This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
September 30, 2010
| 23:00 | gcc-4.5-20100930 is now available | gccadmin |
| 17:12 | Re: secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers | Georg Lay |
| 12:37 | GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2010-09-30) | Richard Guenther |
| 10:57 | Re: Report: using GCC plugin to implement ORM for C++ | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 10:35 | Report: using GCC plugin to implement ORM for C++ | Boris Kolpackov |
| 09:39 | Re: old aliasing bug: fixed? | Richard Guenther |
| 09:05 | secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers | Alex Turjan |
| 07:54 | old aliasing bug: fixed? | Albert Cahalan |
| 00:24 | Re: Handling NaNs in FP comparisons | Richard Henderson |
September 29, 2010
| 23:31 | Handling NaNs in FP comparisons | Michael Eager |
| 23:02 | Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | Jonathan Wakely |
| 22:53 | check_cxa_atexit_available | Richard Henderson |
| 21:47 | Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches | Nicola Pero |
| 17:40 | Re: Worse code generated by PRE | Xinliang David Li |
| 12:57 | RE: Worse code generated by PRE | Bingfeng Mei |
| 12:33 | Re: Worse code generated by PRE | Richard Guenther |
| 12:16 | Worse code generated by PRE | Bingfeng Mei |
| 11:10 | Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 10:49 | Re: Bugzilla not whining [was Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT] | Dave Korn |
| 08:29 | Re: Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | Andrew Haley |
| 07:07 | Regarding code portability across different gcc/g++ versions | #SINHA SHARAD# |
September 28, 2010
September 27, 2010
September 26, 2010
| 19:53 | gcc-4.3-20100926 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:52 | Re: Polyhedron Fortran benchmark - compiler comparison: Good results for GCC 4.6 | Steve Kargl |
| 14:47 | Polyhedron Fortran benchmark - compiler comparison: Good results for GCC 4.6 | Tobias Burnus |
| 14:37 | Re: Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends | Joseph S. Myers |
| 14:31 | Re: Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends | Steven Bosscher |
| 14:21 | Handle macros like TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS for non C-family frontends | FX |
| 12:19 | Re: -Os is weak... | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 04:32 | Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Jason Merrill |
| 02:02 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Ian Lance Taylor |
September 25, 2010
| 22:54 | gcc-4.6-20100925 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:56 | Re: About DECL_UID | Diego Novillo |
| 20:52 | Re: About DECL_UID | Hongtao |
| 20:48 | Re: About DECL_UID | Diego Novillo |
| 20:40 | About DECL_UID | Hongtao |
| 19:34 | [Ada] SCIL file generation in the trunk | Florian Weimer |
| 15:30 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:20 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Frédéric Buclin |
| 15:10 | Re: Bugzilla outage Thursday, September 23, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:03 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 14:43 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 14:28 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Steve Kargl |
| 13:20 | gcj fails to compile java | Jack Howarth |
| 08:46 | Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Jakub Jelinek |
| 05:45 | Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? | Steve Kargl |
September 24, 2010
| 22:46 | Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI | Luke A. Guest |
| 22:40 | Re: Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI | Andrew Pinski |
| 22:37 | Porting ZCX (not SJLJ) for GNAT ARM EABI | Luke A. Guest |
| 20:23 | GCC 4.4.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Jakub Jelinek |
| 14:23 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 10:00 | Re: Choosing the best multiplication | Paulo J. Matos |
| 09:57 | Re: Choosing the best multiplication | Paulo J. Matos |
| 09:33 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Paolo Bonzini |
| 09:30 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Basile Starynkevitch |
| 08:51 | Re: gengtype indentation issues | Paolo Bonzini |
| 08:48 | Re: Choosing the best multiplication | Paolo Bonzini |
| 08:11 | Choosing the best multiplication | Paulo J. Matos |
| 07:56 | Re: Calculation of RTX Costs | Paulo J. Matos |
September 23, 2010
September 22, 2010
| 23:44 | Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 22:06 | [PATCH] for Re: new mirror | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 20:18 | RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Hargett, Matt |
| 19:35 | Re: Where are the new GCC releases? | Jakub Jelinek |
| 19:15 | Re: Where are the new GCC releases? | Joe Buck |
| 19:02 | Re: Where are the new GCC releases? | Richard Guenther |
| 17:50 | Where are the new GCC releases? | Artem S. Tashkinov |
| 08:12 | Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 02:41 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
| 02:39 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
September 21, 2010
September 20, 2010
| 23:23 | Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready | Frédéric Buclin |
| 23:18 | Re: GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready | Jonathan Wakely |
| 23:07 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 22:26 | RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Hargett, Matt |
| 22:01 | GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready | Frédéric Buclin |
| 19:02 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 19:01 | Re: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 18:22 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 18:20 | RE: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo |
| 17:28 | RE: Range-based for in c++98 | Magnus Fromreide |
| 16:39 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
| 16:22 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 13:58 | [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 08:39 | RE: Range-based for in c++98 | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 08:24 | Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new canadian mirror | Sergey Ivanov |
September 19, 2010
| 21:02 | , you may not | Deaguero Mostowy |
| 20:42 | [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new canadian mirror | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 19:49 | gcc-4.3-20100919 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:06 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
| 18:37 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Rodrigo Rivas |
| 17:49 | Re: [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Paolo Carlini |
| 10:21 | Re: Reverse mapping from decl uid | Richard Guenther |
| 09:13 | Re: bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? | Ralf Wildenhues |
| 09:11 | Re: bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? | Paolo Bonzini |
| 09:06 | bump Autoconf and Libtool versions? | Ralf Wildenhues |
September 18, 2010
| 22:56 | gcc-4.6-20100918 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:32 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | Jonathan Wakely |
| 19:26 | Reverse mapping from decl uid | Uday P. Khedker |
| 14:50 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | H.J. Lu |
| 13:36 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | H.J. Lu |
| 13:33 | Re: RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:31 | RFH: PR 44645 - missing debug info for C++ pointer types | Jonathan Wakely |
| 04:39 | Range-based for in c++98 | Magnus Fromreide |
September 17, 2010
| 06:25 | [C++-0x] User-defined literals. | Ed Smith-Rowland |
September 16, 2010
| 22:50 | gcc-4.5-20100916 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:15 | Re: About LTO merging symbol tables | Diego Novillo |
| 22:06 | About LTO merging symbol tables | Hongtao |
| 21:40 | Re: Bugzilla outage Friday, September 17, 18:00GMT-21:00GMT | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:13 | Re: ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708 | JonY |
| 16:18 | Re: Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic | Paolo Carlini |
| 15:26 | Re: Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic | Joseph S. Myers |
| 14:18 | Re: -Os is weak... | Jakub Jelinek |
| 13:19 | new canadian mirror | Sergey Ivanov |
| 13:00 | Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C | ZoltÃn KÃcsi |
| 12:10 | Mixed mode __complex__ arithmetic | Paolo Carlini |
| 12:03 | Re: -Os is weak... | Steven Bosscher |
| 08:55 | Re: -Os is weak... | Andi Kleen |
| 07:50 | Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C | J Decker |
| 07:36 | Re: -Os is weak... | Yao Qi |
| 06:38 | Re: array of pointer to function support in GNU C | Sebastian Redl |
| 06:15 | array of pointer to function support in GNU C | ir_idjit |
September 15, 2010
September 14, 2010
September 13, 2010
September 12, 2010
September 11, 2010
September 10, 2010
September 09, 2010
September 08, 2010
| 21:30 | Re: Switch case ordering | Richard Henderson |
| 21:26 | Re: Switch case ordering | Paulo J. Matos |
| 20:55 | How to avoid auto-vectorization for this loop (rolls at most 3 times) | Fang, Changpeng |
| 14:47 | Re: Switch case ordering | Richard Henderson |
| 14:15 | Switch case ordering | Paulo J. Matos |
| 12:28 | RE: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Bingfeng Mei |
| 10:43 | RE: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Bingfeng Mei |
| 10:26 | Re: Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Richard Guenther |
| 10:07 | Function-specific optimization flags and inlining | Bingfeng Mei |
| 09:49 | Help setting up open-source project for charity | dev1 |
| 00:23 | Re: How to write a SPEC function that gets all arguments passed? | Ian Lance Taylor |
September 07, 2010
September 06, 2010
September 05, 2010
| 22:18 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Tobias Burnus |
| 22:10 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 19:47 | gcc-4.3-20100905 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:40 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Mark Mitchell |
| 18:35 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
| 18:29 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Mark Mitchell |
| 18:23 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
| 18:03 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | Mark Mitchell |
| 15:48 | DFP regression on FreeBSD | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 11:46 | Question about Doloop | Revital1 Eres |
| 04:23 | Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 | NightStrike |
September 04, 2010
| 22:57 | gcc-4.6-20100904 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:41 | Re: please revert r163815/r163816 | Jack Howarth |
| 18:41 | Re: C++-0x range for loop | Paolo Carlini |
| 18:31 | C++-0x range for loop | Ed Smith-Rowland |
| 16:50 | Re: Broken links on main gcc website. | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 15:22 | Re: please revert r163815/r163816 | H.J. Lu |
| 09:10 | Re: please revert r163815/r163816 | Paolo Bonzini |
| 03:54 | please revert r163815/r163816 | Jack Howarth |
September 03, 2010
| 16:40 | Re: darwin weirdness | Joseph S. Myers |
| 15:55 | darwin weirdness | Jack Howarth |
| 13:03 | Re: Internal compiler error, gimplify.c:505. File a report? | Diego Novillo |
| 13:00 | Internal compiler error, gimplify.c:505. File a report? | Anders Furuhed |
| 10:29 | RE: Clustering switch cases | Rahul Kharche |
| 08:10 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Georg Lay |
| 02:56 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Phung Nguyen |
September 02, 2010
| 23:00 | gcc-4.5-20100902 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:07 | structures & param_structures in gengtype | Basile Starynkevitch |
| 15:15 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Phung Nguyen |
| 14:15 | How to write a SPEC function that gets all arguments passed? | Georg Lay |
| 12:59 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Jakub Jelinek |
| 12:49 | Re: How to get attribute of callee | Georg Lay |
| 12:18 | How to get attribute of callee | Phung Nguyen |
September 01, 2010
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]