This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:05:13 +0200
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <4C030228.8020201@codesourcery.com> <1275283728.21123.24.camel@glinka> <4C03DB74.7090704@codesourcery.com> <1275323168.22465.12.camel@glinka> <4C04C561.3070707@gnu.org> <mcr7hmin8pj.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <4C060BD3.6090206@gnu.org> <AANLkTimpIc_OBDKYm7ibUUB6bu0HqLMpkVYj5limBq8z@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/02/2010 03:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

In the guidelines, I would like to include:
    (2) if you define a class template used mostly with pointer type arguments,
         consider specializing for void* (or const void*) and define all other
         pointer specialization in terms of that.

I have no idea what you're saying. :-) What do you mean by "define all other pointer specialization in terms of that"? Wouldn't specializing on T* just work?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]