This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:09, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And we definitely should not do so just because we can. ÂI see
>> little value in turning our tree upside-down just because we now
>> can use C++ and make everything a class rather than a union.
>
> If hiding the structure of the data types matters, then 'tree' should
> be re-done as a class, shouldn't it? Otherwise, how are you going to
> get rid of all the accessor macros and static inline functions that
> only half-hide the underlying structures?
I agree. Richard, why do you think turning tree into an appropriate
class hierarchy would not be useful?
Diego.