gcc archive
date index for September, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2010
23:00 gcc-4.5-20100930 is now available gccadmin
17:12 Re: secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers Georg Lay
12:37 GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2010-09-30) Richard Guenther
10:57 Re: Report: using GCC plugin to implement ORM for C++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:35 Report: using GCC plugin to implement ORM for C++ Boris Kolpackov
09:39 Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? Richard Guenther
09:05 secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers Alex Turjan
07:54 old aliasing bug: fixed? Albert Cahalan
00:24 Re: Handling NaNs in FP comparisons Richard Henderson

September 29, 2010
23:31 Handling NaNs in FP comparisons Michael Eager
23:02 Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions Jonathan Wakely
22:53 check_cxa_atexit_available Richard Henderson
21:47 Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches Nicola Pero
17:40 Re: Worse code generated by PRE Xinliang David Li
12:57 RE: Worse code generated by PRE Bingfeng Mei
12:33 Re: Worse code generated by PRE Richard Guenther
12:16 Worse code generated by PRE Bingfeng Mei
11:10 Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:49 Re: Bugzilla not whining [was Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT] Dave Korn
08:29 Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions Andrew Haley
07:07 Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions #SINHA SHARAD#

September 28, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.4-20100928 is now available gccadmin
21:24 Re: Bugzilla not whining [was Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT] Frédéric Buclin
20:35 Re: gcj fails to compile java Jack Howarth
19:55 Re: Microblaze port Michael Eager
19:21 Re: gcj fails to compile java Dr Andrew John Hughes
19:05 Re: Microblaze port Joel Sherrill
19:03 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Dave Korn
18:56 Re: Microblaze port Michael Eager
18:21 Microblaze port David Edelsohn
17:25 Re: Simple development GCC and G++ Michael Veksler
17:22 Re: split stack on darwin Ian Lance Taylor
17:07 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Richard Henderson
16:50 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Kai Tietz
16:41 Re: split stack on darwin IainS
16:29 Re: split stack on darwin Ian Lance Taylor
15:21 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Richard Henderson
15:13 Re: Bugzilla not whining [was Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT] Frédéric Buclin
13:34 split stack on darwin Jack Howarth
12:28 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Andrew Haley
11:13 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Dave Korn
10:44 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Andrew Haley
10:12 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Andrew Haley
10:09 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Kai Tietz
09:02 Bugzilla not whining [was Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT] Dave Korn
08:22 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Jakub Jelinek
06:54 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Kai Tietz
05:58 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Kai Tietz
03:42 RE: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Jay K
01:05 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Dave Korn
01:01 Re: 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Dave Korn
01:01 RE: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Jay K
00:29 64-bit pei vs dwarf2 Richard Henderson
00:28 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Dave Korn
00:05 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question DJ Delorie

September 27, 2010
23:22 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question Richard Henderson
23:21 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question DJ Delorie
22:44 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question Richard Henderson
22:37 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question DJ Delorie
22:33 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question Richard Henderson
22:09 Re: rx-elf: sched2 dependency question Ian Lance Taylor
20:59 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jack Howarth
20:30 rx-elf: sched2 dependency question DJ Delorie
18:09 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Neil Vachharajani
18:04 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Neil Vachharajani
16:13 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Richard Henderson
15:50 Re: Simple development GCC and G++ Basile Starynkevitch
15:03 Re: Simple development GCC and G++ Rick C. Hodgin
14:48 Re: Simple development GCC and G++ Paul Brook
14:30 Re: Simple development GCC and G++ Basile Starynkevitch
14:21 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Olivier Hainque
12:48 Simple development GCC and G++ Rick C. Hodgin
11:48 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Richard Guenther
11:39 RE: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Jay K
10:50 Re: signed/unsigned comparison warning level Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:47 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Luke A. Guest
10:38 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Andrew Haley
10:37 Re: eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Andrew Haley
10:33 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Olivier Hainque
10:27 Re: Alignment error Nick Clifton
10:09 Alignment error Thomas Joseph
09:38 Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Richard Guenther
09:36 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Luke A. Guest
09:12 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Olivier Hainque
08:01 Re: signed/unsigned comparison warning level David Brown
07:49 Re: signed/unsigned comparison warning level J Decker
05:51 Re: signed/unsigned comparison warning level J Decker
04:38 Re: signed/unsigned comparison warning level Ian Lance Taylor
03:50 signed/unsigned comparison warning level J Decker
01:25 Re: passing #define-d values to #define-d macros Nathan Froyd
01:16 Re: passing #define-d values to #define-d macros ir_idjit
01:09 passing #define-d values to #define-d macros ir_idjit
00:24 eliminating mpc/mpfr and reducing gmp Jay K

September 26, 2010
19:53 gcc-4.3-20100926 is now available gccadmin
18:52 Re: Polyhedron Fortran benchmark - compiler comparison: Good results for GCC 4.6 Steve Kargl
14:47 Polyhedron Fortran benchmark - compiler comparison: Good results for GCC 4.6 Tobias Burnus
14:37 Re: Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends Joseph S. Myers
14:31 Re: Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends Steven Bosscher
14:21 Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends FX
12:19 Re: -Os is weak... Gerald Pfeifer
04:32 Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Jason Merrill
02:02 Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Ian Lance Taylor

September 25, 2010
22:54 gcc-4.6-20100925 is now available gccadmin
20:56 Re: About DECL_UID Diego Novillo
20:52 Re: About DECL_UID Hongtao
20:48 Re: About DECL_UID Diego Novillo
20:40 About DECL_UID Hongtao
19:34 [Ada] SCIL file generation in the trunk Florian Weimer
15:30 Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Jonathan Wakely
15:20 Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Frédéric Buclin
15:10 Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Jonathan Wakely
15:03 Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? Jonathan Wakely
14:43 Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:28 Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? Steve Kargl
13:20 gcj fails to compile java Jack Howarth
08:46 Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? Jakub Jelinek
05:45 Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? Steve Kargl

September 24, 2010
22:46 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Luke A. Guest
22:40 Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Andrew Pinski
22:37 Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI Luke A. Guest
20:23 GCC 4.4.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
14:23 Re: gengtype indentation issues Ian Lance Taylor
10:00 Re: Choosing the best multiplication Paulo J. Matos
09:57 Re: Choosing the best multiplication Paulo J. Matos
09:33 Re: gengtype indentation issues Paolo Bonzini
09:30 Re: gengtype indentation issues Basile Starynkevitch
08:51 Re: gengtype indentation issues Paolo Bonzini
08:48 Re: Choosing the best multiplication Paolo Bonzini
08:11 Choosing the best multiplication Paulo J. Matos
07:56 Re: Calculation of RTX Costs Paulo J. Matos

September 23, 2010
22:55 gcc-4.5-20100923 is now available gccadmin
22:12 Re: Interprocedural points-to analysis Richard Guenther
22:09 Interprocedural points-to analysis Hongtao
19:24 Re: Calculation of RTX Costs Ian Lance Taylor
18:50 Re: gengtype indentation issues Ian Lance Taylor
18:35 Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches Nicola Pero
18:08 Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO Ralf Wildenhues
16:03 plugin headers no longer installed? Jack Howarth
15:12 Re: Where are the new GCC releases? Eric Botcazou
15:06 Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches Joseph S. Myers
14:49 Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Art Haas
14:17 Re: gengtype indentation issues Diego Novillo
13:54 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
13:53 gengtype indentation issues Basile Starynkevitch
13:06 Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches Nicola Pero
10:48 Re: Calculation of RTX Costs Paulo J. Matos
06:17 Re: Where are the new GCC releases? Jakub Jelinek
05:27 Re: Where are the new GCC releases? Eric Botcazou
01:01 Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO t66667 at gmail dot com

September 22, 2010
23:44 Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Rodrigo Rivas
22:06 [PATCH] for Re: new mirror Gerald Pfeifer
20:18 RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Hargett, Matt
19:35 Re: Where are the new GCC releases? Jakub Jelinek
19:15 Re: Where are the new GCC releases? Joe Buck
19:02 Re: Where are the new GCC releases? Richard Guenther
17:50 Where are the new GCC releases? Artem S. Tashkinov
08:12 Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Rodrigo Rivas
02:41 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland
02:39 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland

September 21, 2010
23:54 Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Ed Smith-Rowland
23:05 Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Rodrigo Rivas
22:57 gcc-4.4-20100921 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Rodrigo Rivas
21:24 Re: Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. 3dw4rd
19:55 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Rodrigo Rivas
17:27 Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Ian Lance Taylor
17:26 Re: Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Ian Lance Taylor
16:23 Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Ed Smith-Rowland
16:01 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Joseph S. Myers
15:09 Re: Calculation of RTX Costs Ian Lance Taylor
14:16 Re: How to dump SSA in lto Richard Guenther
14:15 Re: How to dump SSA in lto Hongtao
14:07 Re: How to dump SSA in lto Richard Guenther
13:31 How to dump SSA in lto Hongtao
13:17 Calculation of RTX Costs Paulo J. Matos
13:04 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Dave Korn
10:36 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
10:01 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Jonathan Wakely
05:50 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Manuel López-Ibáñez
01:51 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike

September 20, 2010
23:23 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Frédéric Buclin
23:18 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Jonathan Wakely
23:07 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
22:26 RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Hargett, Matt
22:01 GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready Frédéric Buclin
19:02 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:01 Re: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
18:22 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Jonathan Wakely
18:20 RE: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo
17:28 RE: Range-based for in c++98 Magnus Fromreide
16:39 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
16:22 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Rodrigo Rivas
13:58 [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums Rodrigo Rivas
08:39 RE: Range-based for in c++98 Rodrigo Rivas
08:24 Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new canadian mirror Sergey Ivanov

September 19, 2010
21:02 , you may not Deaguero Mostowy
20:42 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new canadian mirror Gerald Pfeifer
19:49 gcc-4.3-20100919 is now available gccadmin
19:06 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland
18:37 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Rodrigo Rivas
17:49 Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Paolo Carlini
10:21 Re: Reverse mapping from decl uid Richard Guenther
09:13 Re: bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? Ralf Wildenhues
09:11 Re: bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? Paolo Bonzini
09:06 bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? Ralf Wildenhues

September 18, 2010
22:56 gcc-4.6-20100918 is now available gccadmin
20:32 Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types Jonathan Wakely
19:26 Reverse mapping from decl uid Uday P. Khedker
14:50 Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types H.J. Lu
13:36 Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types H.J. Lu
13:33 Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types Jonathan Wakely
13:31 RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types Jonathan Wakely
04:39 Range-based for in c++98 Magnus Fromreide

September 17, 2010
06:25 [C++-0x] User-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland

September 16, 2010
22:50 gcc-4.5-20100916 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: About LTO merging symbol tables Diego Novillo
22:06 About LTO merging symbol tables Hongtao
21:40 Re: Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Ian Lance Taylor
17:13 Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 JonY
16:18 Re: Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic Paolo Carlini
15:26 Re: Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic Joseph S. Myers
14:18 Re: -Os is weak... Jakub Jelinek
13:19 new canadian mirror Sergey Ivanov
13:00 Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C ZoltÃn KÃcsi
12:10 Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic Paolo Carlini
12:03 Re: -Os is weak... Steven Bosscher
08:55 Re: -Os is weak... Andi Kleen
07:50 Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C J Decker
07:36 Re: -Os is weak... Yao Qi
06:38 Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C Sebastian Redl
06:15 array of pointer to function support in GNU C ir_idjit

September 15, 2010
22:44 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump
22:16 Re: Dejagnu testcase behavior unexpected David Weiser
22:12 Re: Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Ian Lance Taylor
21:25 Re: Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT David Daney
21:18 . Yet from time t Tilmon Cristino
21:15 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
21:04 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Robert Dewar
20:56 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
20:46 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ralf Wildenhues
20:44 Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT Ian Lance Taylor
15:58 Re: question about lshiftrt:DI when there are no 64bits in the processor fanqifei
15:20 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
14:19 [C++0x] Working on user-defined literals. Ed Smith-Rowland
14:09 Re: PHI nodes undefined Richard Guenther
13:27 Re: question about lshiftrt:DI when there are no 64bits in the processor Georg Lay
13:25 Re: PHI nodes undefined Paulo J. Matos
13:23 Re: question about lshiftrt:DI when there are no 64bits in the processor Ian Lance Taylor
13:20 PHI nodes undefined Paulo J. Matos
13:17 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Paulo J. Matos
13:01 RE: Question about alias check in ddg.c Bingfeng Mei
12:55 question about lshiftrt:DI when there are no 64bits in the processor fanqifei
12:39 RE: Question about alias check in ddg.c Bingfeng Mei
12:28 Question about alias check in ddg.c Revital1 Eres
09:36 Re: Support for range-based "for" in g++? Paolo Carlini
09:32 Support for range-based "for" in g++? gcc
08:34 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Richard Guenther
07:25 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Nicolas BENOIT
07:23 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Kevin AndrÃ
06:55 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Arnaud Charlet
03:27 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Laurynas Biveinis
03:26 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Marcus G. Daniels
00:19 Re: Dejagnu testcase behavior unexpected Ian Lance Taylor
00:02 Dejagnu testcase behavior unexpected David Weiser

September 14, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.4-20100914 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Joseph S. Myers
21:28 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise tbp
21:15 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Diego Novillo
20:59 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Diego Novillo
20:47 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Basile Starynkevitch
20:41 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Diego Novillo
19:50 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Ian Lance Taylor
19:47 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise Ian Lance Taylor
19:38 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Dave Korn
19:21 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Basile Starynkevitch
19:17 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise tbp
19:10 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Godmar Back
18:56 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Uday P. Khedker
18:51 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Andrew Pinski
18:47 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Uday P. Khedker
18:44 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise Ian Lance Taylor
18:35 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Axel Freyn
18:35 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Ian Lance Taylor
18:28 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise tbp
18:25 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Daniel Jacobowitz
18:24 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Uday P. Khedker
17:38 rationale for eliding modifications to string constants Godmar Back
17:22 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Marcus Daniels
17:14 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise Ian Lance Taylor
17:00 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Basile Starynkevitch
16:59 Re: [PATCH] Add missing variable_size GTY annotations (was Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?) Dennis, CHENG Renquan
16:57 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Basile Starynkevitch
16:42 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Jan Hubicka
16:20 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Paulo J. Matos
16:17 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Steven Bosscher
16:16 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Paulo J. Matos
16:01 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Sebastian Pop
16:00 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Guenther
15:56 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
15:52 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Paulo J. Matos
15:51 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise tbp
15:48 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Richard Guenther
15:39 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Marcus Daniels
15:37 Re: Updating frequencies and dominators Sebastian Pop
15:28 Re: g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved tbp
15:19 Updating frequencies and dominators Paulo J. Matos
14:59 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise Daniel Jacobowitz
14:59 Re: -Wdouble-promotion & noise Ian Lance Taylor
14:52 Re: g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved Ian Lance Taylor
14:46 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Basile Starynkevitch
14:35 Re: intmax_t vs (extended) integer types Paolo Carlini
14:30 -Wdouble-promotion & noise tbp
14:29 Re: intmax_t vs (extended) integer types Joseph S. Myers
14:23 intmax_t vs (extended) integer types Paolo Carlini
14:23 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes David Edelsohn
14:14 Re: g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved tbp
14:14 plugin hooks for plugin-provided macros? Basile Starynkevitch
14:14 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Steven Bosscher
14:12 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Diego Novillo
14:01 Re: plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Richard Guenther
13:37 plugin hooks for plugin-provided builtins? Basile Starynkevitch
13:18 [PATCH] Add missing variable_size GTY annotations (was Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?) Laurynas Biveinis
12:40 Build failure on x86_64 following patch to add ix86_units_per_simd_word Dr Andrew John Hughes
12:05 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Kai Ruottu
11:14 Re: Dealing with basic blocks Paulo J. Matos
10:13 Re: Dealing with basic blocks Richard Guenther
10:09 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Guenther
09:08 Dealing with basic blocks Paulo J. Matos
08:30 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Dennis, CHENG Renquan

September 13, 2010
22:43 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Steven Bosscher
22:33 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ian Lance Taylor
22:30 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:27 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ian Lance Taylor
22:16 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Steven Bosscher
22:06 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:48 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Steven Bosscher
21:42 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ian Lance Taylor
21:37 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:31 Re: Is this wrong optimization in cse1 pass? Steven Bosscher
20:20 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Marcus Daniels
20:15 Re: Is this wrong optimization in cse1 pass? Ian Lance Taylor
20:04 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ian Lance Taylor
15:55 Is this wrong optimization in cse1 pass? Bingfeng Mei
15:22 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:55 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Jack Howarth
14:19 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Dennis, CHENG Renquan
13:33 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Laurynas Biveinis
13:28 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Dennis, CHENG Renquan
13:08 Re: How to parse a code snippet at front-end plugin Thinker K.F. Li
12:16 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Laurynas Biveinis
12:11 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Kai Ruottu
11:45 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:30 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Paolo Bonzini
07:40 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Dennis, CHENG Renquan

September 12, 2010
23:37 RE: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Jay K
19:48 gcc-4.3-20100912 is now available gccadmin
18:30 RE: RFH: optabs code in the java front end Boehm, Hans
17:56 new mirror Slevin Black
17:08 Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end Andrew Haley
16:59 Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end Andrew Haley
15:00 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Frank Ch. Eigler
08:59 GCC plugins [those not listed in the wiki] Basile Starynkevitch
08:47 Re: GNAT building fails on MinGW wiith gcc-4.6.020100904 weekly snapshot Florian Weimer
08:39 Re: GNAT building fails on MinGW wiith gcc-4.6.020100904 weekly snapshot Florian Weimer
06:35 Re: How to parse a code snippet at front-end plugin Basile Starynkevitch
06:16 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ralf Wildenhues
03:35 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Dave Korn
02:50 Re: question on points-to analysis Amker.Cheng
02:07 Re: question on points-to analysis Daniel Berlin
00:21 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Jack Howarth

September 11, 2010
23:48 How to parse a code snippet at front-end plugin Thinker K.F. Li
22:55 gcc-4.6-20100911 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
21:14 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ralf Wildenhues
20:59 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
20:53 Get of them. Jefferies had heard O'Conner Still
20:43 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Ralf Wildenhues
20:21 Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end Joseph S. Myers
19:28 Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end Steven Bosscher
18:48 Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end Andrew Haley
18:41 Re: 'Range-based for' support for gcc Paolo Carlini
18:09 'Range-based for' support for gcc Flex Ferrum
11:15 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
10:06 RE: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Jay K
08:48 RE: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Jay K
07:54 Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration Ralf Wildenhues
07:29 Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration Angelo Graziosi
04:17 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump
02:49 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
02:38 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump

September 10, 2010
23:43 Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration Steve Kargl
23:11 Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end David Daney
23:05 Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration Angelo Graziosi
22:50 RFH: optabs code in the java front end Steven Bosscher
20:39 RE: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Jay K
20:24 RE: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Jay K
18:49 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
18:45 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
18:04 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
17:47 Re: g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved tbp
17:31 Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration Steve Kargl
17:08 Re: [RFC] Full float128, third iteration FX
16:58 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump
16:54 [CFP] GCC Research Opportunities Workshop 2011 David Edelsohn
16:54 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump
16:49 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump
16:17 Re: -Os is weak... DJ Delorie
15:57 Re: Rebuilding the cfg Ian Lance Taylor
15:56 Re: Rebuilding the cfg Ian Lance Taylor
15:54 Re: Rebuilding the cfg Andrew Pinski
15:53 Re: Rebuilding the cfg Richard Guenther
15:51 Re: Rebuilding the cfg Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 Re: g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:41 Re: Rebuilding the cfg Richard Guenther
15:40 Rebuilding the cfg Paulo J. Matos
15:20 Re: g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved Ian Lance Taylor
15:18 Re: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Robert Dewar
15:08 Re: internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Ian Lance Taylor
14:23 Re: Frontend pass assumptions Paulo J. Matos
14:16 Re: Frontend pass assumptions Richard Guenther
14:07 Re: Frontend pass assumptions Paulo J. Matos
13:49 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:48 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Steven Bosscher
13:47 Re: Frontend pass assumptions Paulo J. Matos
13:37 Re: Frontend pass assumptions Richard Guenther
13:35 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Paulo J. Matos
13:25 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Jack Howarth
13:16 Frontend pass assumptions Paulo J. Matos
13:13 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:12 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:09 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:00 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Steven Bosscher
12:38 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
12:28 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Guenther
12:21 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:20 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
12:16 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:11 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
12:10 g++, trunk, recent weird mismatch for arguments with forwarded declaration when attributes are involved tbp
11:50 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
11:47 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Joseph S. Myers
11:11 internal compiler error: in referenced_var_lookup, at tree-dfa.c Jay K
10:56 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Nicola Pero
10:31 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 in progress Frédéric Buclin
10:28 Re: when will gcc 4.4.5 be? Jakub Jelinek
10:22 Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 in progress Richard Guenther
10:12 GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 in progress Frédéric Buclin
09:42 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Guenther
09:38 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Steven Bosscher
09:13 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Guenther
08:44 Re: -Os is weak... Steven Bosscher
07:46 64 bit porting guide manju k
04:50 when will gcc 4.4.5 be? Kenny Simpson
01:33 GNAT building fails on MinGW wiith gcc-4.6.020100904 weekly snapshot koala01
00:18 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Joe Buck

September 09, 2010
23:13 RE: How to avoid auto-vectorization for this loop (rolls at most 3 times) Fang, Changpeng
22:54 gcc-4.5-20100909 is now available gccadmin
21:13 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
21:12 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
21:09 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
20:00 Re: -Os is weak... Steven Bosscher
19:42 Re: -Os is weak... Steven Bosscher
19:30 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Dave Korn
19:19 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Jack Howarth
19:05 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Dave Korn
18:55 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Nicola Pero
17:39 Re: Cross-platform build problem Ralf Wildenhues
17:38 Re: -Os is weak... DJ Delorie
17:20 Re: -Os is weak... Andrew Pinski
17:16 Re: -Os is weak... Ian Lance Taylor
17:09 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Chris Lattner
16:47 Re: g++ segfault when using C++0x featureâ Jonathan Wakely
16:43 -Os is weak... DJ Delorie
15:39 Bootstrap failure on x86 and sparc Solaris Art Haas
11:36 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Richard Kenner
11:24 Re: question on points-to analysis Richard Guenther
11:20 question on points-to analysis Amker.Cheng
11:02 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Mike Stump
10:32 Re: Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Nicola Pero
10:24 Cross-platform build problem Piotr Wyderski
10:15 Arun Khanna would like to add you as a friend Arun Khanna
10:11 Merging Apple's Objective-C 2.0 compiler changes Nicola Pero
09:53 Re: Built-ins for C99 macros isfinite, isnan, isnormal, isinf, signbit FX
09:51 Re: Built-ins for C99 macros isfinite, isnan, isnormal, isinf, signbit Paolo Carlini
09:44 Built-ins for C99 macros isfinite, isnan, isnormal, isinf, signbit FX
09:23 Re: Question on TER Steven Bosscher
09:11 Re: Switch case ordering Paulo J. Matos
08:46 Re: Question on TER Richard Guenther
02:26 Re: gcc Tom Browder
02:13 Question on TER Pat Haugen

September 08, 2010
21:30 Re: Switch case ordering Richard Henderson
21:26 Re: Switch case ordering Paulo J. Matos
20:55 How to avoid auto-vectorization for this loop (rolls at most 3 times) Fang, Changpeng
14:47 Re: Switch case ordering Richard Henderson
14:15 Switch case ordering Paulo J. Matos
12:28 RE: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining Bingfeng Mei
10:43 RE: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining Bingfeng Mei
10:26 Re: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining Richard Guenther
10:07 Function-specific optimization flags and inlining Bingfeng Mei
09:49 Help setting up open-source project for charity dev1
00:23 Re: How to write a SPEC function that gets all arguments passed? Ian Lance Taylor

September 07, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.4-20100907 is now available gccadmin
21:50 Re: g++ segfault when using C++0x featureâ James Dennett
19:33 g++ segfau lt when us ing C++0x feature‏ Nathan Ridge
17:34 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade NightStrike
17:17 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade Frédéric Buclin
17:14 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade NightStrike
17:12 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade Frédéric Buclin
17:08 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade NightStrike
16:49 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade Frédéric Buclin
16:41 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade NightStrike
13:36 Re: GCC label numbering Joel
13:21 Re: Fwd: GCC label numbering Andrew Haley
13:13 Fwd: GCC label numbering Joel
11:25 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade Tom Browder
09:52 Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade Gerald Pfeifer
08:47 Re: who can & want to review gengtype patches? Paolo Bonzini
08:42 who can & want to review gengtype patches? Basile Starynkevitch
08:34 Re: GCC on FreeBSD/ia64: No rule to make target .../libgcc/crtfastmath.o Anton Shterenlikht
02:00 Re: GCC on FreeBSD/ia64: No rule to make target .../libgcc/crtfastmath.o H.J. Lu

September 06, 2010
23:30 GCC on FreeBSD/ia64: No rule to make target .../libgcc/crtfastmath.o Gerald Pfeifer
19:47 gcc bugzilla upgrade Tom Browder
18:11 Re: permissions to resolve bugs Nicola Pero
18:06 Re: permissions to resolve bugs Andrew Pinski
17:32 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
17:24 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Andrew Haley
17:18 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
16:50 permissions to resolve bugs Nicola Pero
16:33 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Tim Prince
16:21 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Richard Guenther
16:19 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
14:52 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Kai Ruottu
14:13 gcc xie pan
13:50 Re: Question about Doloop Zdenek Dvorak
11:44 Re: structures & param_structures in gengtype Laurynas Biveinis
10:32 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Justin Mattock
09:54 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Cheng Rk
09:22 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Richard Guenther
09:18 Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Justin P. Mattock
08:30 Re: How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch? Adam Jiang
05:17 Re: structures & param_structures in gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
03:37 Re: structures & param_structures in gengtype Laurynas Biveinis
03:17 on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly? Dennis

September 05, 2010
22:18 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Tobias Burnus
22:10 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Gerald Pfeifer
19:47 gcc-4.3-20100905 is now available gccadmin
18:40 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Mark Mitchell
18:35 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
18:29 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Mark Mitchell
18:23 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike
18:03 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Mark Mitchell
15:48 DFP regression on FreeBSD Gerald Pfeifer
11:46 Question about Doloop Revital1 Eres
04:23 Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 NightStrike

September 04, 2010
22:57 gcc-4.6-20100904 is now available gccadmin
18:41 Re: please revert r163815/r163816 Jack Howarth
18:41 Re: C++-0x range for loop Paolo Carlini
18:31 C++-0x range for loop Ed Smith-Rowland
16:50 Re: Broken links on main gcc website. Gerald Pfeifer
15:22 Re: please revert r163815/r163816 H.J. Lu
09:10 Re: please revert r163815/r163816 Paolo Bonzini
03:54 please revert r163815/r163816 Jack Howarth

September 03, 2010
16:40 Re: darwin weirdness Joseph S. Myers
15:55 darwin weirdness Jack Howarth
13:03 Re: Internal compiler error, gimplify.c:505. File a report? Diego Novillo
13:00 Internal compiler error, gimplify.c:505. File a report? Anders Furuhed
10:29 RE: Clustering switch cases Rahul Kharche
08:10 Re: How to get attribute of callee Georg Lay
02:56 Re: How to get attribute of callee Phung Nguyen

September 02, 2010
23:00 gcc-4.5-20100902 is now available gccadmin
18:07 structures & param_structures in gengtype Basile Starynkevitch
15:15 Re: How to get attribute of callee Phung Nguyen
14:15 How to write a SPEC function that gets all arguments passed? Georg Lay
12:59 Re: How to get attribute of callee Jakub Jelinek
12:49 Re: How to get attribute of callee Georg Lay
12:18 How to get attribute of callee Phung Nguyen

September 01, 2010
22:58 Re: Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon Ian Lance Taylor
21:43 Re: Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon Eric Botcazou
20:12 Re: Error message formatting feature request [C++] Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:46 Re: Error message formatting feature request Ian Lance Taylor
19:42 Error message formatting feature request Jeremiah Willcock
18:14 Re: Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon konrad
16:04 Re: Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon Eric Botcazou
13:20 Re: Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon Ian Lance Taylor
12:37 Re: Clustering switch cases Paulo J. Matos
09:33 Re: Clustering switch cases Richard Guenther
09:15 Re: Clustering switch cases Paulo J. Matos
08:46 Adding official support into the main tree for SPARC Leon Luís Vitório Cargnini
08:39 Re: Clustering switch cases Richard Guenther
02:15 Recall: Atom 2010-Q3 SPEC CPU 2K results Lu, Hongjiu
02:14 Atom 2010-Q3 SPEC CPU 2K results Lu, Hongjiu


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3