This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ada LTO failures (2x)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:08:54 +0200
Subject: Re: Ada LTO failures (2x)
References: <AANLkTik5R2qtrTvOTMae1lRw7Q36P7FRdv8O6rGRGsGa@mail.gmail.com> <201005261738.02936.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <AANLkTik-DT3jiK_hWbO_qBq0b1EyfzhZ73yBemnGxyyP@mail.gmail.com>

> You could "fix" this by walking all functions and check if only
> one real language personality routine remains and promote
> the generic C personality uses to that.  Of course you need then
> to be able to identify the C personality which you can't (well,
> you could by name).

Can't we simply record the first personality routine encountered when reading 
in the GIMPLE IL and assign it to all FDEs that don't have one?  That would 
at least solve the problem in the homogeneous case.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ada LTO failures (2x)
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Ada LTO failures (2x)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Ada LTO failures (2x)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Ada LTO failures (2x)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]