gcc archive
date index for August, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2010
23:34 Re: Clustering switch cases Paul Brook
22:55 gcc-4.4-20100831 is now available gccadmin
16:13 Re: How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch? David Daney
15:59 End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 Mark Mitchell
14:57 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Mark Mitchell
10:00 RE: Clustering switch cases Rahul Kharche
09:33 Re: C99 and C++0x status pages Piotr Wyderski
08:19 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Andrew Haley
07:10 C99 and C++0x status pages Andre Majorel
05:48 GCC summit tutorial proposal: Easily coding a GCC extension with MELT Basile Starynkevitch
04:32 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
03:37 Re: How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch? Adam Jiang

August 30, 2010
22:29 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
19:54 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Joseph S. Myers
19:51 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Uros Bizjak
19:38 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Jakub Jelinek
19:37 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Richard Henderson
19:25 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Uros Bizjak
18:27 Re: 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Kai Tietz
17:53 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Uros Bizjak
17:48 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Richard Henderson
17:43 Re: How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch? David Daney
17:40 Re: 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit NightStrike
17:37 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Uros Bizjak
17:34 Re: 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Toon Moene
17:25 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
16:48 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Joseph S. Myers
16:46 Re: How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch? Richard Henderson
16:42 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Gerald Pfeifer
14:50 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Vincent Lefevre
12:47 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Michael Matz
12:32 Re: GCC 4.5.1 Released Linju Baby John
10:46 How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch? Adam Jiang
08:06 built-in atomic functions manju k
07:42 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Gerald Pfeifer
06:43 Re: gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check Jonathan Wakely
06:29 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Uros Bizjak
01:59 gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check Tom Browder
01:55 Re: 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit NightStrike

August 29, 2010
23:47 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
20:48 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Uros Bizjak
19:49 gcc-4.3-20100829 is now available gccadmin
17:50 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
16:58 Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction Uday P. Khedker
13:25 Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction Basile Starynkevitch
12:02 Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction J Decker
11:43 Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction Uday P. Khedker
07:03 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch FX
01:48 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
00:57 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl
00:47 Re: For testing: full __float128 patch Steve Kargl

August 28, 2010
23:25 For testing: full __float128 patch FX
22:50 gcc-4.6-20100828 is now available gccadmin
17:53 Re: Problems with upstream versions of gmp, mpfr, and mpc [Was: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2] Tom Browder
17:44 Re: Problems with upstream versions of gmp, mpfr, and mpc [Was: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2] NightStrike
17:43 Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction Jeff Saremi
17:05 Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction Basile Starynkevitch
16:45 Re: Problems with upstream versions of gmp, mpfr, and mpc [Was: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2] Eric Botcazou
12:39 Re: Optimization Switches Sharjeel Imam
12:34 Re: Optimization Switches Sharjeel Imam
12:04 Problems with upstream versions of gmp, mpfr, and mpc [Was: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2] Andrew Haley
11:08 Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Tobias Burnus
10:08 Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) FX
08:23 Re: Clustering switch cases Paulo J. Matos
01:06 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Xinliang David Li
00:21 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Andrew Pinski
00:12 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Xinliang David Li

August 27, 2010
21:56 Re: Clustering switch cases Xinliang David Li
18:45 Re: Errors when invoking refs_may_alias_p_1 Richard Guenther
18:37 Re: Errors when invoking refs_may_alias_p_1 Hongtao
18:29 Re: Errors when invoking refs_may_alias_p_1 Richard Guenther
18:25 Re: Errors when invoking refs_may_alias_p_1 Hongtao
18:16 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum Ian Lance Taylor
17:15 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum Basile Starynkevitch
16:35 Re: Errors when invoking refs_may_alias_p_1 Richard Guenther
16:29 specs and X-s and canadian X-s. IainS
15:44 RE: Tutorial Proposal for GCC Summit Paralkar Anmol-B07584
15:40 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Corey Kasten
15:27 Errors when invoking refs_may_alias_p_1 Hongtao
15:09 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Richard Guenther
15:03 Re: Clustering switch cases Richard Guenther
15:03 Re: Clustering switch cases Paulo J. Matos
15:02 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Corey Kasten
14:47 Re: Clustering switch cases Ian Lance Taylor
14:43 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum Ian Lance Taylor
14:25 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum Laurynas Biveinis
14:23 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum Arnaud Charlet
14:20 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum jeremie . salvucci
13:50 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC Nathan Froyd
13:49 Re: Better performance on older version of GCC H.J. Lu
13:44 Better performance on older version of GCC Corey Kasten
13:40 Clustering switch cases Paulo J. Matos
12:49 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum jeremie . salvucci
12:47 Re: Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum Laurynas Biveinis
12:42 Gengtype : strange code in output_type_enum jeremie . salvucci
08:00 Re: Research Region Based Memory Management for Imperative Languages Uday P. Khedker
04:10 Re: Research Region Based Memory Management for Imperative Languages Ian Lance Taylor
01:16 Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction Jeff Saremi
01:11 Re: Beginner: Declarations do not show up when iterating through Gimple stmts Jeff Saremi
01:09 Research Region Based Memory Management for Imperative Languages Matt Davis
00:37 Re: Optimization Switches Paul Brook

August 26, 2010
22:53 gcc-4.5-20100826 is now available gccadmin
18:12 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Basile Starynkevitch
17:42 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Ian Lance Taylor
17:38 Re: Optimization Switches Jonathan Wakely
17:37 Re: Optimization Switches Jonathan Wakely
16:25 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Basile Starynkevitch
11:56 Optimization Switches sharjeel
10:23 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Paolo Bonzini
10:16 GREAT DISCOUNT: ORIGINAL BRAND NEW APPLE i-PHONE/ i-PAD-PC‏ Comets-Tech UK
10:16 GREAT DISCOUNT: ORIGINAL BRAND NEW APPLE i-PHONE/ i-PAD-PC‏ Comets-Tech UK
09:49 Re: Beginner: Declarations do not show up when iterating through Gimple stmts Richard Guenther
06:37 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Laurynas Biveinis
01:19 Beginner: Declarations do not show up when iterating through Gimple stmts Jeff Saremi

August 25, 2010
20:25 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Basile Starynkevitch
19:41 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Laurynas Biveinis
17:19 Can anyone tell me how to mark an instruction as taking 2 instruction slots for the scheduler? Dave Hudson
17:10 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Basile Starynkevitch
13:51 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Ian Lance Taylor
12:51 Re: mov arguments are the same Paulo J. Matos
09:55 Re: Change macro SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED to target hook TARGET_SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED? Richard Guenther
07:45 4-15% speed-up in std::sort special case - is it worth the effort? Jaroslav Hajek
06:12 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Laurynas Biveinis
05:54 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Basile Starynkevitch
05:29 Change macro SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED to target hook TARGET_SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED? Mingjie Xing

August 24, 2010
22:51 gcc-4.4-20100824 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Bernd Schmidt
22:20 Re: Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Ian Lance Taylor
20:55 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html maybe should mention memory settings for OpenBSD Jay K
17:38 Improving gengtype (for plugin support notably) - how to get a rather big patch accepted? Basile Starynkevitch
14:13 Re: nobits for named section Ian Lance Taylor
14:10 Re: mov arguments are the same Ian Lance Taylor
13:36 nobits for named section Bingfeng Mei
08:50 mov arguments are the same Paulo J. Matos
08:46 Re: Matching Constraints and Predicate Paulo J. Matos
05:42 valentino giuranno zoelf

August 23, 2010
22:20 Re: Broken links on main gcc website. Gerald Pfeifer
20:55 Re: Broken links on main gcc website. Jonathan Wakely
20:24 Re: Need help in deciding the instruction set for a new target. Richard Henderson
19:00 Snapshot announcements (was: gcc-4.4-20080725 is now available) Gerald Pfeifer
18:50 Re: Need help in deciding the instruction set for a new target. Bernd Schmidt
18:32 Re: Need help in deciding the instruction set for a new target. Ian Lance Taylor
18:25 Re: Broken links on gnu website. Andrew Pinski
18:23 Broken links on main gcc website. Gareth Randall
18:06 Need help in deciding the instruction set for a new target. Mohamed Shafi
17:45 Re: symbol redefined errors Ian Lance Taylor
17:43 Re: Matching Constraints and Predicate Ian Lance Taylor
17:26 Re: get "stack smasshing" for code that uses pointers passed as references. Florian Weimer
17:12 Re: build: are there situations where 'ar' does not work? Richard Guenther
16:49 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Richard Guenther
14:44 symbol redefined errors Kartik.Vashishta
14:26 get "stack smasshing" for code that uses pointers passed as references. Wendell Nichols
13:52 Re: A question about MAX_EXPR Jakub Jelinek
13:33 Matching Constraints and Predicate Paulo J. Matos
11:46 A question about MAX_EXPR Revital1 Eres
10:43 Re: build: are there situations where 'ar' does not work? Andi Kleen
05:16 Re: build: are there situations where 'ar' does not work? Ian Lance Taylor
00:02 Дyрoчkа oдHа Beзge_mmjh info

August 22, 2010
19:55 gcc-4.3-20100822 is now available gccadmin
18:28 build: are there situations where 'ar' does not work? Ralf Wildenhues
17:02 [testsuite] How to conditionally skip a single dejagnu directive Mikael Morin
12:35 RE: CLEAR_INSN_CACHE Kilbane, Stephen
11:20 Re: Forward declarations and variable alignment weirdness Paul Brook

August 21, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.6-20100821 is now available gccadmin
18:50 Re: CLEAR_INSN_CACHE Ian Lance Taylor
16:21 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Mark Mitchell
16:07 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Florian Weimer
15:29 CLEAR_INSN_CACHE Kilbane, Stephen
15:23 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Andrew Pinski
15:21 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Andrew Haley
12:45 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? David Brown
11:46 RE: Add uninitialized attribute? Kreitzer, David L
10:50 Re: Forward declarations and variable alignment weirdness Piotr JaroszyÅski
09:43 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Florian Weimer
01:05 Re: Forward declarations and variable alignment weirdness Paul Brook

August 20, 2010
23:32 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Mark Mitchell
23:29 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Mark Mitchell
22:52 RE: Could we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to build ADDR_EXPR ? Fang, Changpeng
21:57 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? H.J. Lu
20:57 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Bernd Schmidt
20:51 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Ian Lance Taylor
20:36 Re: Forward declarations and variable alignment weirdness Piotr JaroszyÅski
19:52 Re: Add uninitialized attribute? Diego Novillo
19:42 Add uninitialized attribute? H.J. Lu
15:21 Forward declarations and variable alignment weirdness Piotr JaroszyÅski
09:12 RE: Could we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to build ADDR_EXPR ? Richard Guenther
07:16 RE: Could we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to build ADDR_EXPR ? Fang, Changpeng
02:33 Re: Could we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to build ADDR_EXPR ? Richard Kenner
00:11 Re: Could we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to build ADDR_EXPR ? Andrew Pinski

August 19, 2010
23:55 Could we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to build ADDR_EXPR ? Fang, Changpeng
23:28 Re: Irreducible loops in generated code Zdenek Dvorak
22:54 gcc-4.5-20100819 is now available gccadmin
14:03 Re: Tutorial Proposal for GCC Summit Diego Novillo

August 18, 2010
21:36 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Richard Henderson
20:03 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Michael Meissner
19:56 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Richard Henderson
19:07 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Michael Meissner
16:51 Tutorial Proposal for GCC Summit Uday Khedker
13:33 Re: MIPS: Get rid of branches to .subsections. Matt Fleming
13:11 Re: Irreducible loops in generated code Alain Ketterlin
13:06 ARM / linux float ABI discrepancy Christophe Lyon
10:37 Re: Irreducible loops in generated code Steven Bosscher
09:53 Irreducible loops in generated code Alain Ketterlin
09:11 Gengtype for plugins jeremie . salvucci
03:56 Ласкающая твои бёдра Ольга долбит между ног zurnadjy

August 17, 2010
22:50 gcc-4.4-20100817 is now available gccadmin
18:19 Re: x86 assembler syntax Basile Starynkevitch
18:13 Re: x86 assembler syntax David Edelsohn
16:06 Re: complex numbers in gcc Richard Henderson
15:58 hans-otto wei zoelf
13:38 Re: legal work before submitting patches to GCC? Ian Lance Taylor
13:38 Re: x86 assembler syntax Gerald Pfeifer
13:32 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Maxim Kuvyrkov
13:20 complex numbers in gcc roy rosen
11:33 legal work before submitting patches to GCC? Petar Jovanovic
11:06 Re: x86 assembler syntax Richard Kenner
10:41 A minor mistake in cse_main? Amker.Cheng
03:56 Re: x86 assembler syntax Ian Lance Taylor
03:19 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke
03:10 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
03:06 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joern Rennecke

August 16, 2010
21:05 Массажистка Рита Спешитк тебе в трусы ao
20:53 Yang Hailin zoelf
19:40 Ласкающая твои бёдра Мелисса этой ночью для тебя sobacin
15:25 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Jonathan Corbet
14:27 Re: Help for target with BITS_PER_UNIT = 16 Dave Korn
13:18 Re: Help for target with BITS_PER_UNIT = 16 Richard Guenther
13:17 Re: Help for target with BITS_PER_UNIT = 16 Michael Matz
12:10 Help for target with BITS_PER_UNIT = 16 Mohamed Shafi
08:56 [CFARM] New AMD donated Magny-Cours system with 24 1.5 GHz cores and 64 GB RAM Laurent GUERBY
05:46 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Miles Bader

August 15, 2010
21:56 Re: x86 assembler syntax James Dennett
21:44 Re: x86 assembler syntax Gerald Pfeifer
20:21 Re: gcc-4.3-20100815 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
19:47 gcc-4.3-20100815 is now available gccadmin
19:16 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Florian Weimer
17:24 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joel Sherrill
16:19 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Florian Weimer
16:17 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Robert Dewar
16:17 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
16:17 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Florian Weimer
16:16 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Florian Weimer
16:12 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Robert Dewar
16:11 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Robert Dewar
16:08 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
16:07 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Florian Weimer

August 14, 2010
22:46 gcc-4.6-20100814 is now available gccadmin
21:56 Re: gcc-4.4-20080725 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
21:26 gcc-4.6-20100814 is now available gccadmin
15:44 [wwwdocs PATCH] re: mirror site http://gcc-ca.internet.bs Gerald Pfeifer
14:04 Re: g++ Long compile times Jonathan Wakely
13:49 g++ Long compile times Brad Bell
04:45 Чумавая Мэри размышляето твоём Банане diadema_software
00:57 Re: building nss-3.12.7 with 4.6.0 20100731 Ian Lance Taylor

August 13, 2010
23:43 Re: food for optimizer developers Steve Kargl
22:43 building nss-3.12.7 with 4.6.0 20100731 Justin Mattock
22:09 Re: food for optimizer developers Tobias Burnus
19:40 Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors Jack Howarth
11:46 Re: gcc -Wp,-MD no longer working in svn build Arnaud Charlet
11:14 Re: gcc -Wp,-MD no longer working in svn build Joseph S. Myers
11:06 Re: gcc -Wp,-MD no longer working in svn build Arnaud Charlet
11:00 Re: gcc -Wp,-MD no longer working in svn build Joseph S. Myers
10:41 Re: food for optimizer developers N.M. Maclaren
08:14 gcc -Wp,-MD no longer working in svn build Anton Blanchard
04:16 Re: Usage of sizeof in testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/rv[1..8]p.C Ian Lance Taylor
04:14 Re: Remove "asssertions" support from libcpp Ian Lance Taylor
04:10 Re: x86 assembler syntax Rick C. Hodgin
04:09 Re: BUILT_IN_FRONTEND - how did this work? Ian Lance Taylor
03:53 Re: x86 assembler syntax Ian Lance Taylor
03:47 Re: gcc-4.4-20100803 is now available Ian Lance Taylor
00:16 Re: food for optimizer developers Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

August 12, 2010
22:55 gcc-4.5-20100812 is now available gccadmin
20:22 Re: 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Toon Moene
19:47 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Andrew J. Hutton
19:06 Re: food for optimizer developers Steve Kargl
18:47 Re: food for optimizer developers Toon Moene
18:08 Re: food for optimizer developers Steve Kargl
16:18 [txcorp.com #14666] Resolved: culler down Tech-X Internal IT Support via
09:47 RE: Link error Ian Bolton
08:14 Re: food for optimizer developers David Brown
07:51 Re: food for optimizer developers Steven Bosscher
06:47 Re: food for optimizer developers Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
01:46 Re: Fw: Debugging plugins with gdb Jeff Saremi

August 11, 2010
23:15 Re: Fw: Debugging plugins with gdb Daniel Jacobowitz
22:56 Re: Fw: Debugging plugins with gdb Andrew Pinski
22:53 Fw: Debugging plugins with gdb Jeff Saremi
22:29 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.11 is released H.J. Lu
22:00 Re: food for optimizer developers Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
21:04 Re: food for optimizer developers Vladimir Makarov
18:26 Re: food for optimizer developers Richard Henderson
17:59 Re: food for optimizer developers Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
15:59 Re: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c and small memory target Jie Zhang
15:47 Re: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c and small memory target Sebastian Pop
15:29 gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c and small memory target Jie Zhang
13:49 Patch PR c++/45200 Dodji Seketeli
09:03 Re: Regarding the GCC Binaries and Build status pages Richard Guenther
08:50 Re: Question about tree-switch-conversion.c Richard Guenther
07:32 Regarding the GCC Binaries and Build status pages Dennis Clarke
05:26 Re: food for optimizer developers Tim Prince
04:21 Re: food for optimizer developers Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
03:48 Re: food for optimizer developers Andrew Pinski
01:51 food for optimizer developers Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

August 10, 2010
23:39 Медсестра Ольга расцелует с ног до головы limb
22:58 gcc-4.4-20100810 is now available gccadmin
19:54 Re: Remove "asssertions" support from libcpp Tom Tromey
16:48 Question about tree-switch-conversion.c Ian Bolton
15:53 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 H.J. Lu
13:05 Usage of sizeof in testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/rv[1..8]p.C Uros Bizjak
05:57 Remove "asssertions" support from libcpp Steven Bosscher

August 09, 2010
23:49 Re: [Bulk] Re: x86 assembler syntax Jonathan Wakely
22:17 BUILT_IN_FRONTEND - how did this work? Steven Bosscher
21:04 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Richard Henderson
20:57 Re: define_peepholes in mn10300 Richard Henderson
18:00 Re: Semantics of PARALLEL that sets and uses CC0 Steven Bosscher
17:53 Re: Semantics of PARALLEL that sets and uses CC0 Paolo Bonzini
17:39 Re: Semantics of PARALLEL that sets and uses CC0 Ulrich Weigand
14:26 Semantics of PARALLEL that sets and uses CC0 Steven Bosscher
14:20 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Claudiu Zissulescu
13:59 Link error Phung Nguyen
13:28 define_peepholes in mn10300 Steven Bosscher
10:58 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Joseph S. Myers
08:07 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Roberto Bagnara
07:08 Re: [Bulk] Re: x86 assembler syntax Rick C. Hodgin
07:03 RE: GCC 4.5.1 Released (2) Hans Kester (Ellips B.V.)
06:42 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc John Regehr
06:37 Re: x86 assembler syntax Tim Prince
05:21 x86 assembler syntax Rick C. Hodgin

August 08, 2010
22:54 gcc-4.3-20100808 is now available gccadmin
17:07 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Andi Kleen
17:01 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Michael Witten
16:56 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Michael Witten
15:30 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Andi Kleen
15:17 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Bernd Schmidt
15:08 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Uros Bizjak
15:01 Re: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Michael Witten
14:56 Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit Linux/x86 Uros Bizjak
14:31 Re: GCC 4.5.1 Released Dennis Clarke
12:17 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Florian Weimer
12:13 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Paolo Bonzini
11:13 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Florian Weimer
09:57 re: mirror site http://gcc-ca.internet.bs Gerald Pfeifer
09:45 О спаме Игорь Викторович
09:29 Re: Can a front end pass information to the Value Range Propagation Pass ? Toon Moene
09:01 Re: Can a front end pass information to the Value Range Propagation Pass ? Richard Guenther
08:52 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Vincent Lefevre
08:46 GCC 4.5.1 Released Richard Guenther
04:22 Template information with GCC 4.5 Kien Nguyen Trung
02:08 гламурная Анастасия мечтает пощупать вас!!!!! vitaly
01:39 ykuomkoll. weidongzu8742

August 07, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.6-20100807 is now available gccadmin
22:10 ЃyJ-REIT.NETЃz•s“®ЋY”„”ѓЋ–—бЊџЌх—p‚М–і—їѓfЃ[ѓ^ѓxЃ[ѓX‚М‚І€Д“а J-REIT
18:44 Can a front end pass information to the Value Range Propagation Pass ? Toon Moene
11:38 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Florian Weimer
07:46 Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2993! Justin P. Mattock
06:45 Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2993! Ted Ts'o
05:48 kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2993! Justin Mattock

August 06, 2010
23:23 Re: GCC Binary Kevin Bowling
20:29 Re: GCC Binary Peter Bergner
19:27 GCC Binary Erick Garske
19:16 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Bruce Korb
18:43 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Richard Guenther
18:42 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Tom Tromey
18:31 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Bruce Korb
18:20 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? David Daney
17:51 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Bruce Korb
17:34 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Bruce Korb
17:24 Re: Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? David Daney
17:24 Re: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Ralf Wildenhues
17:19 Bizarre GCC problem - how do I debug it? Bruce Korb
15:32 Re: Canadian cross build fails on 64 bits build machine Joseph S. Myers
15:22 Re: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Jack Howarth
15:15 Re: Canadian cross build fails on 64 bits build machine Christophe Lyon
15:05 Re: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Richard Guenther
14:49 Re: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Jack Howarth
14:44 [plugin] compiling plugins with g++ and -pedantic gives getopt declaration error Luke Dalessandro
13:53 Re: Canadian cross build fails on 64 bits build machine Joseph S. Myers
13:01 Re: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Jack Howarth
12:57 Canadian cross build fails on 64 bits build machine Christophe LYON
12:47 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Toon Moene
05:39 Re: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Ralf Wildenhues
01:47 RE: transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Jack Howarth
00:31 transitioning cloog to ppl-0.11 Jack Howarth

August 05, 2010
22:50 gcc-4.5-20100805 is now available gccadmin
21:13 re: mirror site http://gcc-ca.internet.bs Mark Hahn
20:21 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Sebastian Pop
20:18 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Sebastian Pop
20:08 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Sebastian Pop
20:05 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Sebastian Pop
20:00 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. H.J. Lu
19:34 Re: Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Sebastian Pop
18:58 Segmentation fault for the following Fortran program at -O3 on x86-64. Toon Moene
18:26 Re: constraints and predicates Richard Sandiford
16:51 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Richard Henderson
15:44 Re: How to get attual method in GCC AST Tom Tromey
13:49 CALL_USED_REGISTERS per function basis Claudiu Zissulescu
11:26 Re: constraints and predicates Georg Lay
09:58 Re: Thread model: single and C programs Marcos Dione
09:41 Re: constraints and predicates roy rosen
08:33 Re: Thread model: simple and C Jonathan Wakely
06:48 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Roberto Bagnara
06:40 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Roberto Bagnara
05:00 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Justin P. Mattock
03:54 Re: Thread model: simple and C Marcos_David . Dione
03:09 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Dennis Clarke

August 04, 2010
23:08 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
22:29 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Jonathan Wakely
21:52 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joe Buck
21:12 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
21:05 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc John Regehr
20:52 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Guenther
20:42 Re: some integer undefined behaviors in gcc Eric Botcazou
20:25 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Alfred M. Szmidt
20:03 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Alfred M. Szmidt
19:06 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Brian Makin
19:02 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Jonathan Wakely
18:59 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Jack Howarth
18:56 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
18:48 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Alfred M. Szmidt
18:47 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joe Buck
18:45 Re: Thread model: simple and C Jonathan Wakely
18:37 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
17:35 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Alfred M. Szmidt
17:17 Re: gcc-4.4-20100803 is now available Mihai DonÈu
17:06 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Justin P. Mattock
16:46 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joe Buck
15:43 Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11 Roberto Bagnara
15:29 RE: Shouldn't alias_sets_conflict_p be replaced with rtx_refs_may_alias_p? Bingfeng Mei
15:27 Re: Shouldn't alias_sets_conflict_p be replaced with rtx_refs_may_alias_p? Richard Guenther
15:26 Re: Shouldn't alias_sets_conflict_p be replaced with rtx_refs_may_alias_p? Steven Bosscher
14:05 ira-assert keeps turning up Paulo J. Matos
13:10 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Diego Novillo
12:56 Thread model: simple and C Marcos Dione
12:30 Re: Shouldn't alias_sets_conflict_p be replaced with rtx_refs_may_alias_p? Richard Guenther
12:02 Shouldn't alias_sets_conflict_p be replaced with rtx_refs_may_alias_p? Bingfeng Mei
11:36 Re: SH optimized software floating point routines Kaz Kojima
10:03 RE: SH optimized software floating point routines Naveen H. S
08:38 Re: Restrict qualifier still not working? Richard Guenther
07:23 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Benjamin Kosnik
07:21 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Benjamin Kosnik
00:08 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Miles Bader

August 03, 2010
23:27 some integer undefined behaviors in gcc John Regehr
22:54 gcc-4.4-20100803 is now available gccadmin
21:45 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Steven Bosscher
19:58 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joseph S. Myers
18:49 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Robert Dewar
18:46 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Robert Dewar
18:36 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Robert Dewar
16:39 RE: Restrict qualifier still not working? Bingfeng Mei
16:22 Re: Restrict qualifier still not working? Richard Guenther
16:20 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Joe Buck
16:12 RE: Restrict qualifier still not working? Bingfeng Mei
12:04 constraints and predicates roy rosen
09:41 Re: Restrict qualifier still not working? Richard Guenther
09:38 RE: Restrict qualifier still not working? Alexander Monakov
09:33 Re: Restrict qualifier still not working? Richard Guenther
09:05 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paolo Bonzini
08:50 RE: Restrict qualifier still not working? Bingfeng Mei
04:34 How to get attual method in GCC AST Kien Nguyen Trung
02:08 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
00:57 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
00:51 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Paul Koning

August 02, 2010
23:45 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Mark Mitchell
23:34 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
23:23 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Steven Bosscher
23:21 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Diego Novillo
23:16 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Richard Kenner
23:13 Re: GFDL/GPL issues Diego Novillo
19:08 DW_AT_external bug 45153 - patch P J P
16:55 Re: xfail syntax Robin Getz
16:48 Re: Restrict qualifier still not working? Alexander Monakov
16:19 Restrict qualifier still not working? Bingfeng Mei
15:39 Re: porting gcc to new arch: unrecognizable insn Gabor Kerenyi
15:21 Re: porting gcc to new arch: unrecognizable insn Dave Korn
00:32 гламурная Изольда хочет потереть твои яички!!!!! vikat20

August 01, 2010
22:47 gcc-4.3-20100801 is now available gccadmin
21:37 Re: onlinedocs/libstdc++ appears stale Gerald Pfeifer
17:11 Re: Reload problems with only one base reg for "base + offset" addressing mode Denis Chertykov
15:27 porting gcc to new arch: unrecognizable insn Gabor Kerenyi
14:33 Re: Reload problems with only one base reg for "base + offset" addressing mode redriver jiang
13:53 Re: Reload problems with only one base reg for "base + offset" addressing mode Denis Chertykov

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3