This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Angelo Graziosi <angelo dot graziosi at alice dot it>
- Cc: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:42:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration
- References: <7400DFC8-DD7A-4AEF-B787-5D34693D98C8@gmail.com> <4C8A45DA.6060103@alice.it> <00431C64-D1E2-445C-A78F-4C9148D0C46F@gmail.com> <20100910162530.GA28759@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FACF497-A4DA-4ACA-A099-D60A0B7BD701@gmail.com> <20100910173112.GA41903@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4C8AB9B3.9070509@alice.it>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:05:23AM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Il 10/09/2010 19.31, Steve Kargl ha scritto:
> >The ideal solution would be incorporating libquad into libgfortran
>
> The ideal solution would be building GCC enabling QP with
>
> ./configure... --enable-quad....
>
> if the system allow for QP: in this case, perhaps, QP should be enabled
> by default.
>
Well, in my ideal world :-), you would not have a --enable-quad
option. If __float128 is supported, then you get REAL(16).
--
Steve