This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Basile Starynkevitch <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 11:54:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <4C030228.8020201@codesourcery.com> <1275283728.21123.24.camel@glinka> <AANLkTikga6wz9sN8GNCYgHGUt3OiEpiOTzAEzbU4eIbB@mail.gmail.com> <20100531084212.GC29098@hector.lesours> <AANLkTikXBqwcgzsqCUuPg1lMTuWSuBtEm0jqC3ml_GZm@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiluVMmv5KtaNMi6kF4PC7U8H6rnUi5gFjXb8_NK@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinbANwUv8Q_4nrfkGJp_ORkS-7U4ZsNEUBgAFZK@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilicV2wdwvhuMpK4X9Dd3dUQYSP0UqCr6fJTjQE@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:27, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well - if somebody does the work and _completely_ converts
> tree and its accessor functions and macros to use a class-based
> tree then more power to him. ÂWhat I do not like to see is
> partial conversions to C++.

OK, that's reasonable.

Diego.

References:
- Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]