This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>, "gcc.gcc.gnu.org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:45:39 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64
References: <4BD9B2EB.9060207@redhat.com> <w2v522e93241004291117n7eb214ah55245e0209f3297e@mail.gmail.com> <4BD9D49E.1040200@redhat.com> <20100429212744.GH22195@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <i2p522e93241004291436r437f8547k485f4a90511561e7@mail.gmail.com>

> I noticed eon's peak options do not include FDO, is that intended?
I think it is just bug in page header, but I will double check.
Base and peak should match otherwise.

Honza

References:
- GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64
  - From: Xinliang David Li

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]