This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis

From: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, Claudiu Zissulescu <claziss at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:02:44 -0400
Subject: Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis
References: <AANLkTimdtq69xp=83QZLS+bMjsbccKxnbQgdB+JTGFmi@mail.gmail.com> <20100818190659.GA6806@hungry-tiger.westford.ibm.com> <4C6C3AFF.4020605@redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:56:47PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 12:06 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Now, unfortunately, I've been away from the code for about 2 years, and I don't
> > know whether it has bit-rotted or not.
> 
> It hasn't.  In fact, the Vectorize _cpp_clean_line thread
> contains a patch that uses it.  Not quite ready to commit,
> but nearly.

Cool.  I've been hoping to get the decks cleared, and add the power support as
well.  It would be nice to do the later stages that I had thought about for fat
binaries.

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
5 Technology Place Drive, M/S 2757, Westford, MA 01886-3141, USA
meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis
  - From: Claudiu Zissulescu
- Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis
  - From: Michael Meissner
- Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]