Re: pipeline description Ian Lance Taylor
16:24 GCC vector extensions Hariharan Sandanagobalane
10:28 RE: Why is -fstrict-aliasing excluded from function "optimize" attribute? Bingfeng Mei
08:31 Re: Why is -fstrict-aliasing excluded from function "optimize" attribute? Andrew Haley
05:55 pipeline description roy rosen

November 03, 2010
21:16 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
21:07 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Joseph S. Myers
20:44 Re: Why is -fstrict-aliasing excluded from function "optimize" attribute? Richard Guenther
20:12 Re: Stage 3 question Ian Lance Taylor
20:04 Re: Stage 3 question Andrew Pinski
20:02 Stage 3 question Paul Koning
17:12 Re: Why is -fstrict-aliasing excluded from function "optimize" attribute? Andrew Haley
16:51 RE: Accessing http://www3.hmc.edu/~neldredge/yamd/ Mike.Jennings
16:51 Re: powerpc: What happened to lwzu/stwu in loops? Joakim Tjernlund
16:50 Why is -fstrict-aliasing excluded from function "optimize" attribute? Bingfeng Mei
16:44 Re: powerpc: What happened to lwzu/stwu in loops? Andrew Pinski
16:02 powerpc: What happened to lwzu/stwu in loops? Joakim Tjernlund
15:58 Biet thu sinh thai cach HN 40km . Dtich 721m2 - Gia 3 ty Nguyen The Anh
15:45 GCC 4.6.0 Development Stage 1 Ends Now, Stage 3 in effect immediately Richard Guenther
10:29 Re: dg-require-effective-target & gcc.c-torture suite Richard Guenther
09:51 RE: is gcc garbage collector compacting? Jay K
09:23 Re: is gcc garbage collector compacting? Basile Starynkevitch
08:19 RE: is gcc garbage collector compacting? Jay K
07:51 Re: is gcc garbage collector compacting? Basile Starynkevitch
07:00 is gcc garbage collector compacting? Jay K

November 02, 2010
22:59 gcc-4.4-20101102 is now available gccadmin
22:29 Re: dg-require-effective-target & gcc.c-torture suite Rainer Orth
22:23 dg-require-effective-target & gcc.c-torture suite Steve Ellcey
21:39 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
19:54 Re: not quite polymorphism Andrew Bell
19:46 Re: not quite polymorphism eric lin
19:35 Re: [pph] New branch for incremental C++ parsing Diego Novillo
19:21 [pph] New branch for incremental C++ parsing Diego Novillo
18:10 TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES on the SPARC Eric Botcazou
17:57 Re: Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes 3dw4rd
17:56 Re: Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes 3dw4rd
17:23 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Jonathan Wakely
17:05 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Nicola Pero
16:43 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default David Daney
16:25 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Jeff Law
15:32 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Tom Tromey
15:31 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Tom Tromey
15:14 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ed Smith-Rowland
15:09 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
14:09 Re: Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode Mohamed Shafi
14:02 Re: define_split Ian Lance Taylor
13:51 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Ian Lance Taylor
13:22 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Ian Lance Taylor
11:47 Re: define_split Joern Rennecke
11:41 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
11:36 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Joern Rennecke
10:52 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Paolo Bonzini
10:51 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Haley
10:51 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Paolo Bonzini
10:49 Re: ipa on all files together Richard Guenther
10:48 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Paolo Bonzini
10:46 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Paolo Bonzini
10:41 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
10:39 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
10:17 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Paolo Bonzini
10:14 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Laurent GUERBY
09:41 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
09:00 Re: peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead Georg Lay
08:22 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Eric Botcazou
08:19 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Nick Clifton
05:12 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Matthias Klose
05:01 Re: not quite polymorphism Ian Lance Taylor
03:58 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default H.J. Lu
03:39 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Jeff Law
03:35 not quite polymorphism eric lin
01:03 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Christopher Faylor
00:40 Re: ipa on all files together Hongtao
00:35 Re: ipa on all files together Diego Novillo

November 01, 2010
23:57 ipa on all files together Hongtao
23:56 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Alan Modra
22:34 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Richard Guenther
20:16 Re: how much is the effort required to retarget gcc? Ian Lance Taylor
20:07 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Richard Kenner
20:03 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Ian Lance Taylor
19:35 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default H.J. Lu
18:58 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Haley
18:18 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Diego Novillo
17:50 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Haley
17:46 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Tom Tromey
17:36 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Ian Lance Taylor
17:33 Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend Tom Tromey
17:19 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Daniel Jacobowitz
17:13 Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity Nick Clifton
16:31 Re: UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD H.J. Lu
16:28 Re: UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD Paul Brook
14:52 UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD roy rosen
14:52 Re: help debugging ICE in fortran testsuite (was: TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused?) Paul Koning
13:21 how much is the effort required to retarget gcc? Hui Yan Cheah
10:46 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Joern Rennecke
10:35 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Geert Bosch
10:31 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Dave Korn
10:11 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Dave Korn
09:50 Re: dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go Paul Brook
09:03 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Haley
08:59 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Haley
08:59 Re: [Bulk] Re: your (or Stroustrup) chapter.12.3.cpp (and 12.7.2.cpp)can not compile on my ubuntu/linux10.03 Jonathan Wakely
08:46 Re: [Bulk] Re: your (or Stroustrup) chapter.12.3.cpp (and 12.7.2.cpp)can not compile on my ubuntu/linux10.03 eric
04:30 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Joern Rennecke
04:06 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Geert Bosch
03:48 Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default Andrew Pinski


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3