gcc archive
date index for April, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2010
20:13 Possible missing case for -Wcast-align Pedro Pedruzzi
19:07 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
18:54 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Massimo Nazaria
18:32 GCC 4.4.4 Status Report (2010-04-30) Jakub Jelinek
18:13 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
18:01 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
17:36 Re: Type-generic macros with C Ian Lance Taylor
17:09 Highly sought after Weightl0sS Rxmed! wau Tessa Cramer
16:01 Type-generic macros with C Jörg Leis
15:52 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Richard Earnshaw
15:29 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Richard Guenther
15:26 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Joseph S. Myers
15:14 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Joel Sherrill
15:05 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Joe Buck
14:55 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Diego Novillo
14:48 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Michael Matz
14:37 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Joseph S. Myers
14:32 RE: memcpy(p,p,len) Paul Koning
14:30 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Mark Mielke
14:25 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Jan-Benedict Glaw
14:19 Re: [Mpc-discuss] gcc dependency on unsigned mpc releases Andreas Enge
14:19 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Joakim Tjernlund
14:13 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Richard Guenther
14:10 Re: memcpy(p,p,len) Jan-Benedict Glaw
14:08 memcpy(p,p,len) Joakim Tjernlund
14:00 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Diego Novillo
13:55 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Joel Sherrill
13:48 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Massimo Nazaria
13:43 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Steven Bosscher
13:35 Re: Please update GNU GCC mirror list Gerald Pfeifer
13:35 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Massimo Nazaria
12:12 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Steven Bosscher
12:10 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Richard Guenther
11:42 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Massimo Nazaria
11:40 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Diego Novillo
11:36 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Aina Niemetz
08:42 Re: Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Richard Guenther
08:37 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
06:16 split lui_movf pattern on mips? Amker.Cheng
01:58 Re: GIMPLE Front End (GSOC 2010) Sandeep Soni
00:57 Parallelized loads and widening mults cont:ed (was: Re: GCC porting tutorials) Hans-Peter Nilsson

April 29, 2010
23:47 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
23:07 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Steven Bosscher
23:06 Re: ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Joseph S. Myers
23:03 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
22:51 gcc-4.5-20100429 is now available gccadmin
22:50 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Steven Bosscher
22:42 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
22:35 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jack Howarth
21:46 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
21:45 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
21:38 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Steven Bosscher
21:36 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
21:34 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
21:33 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
21:27 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
20:40 ARM Neon Tests Failing on non-Neon Target Joel Sherrill
20:19 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
19:42 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Vladimir Makarov
19:06 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
18:57 Re: going from SunOS 5/SparcWorks -> Linux/gcc PaweÅ Sikora
18:47 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Vladimir Makarov
18:35 Re: going from SunOS 5/SparcWorks -> Linux/gcc Steven Bosscher
18:26 going from SunOS 5/SparcWorks -> Linux/gcc Brian Hill
18:17 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Xinliang David Li
18:17 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Vladimir Makarov
17:32 Re: GIMPLE Front End (GSOC 2010) Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:28 Problem with SSA form usign cgraph_nodes and push_cfun Massimo Nazaria
17:25 GIMPLE Front End (GSOC 2010) Sandeep Soni
16:49 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Vladimir Makarov
16:42 Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Jan Hubicka
16:41 Re: LTO question Xinliang David Li
16:29 RE: LTO question Bingfeng Mei
16:24 GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64 Vladimir Makarov
16:16 Re: LTO question Xinliang David Li
16:09 gcc 4.5.0 with Graphite - building & testing Solar Designer
15:24 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Jan Hubicka
15:23 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Richard Guenther
15:11 GCC viewcvs issue Jie Zhang
14:27 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Rainer Orth
14:08 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Ian Lance Taylor
13:17 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Jan Hubicka
13:03 Re: pattern "s<code>_<mode>" not used when generating rtl for float comparison on mips? Amker.Cheng
09:21 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Richard Guenther
09:19 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Steven Bosscher
09:13 Re: LTO question Jan Hubicka
08:57 Re: LTO vs static library archives [was Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549] Richard Guenther
08:50 Re: LTO question Richard Guenther
07:07 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Paolo Bonzini
06:56 Re: GCC porting tutorials Jonas Paulsson

April 28, 2010
22:22 Re: LTO question Jan Hubicka
22:19 Re: LTO question Jan Hubicka
21:45 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Diego Novillo
21:27 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Ian Lance Taylor
20:22 Re: GCC porting tutorials Bernd Schmidt
20:17 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Joe Buck
18:34 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Toon Moene
18:03 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Janek Kozicki
17:22 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Gerald Pfeifer
16:58 Widening multiplications (was: Re: GCC porting tutorials) Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:56 Re: redundant divmodsi4 not optimized away Greg McGary
15:56 gcc dependency on unsigned mpc releases Brian Gough
14:48 Re: LTO question Diego Novillo
14:26 Re: LTO question Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:58 scheduler dependency bug in the presence of var_location and unspec_volatile Hariharan
13:46 RE: LTO question Bingfeng Mei
13:39 Re: LTO question Dave Korn
13:22 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Ian Lance Taylor
13:11 RE: LTO question Bingfeng Mei
12:59 Re: redundant divmodsi4 not optimized away Michael Matz
12:46 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Aina Niemetz
12:34 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Diego Novillo
09:45 RE: LTO question Bingfeng Mei
09:40 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Janek Kozicki
09:33 Re: LTO question Richard Guenther
09:17 Re: pattern "s<code>_<mode>" not used when generating rtl for float comparison on mips? Paolo Bonzini
08:47 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Janus Weil
08:31 Re: Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Manuel López-Ibáñez
01:47 Re: pattern "s<code>_<mode>" not used when generating rtl for float comparison on mips? Amker.Cheng

April 27, 2010
23:45 Accepted applications for Google Summer of Code 2010 Diego Novillo
22:53 gcc-4.4-20100427 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
22:33 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
21:40 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:33 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
21:27 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
21:20 Re: Plan for gc-improv merge Diego Novillo
21:05 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:45 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
20:43 Re: [LTO] Open items in the ToDo list Diego Novillo
20:38 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
19:56 Re: LTO question Ian Lance Taylor
19:52 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
19:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
18:42 Re: GCC porting tutorials Jonas Paulsson
18:37 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
18:08 Re: redundant divmodsi4 not optimized away Greg McGary
16:46 Thanks GSoC Philip Herron
16:31 LTO question Bingfeng Mei
16:02 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:57 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Dave Korn
14:57 Re: The usage of the "clobber "match_scratch"" Ian Lance Taylor
13:12 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Paolo Bonzini
13:06 Re: pattern "s<code>_<mode>" not used when generating rtl for float comparison on mips? Paolo Bonzini
12:40 The usage of the "clobber "match_scratch"" redriver jiang
12:27 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
11:15 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
09:42 pattern "s<code>_<mode>" not used when generating rtl for float comparison on mips? Amker.Cheng
08:19 Re: LLVM 2.7 Released Eric Botcazou
08:04 LLVM 2.7 Released Chris Lattner
07:57 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing roy rosen
07:50 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Paolo Bonzini
07:18 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Manuel López-Ibáñez
05:10 Re: redundant divmodsi4 not optimized away Ian Lance Taylor
04:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Olivier Galibert
04:46 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
04:02 Re: GCC porting tutorials Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:55 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
03:21 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
03:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
03:02 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
02:58 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
02:56 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
02:16 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
02:03 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
01:46 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Russ Allbery
00:59 redundant divmodsi4 not optimized away Greg McGary

April 26, 2010
23:57 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Dave Korn
22:18 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
21:42 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Toon Moene
21:06 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
20:53 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
20:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
20:03 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
19:53 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:28 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
19:23 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
18:11 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Rainer Emrich
18:04 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
18:00 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
18:00 Re: GCC 4.4.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Rainer Emrich
17:26 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:19 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:15 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
17:14 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
17:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Frank Ch. Eigler
17:03 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
16:59 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Jonathan Corbet
16:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
16:50 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
16:09 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Jonathan Corbet
15:31 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ross Ridge
15:30 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:13 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:12 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Janek Kozicki
15:11 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
15:11 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
15:11 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
15:11 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
15:11 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
14:34 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Pekka Enberg
14:31 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing Richard Guenther
14:15 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Joseph S. Myers
14:01 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Ian Lance Taylor
13:57 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Ian Lance Taylor
13:51 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization David Edelsohn
13:42 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing roy rosen
13:38 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Joakim Tjernlund
13:30 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:27 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:23 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Joakim Tjernlund
12:58 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Janek Kozicki
12:55 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization David Edelsohn
12:54 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Pekka Enberg
12:45 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization David Edelsohn
12:42 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Pekka Enberg
12:37 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:36 Re: cpplib utf8, status? Joseph S. Myers
12:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:28 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
12:23 cpplib utf8, status? Janek Kozicki
12:23 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Joakim Tjernlund
12:20 V4.5 was successfully built on RedHat 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 x86_64 Wenqing Wang
12:16 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
12:13 successfully built 4.5 Wenqing Wang
12:10 Re: GCC porting tutorials Radu Hobincu
11:59 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:48 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:41 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Paolo Bonzini
11:24 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Paolo Bonzini
10:00 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing Richard Guenther
09:46 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Richard Guenther
09:41 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ross Ridge
09:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
09:23 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
09:14 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
09:07 Re: GCC porting tutorials Jonas Paulsson
08:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Andrew Haley
07:57 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Joakim Tjernlund
07:43 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing roy rosen
07:17 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Joakim Tjernlund
05:16 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
05:14 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
05:06 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
04:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Olivier Galibert
04:36 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
04:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
04:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
04:22 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
04:13 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
04:13 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Russ Allbery
04:02 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Ian Lance Taylor
03:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
03:25 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
03:23 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
03:08 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
03:02 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
02:55 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
02:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
02:13 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
02:06 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Dave Korn
01:45 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:37 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
00:30 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Jack Howarth
00:28 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
00:12 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke

April 25, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100425 is now available gccadmin
22:21 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
22:16 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Steven Bosscher
22:16 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
22:08 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Dave Korn
21:46 Re: [LTO] Open items in the ToDo list Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:42 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
21:39 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
21:37 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:36 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
21:35 [LTO] Open items in the ToDo list Andi Hellmund
21:34 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
21:24 Instability in guality testsuite? [was Re: [PATCH,4.6/4.5.1,PR42776] Implement LTO for Windows (PE-COFF) targets.] Dave Korn
21:23 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
21:17 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
21:15 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
21:01 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:41 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Richard Guenther
20:26 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Guenther
19:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
19:49 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
19:37 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Steven Bosscher
19:34 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
19:26 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Richard Guenther
19:19 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Mark Mielke
19:09 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
18:07 Re: PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Ian Lance Taylor
18:06 Re: merging the maverick FPU patches Ian Lance Taylor
18:04 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Ian Lance Taylor
17:58 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
17:36 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
17:35 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
17:16 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
17:09 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:08 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
17:05 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
17:05 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
17:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
16:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:48 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
16:35 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
16:34 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
16:30 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
16:26 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
16:18 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
16:00 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
16:00 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
15:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:44 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
15:34 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Jonathan Corbet
15:21 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Denys Vlasenko
15:20 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) H.J. Lu
15:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
14:59 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:55 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
13:10 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ralf Wildenhues
13:05 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
13:01 PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization Joakim Tjernlund
12:54 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
12:43 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Eric Botcazou
11:28 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
11:25 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Toon Moene
11:07 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ralf Wildenhues
10:56 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Leif Ekblad
09:47 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:40 merging the maverick FPU patches Martin Guy
04:20 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner
04:19 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Chris Lattner

April 24, 2010
22:55 __builtin_choose_expr: type-genericity and side-effects Jörg Leis
22:54 gcc-4.6-20100424 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:19 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
21:40 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joel Sherrill
21:27 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Andi Hellmund
21:03 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:46 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Martin Guy
20:45 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:43 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:39 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Guenther
20:37 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Guenther
20:37 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:28 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Steven Bosscher
20:23 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:03 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
19:48 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joel Sherrill
19:47 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Florian Weimer
19:43 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joel Sherrill
19:36 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Thomas Neumann
19:07 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Leif Ekblad
18:30 Documentation legal issues (Was: Re: Poor internal documentation) Joern Rennecke
18:24 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Gerald Pfeifer
18:21 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Gerald Pfeifer
18:12 Re: mirror proposition Gerald Pfeifer
18:11 Re: Stepping down as SPU backend maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
18:07 Re: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Richard Guenther
18:05 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Laurent GUERBY
16:45 Re: RFC: merging GUPC into the GCC trunk? Gerald Pfeifer
16:27 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joel Sherrill
16:02 Re: GCC porting tutorials Bernd Roesch
16:00 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:01 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) ÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÐ
14:45 Re: GCC porting tutorials Ian Lance Taylor
14:40 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:39 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:34 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
14:31 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:23 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:21 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:14 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:53 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Toon Moene
13:48 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:29 lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_merge_decls_1, at lto-symtab.c:549 Toon Moene
13:20 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
13:02 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
12:56 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
12:51 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
12:35 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Matthew J Fletcher
12:12 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ross Ridge
11:33 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joseph S. Myers
11:10 Re: GSoC application Artem Shinkarov
10:51 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Andi Hellmund
10:39 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) PaweÅ Sikora
10:26 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Eric Botcazou
09:49 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:19 Re: GCC porting tutorials Michael Hope
09:17 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Jonathan Wakely
09:05 Re: GCC porting tutorials Sergio Ruocco
08:53 GCC porting tutorials Radu Hobincu
06:02 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Veksler
05:14 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
05:08 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
02:13 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
02:09 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
01:39 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Tim Prince
01:39 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
01:37 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Dave Korn
01:35 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
01:32 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
01:00 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
00:48 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joe Buck
00:47 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Ian Lance Taylor
00:41 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Basile Starynkevitch
00:37 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Basile Starynkevitch
00:35 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:21 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joe Buck
00:08 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Basile Starynkevitch
00:05 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Basile Starynkevitch
00:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Basile Starynkevitch

April 23, 2010
23:20 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joe Buck
22:53 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
22:35 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:18 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
22:18 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Alfred M. Szmidt
22:06 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
22:01 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Russ Allbery
21:49 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
21:45 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
21:36 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:19 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Basile Starynkevitch
21:05 Re: Passing options down to assembler and linker Jean Christophe Beyler
20:59 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:57 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Florian Weimer
20:51 Re: GSoC application Tobias Grosser
20:44 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
20:43 Re: GSoC application Ian Lance Taylor
20:42 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:36 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:32 Re: aliasing warnings Ian Lance Taylor
20:24 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:24 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) PaweÅ Sikora
20:22 GSoC application Artem Shinkarov
20:19 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
20:14 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:06 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) HyperQuantum
20:03 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:58 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) HyperQuantum
19:53 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Michael Witten
19:48 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Joel Sherrill
19:45 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Marc Glisse
19:40 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:34 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) David Daney
19:24 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) ÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÐ
19:04 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Richard Kenner
18:56 Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC) Paolo Carlini
18:40 Why not contribute? (to GCC) Manuel López-Ibáñez
18:11 Re: O2 and Overflow Heinz Riener
18:09 Re: Passing options down to assembler and linker Nathan Froyd
18:07 Re: Passing options down to assembler and linker David Daney
17:55 Passing options down to assembler and linker Jean Christophe Beyler
17:45 Re: O2 and Overflow Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:36 Re: O2 and Overflow Andrew Pinski
17:33 Re: O2 and Overflow Kai Tietz
17:27 O2 and Overflow Heinz Riener
15:57 Re: --enable-plugin as default? Jack Howarth
15:43 Re: --enable-plugin as default? Diego Novillo
15:23 aliasing warnings Eduard Hasenleithner
14:26 Re: static linking on Cygwin Doug Semler
14:24 Re: Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:08 Re: --enable-plugin as default? Duncan Sands
14:01 Re: --enable-plugin as default? Basile Starynkevitch
14:00 Re: --enable-plugin as default? Richard Guenther
13:50 --enable-plugin as default? Jack Howarth
13:05 Re: Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Philipp Thomas
12:12 Re: How to report an ICE in -flto? Richard Guenther
12:00 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing Richard Guenther
11:24 How to report an ICE in -flto? Adrian von Bidder
09:35 Fwd: static linking on Cygwin Janus Weil
08:01 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Manuel López-Ibáñez
05:03 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Dave Korn
04:47 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations tbp
04:11 Re: Code assistance with GCC Miles Bader
03:29 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Dave Korn
02:01 Re: Code assistance with GCC Michael Witten

April 22, 2010
23:03 gcc-4.5-20100422 is now available gccadmin
18:48 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
18:44 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Rainer Orth
18:44 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
18:42 Linux Plumbers Conference 2010 Call for Tracks Elena Zannoni
18:42 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Rainer Orth
18:42 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Rainer Orth
17:29 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:50 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Xinliang David Li
16:22 Re: Code assistance with GCC Chris Lattner
16:04 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing roy rosen
15:52 Re: unnecessary --enable-plugin tests Jack Howarth
15:12 Re: unnecessary --enable-plugin tests Richard Guenther
15:08 Re: unnecessary --enable-plugin tests Jack Howarth
14:51 GCC 4.4.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
14:38 Re: unnecessary --enable-plugin tests Ian Lance Taylor
14:31 unnecessary --enable-plugin tests Jack Howarth
13:23 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
12:16 logos digitizing Madams/Sirs Helen
11:29 Re: Code assistance with GCC Jakub Jelinek
10:24 RE: branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
09:32 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Laurent GUERBY
09:18 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Marc Glisse
09:03 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Laurent GUERBY
08:42 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Steven Bosscher
08:38 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Rainer Orth
08:31 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Dave Korn
08:16 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Kai Ruottu
07:25 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Dave Korn
07:08 Re: PR43839 almost fixed Dave Korn
06:50 Re: gcc-4.5.0 prerequisites alternate libelf Ryan Hill
06:30 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations tbp
06:29 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations tbp
06:19 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
06:06 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
05:39 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
05:23 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Xinliang David Li
04:38 Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations Paolo Carlini
02:31 g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogations tbp
02:26 PR43839 almost fixed Jack Howarth
01:41 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
01:23 Re: Code assistance with GCC Chris Lattner

April 21, 2010
23:39 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
23:10 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
22:49 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Eric Christopher
22:45 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
22:36 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Andreas Schwab
20:58 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Jonathan Wakely
20:58 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Toon Moene
20:54 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Jack Howarth
20:54 Proje hazırlama, Yönetim ve İzleme Tek nikleri Semineri PGlobal Küresel Danışmanlık ve
20:52 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
20:51 Re: Code assistance with GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:12 Re: ICE: -flto and -g Richard Guenther
19:35 Re: ICE: -flto and -g Duncan Sands
19:28 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Duncan Sands
19:24 Re: Combine or peephole? Jeff Law
19:07 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Jonathan Wakely
19:03 ICE: -flto and -g Adrian von Bidder
18:46 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Eric Botcazou
18:41 gcc-4.5.0 prerequisites alternate libelf Donald Parsons
18:40 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
18:37 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
18:32 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Basile Starynkevitch
18:28 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
18:25 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
18:23 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Chris Lattner
18:19 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
18:19 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
18:10 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
18:09 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
18:04 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
18:01 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
18:01 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
18:01 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
18:01 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Steven Bosscher
18:00 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Duncan Sands
17:57 Re: Combine or peephole? Frank Isamov
17:55 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Paolo Bonzini
17:51 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:49 Re: Code assistance with GCC Andrew Haley
17:42 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Chris Lattner
17:42 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
17:37 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
17:35 Re: Code assistance with GCC Chris Lattner
17:23 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Steven Bosscher
17:21 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:17 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
17:15 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:10 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
17:10 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
17:09 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
17:05 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Steven Bosscher
17:00 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Steven Bosscher
16:57 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Robert Dewar
16:52 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Mark Mitchell
16:52 Re: Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
16:49 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Joe Buck
15:52 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Paolo Bonzini
15:46 Re: Code assistance with GCC Basile Starynkevitch
15:18 Re: Combine or peephole? Jeff Law
15:07 Re: Combine or peephole? Steven Bosscher
14:47 Re: Combine or peephole? Ian Lance Taylor
14:22 Re: Code assistance with GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:32 Re: Code assistance with GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
12:10 Re: Are non-DECL_COMDAT nodes in same_comdat_group lists OK? Jakub Jelinek
11:53 Are non-DECL_COMDAT nodes in same_comdat_group lists OK? Martin Jambor
11:12 Re: Code assistance with GCC Basile Starynkevitch
10:33 Code assistance with GCC Tomohiro Matsuyama
06:42 Re: Combine or peephole? Frank Isamov
02:05 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Dave Korn

April 20, 2010
23:43 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Andrew Pinski
23:39 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Dave Korn
22:58 gcc-4.4-20100420 is now available gccadmin
18:20 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Nathan Froyd
18:03 RE: branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
12:26 Re: Plan for gc-improv merge Laurynas Biveinis
09:11 Re: Plan for gc-improv merge Richard Guenther
08:23 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:44 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Dave Korn

April 19, 2010
21:37 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Justin P. Mattock
21:17 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Jonathan Wakely
21:14 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jonathan Wakely
17:34 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Basile Starynkevitch
16:31 Re: Plan for gc-improv merge Laurynas Biveinis
16:06 Re: Plan for gc-improv merge Basile Starynkevitch
14:54 Re: Combine or peephole? Jeff Law
14:44 Plan for gc-improv merge Laurynas Biveinis
14:31 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Mark Mitchell
13:49 Re: finding an original typedef decl from a reference IainS
13:36 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Jack Howarth
13:19 Re: finding an original typedef decl from a reference Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:09 Re: finding an original typedef decl from a reference Richard Guenther
13:03 finding an original typedef decl from a reference IainS
12:58 Combine or peephole? Frank Isamov
12:57 Re: Is this maybe PR43776 again? Jakub Jelinek
09:23 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Basile Starynkevitch
08:50 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Richard Guenther
07:20 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Justin P. Mattock
06:58 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Jie Zhang
06:43 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Justin P. Mattock
05:35 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Ben Gamari
05:25 Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Jie Zhang
05:03 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Released Basile Starynkevitch
04:19 gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error Justin Mattock
00:55 Is this maybe PR43776 again? Dave Korn

April 18, 2010
23:01 GCC 4.5.0 Released Mark Mitchell
22:46 gcc-4.3-20100418 is now available gccadmin
04:19 Re: Question on the testsuite. Vaivaswatha N

April 17, 2010
22:46 gcc-4.6-20100417 is now available gccadmin
17:50 Re: Question on the testsuite. Ian Lance Taylor
16:34 Question on the testsuite. Vaivaswatha N
11:51 Re: Question about perl while bootstrapping gcc Alexey Salmin
00:07 Re: Question about perl while bootstrapping gcc Jim Wilson

April 16, 2010
21:20 Re: LIM/Alias Analysis performance issue Richard Guenther
21:19 Re: LIM/Alias Analysis performance issue Richard Guenther
21:18 Re: LIM/Alias Analysis performance issue Andrew Pinski
20:21 (Fortran) Coarrays in GCC - library/build questions, RFC & announcement Tobias Burnus
19:01 Re: On the use of abort() in the testsuite IainS
18:54 Re: Question about perl while bootstrapping gcc Alan Lehotsky
18:10 Question about perl while bootstrapping gcc Dominique Dhumieres
17:40 LIM/Alias Analysis performance issue Lu, John
17:15 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
16:51 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:54 gcc-4.6-20100416 is now available gccadmin
12:36 Re: What is this check error? Dave Korn
11:22 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
04:48 What is this check error? H.J. Lu

April 15, 2010
22:54 gcc-4.5-20100415 is now available gccadmin
20:52 Re: branch probabilities on multiway branches Jan Hubicka
16:59 Ask for mentor of "EFI extension of Binutils" at GNU of GSoC b95705030
14:54 RE: branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
14:14 RE: branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
12:25 Re: GCC 4.5 and DragonEgg Richard Guenther
12:17 GCC 4.5 and DragonEgg Amine Khaldi
12:15 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Andrew Haley
12:07 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Steven Bosscher
12:03 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Andrew Haley
11:57 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Basile Starynkevitch
11:56 Re: branch probabilities on multiway branches Steven Bosscher
11:11 RE: branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
10:12 Re: svn repository for gcc Jonathan Wakely
09:05 svn repository for gcc Singh, Neeraj K
09:04 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:38 Re: Target hook definition licensing problems (GPL vs GFDL) Joern Rennecke
08:26 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Manuel López-Ibáñez

April 14, 2010
21:34 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Basile Starynkevitch
21:04 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:02 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Nathan Froyd
20:46 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Ian Lance Taylor
20:43 Re: On the use of abort() in the testsuite Ian Lance Taylor
20:31 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Toon Moene
19:52 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Toon Moene
19:48 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Basile Starynkevitch
19:42 On the use of abort() in the testsuite IainS
19:19 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Ian Lance Taylor
18:49 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Tom Tromey
18:30 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Toon Moene
16:06 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Richard Guenther
15:57 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Diego Novillo
15:50 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Richard Guenther
15:44 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Nathan Froyd
15:36 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Duncan Sands
15:30 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Diego Novillo
15:21 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Steven Bosscher
15:19 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:58 Update git mirror with proper branches? H.J. Lu
14:34 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Steven Bosscher
14:24 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
14:06 Re: Viewvc perms problem ? Dave Korn
14:02 RE: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Grigori Fursin
13:59 Re: Viewvc perms problem ? Frank Ch. Eigler
13:54 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
13:36 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
13:18 Viewvc perms problem ? Dave Korn
12:12 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:01 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Richard Guenther
11:45 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Diego Novillo
11:44 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Martin Jambor
11:31 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Richard Guenther
11:12 GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2010-04-14) Richard Guenther
11:07 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Diego Novillo
09:29 Re: vectorization, scheduling and aliasing Richard Guenther
08:40 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Richard Guenther
06:48 vectorization, scheduling and aliasing roy rosen
06:24 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
01:04 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:08 Re: -fexceptions introduces ABI incompatibility of sorts (was: RE: Re[2]: [Gc] On cancellation, GC_thread_exit_proc is never called) Ian Lance Taylor

April 13, 2010
23:43 Re: branch probabilities on multiway branches Jan Hubicka
23:11 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
22:57 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
22:52 gcc-4.4-20100413 is now available gccadmin
22:28 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.8 is released H.J. Lu
22:15 -fexceptions introduces ABI incompatibility of sorts (was: RE: Re[2]: [Gc] On cancellation, GC_thread_exit_proc is never called) Boehm, Hans
21:16 Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? Eric Botcazou
21:06 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Diego Novillo
21:04 Testing GCC on Cygwin made substantially easier [was Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc?] Dave Korn
20:52 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
20:29 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Eric Botcazou
20:19 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Diego Novillo
19:47 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Sebastian Pop
19:43 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Sebastian Pop
19:43 Re: Copy assignments for non scalar types Jakub Jelinek
19:28 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
19:26 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
19:21 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Andrew Pinski
19:19 Re: specs question. IainS
19:16 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
18:14 Copy assignments for non scalar types Sebastian Pop
18:05 Re: specs question. Peter O'Gorman
17:22 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
17:18 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
17:15 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
17:05 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
16:58 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
16:51 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
16:33 branch probabilities on multiway branches Rahul Kharche
15:34 Re: fixed-point support in c++ Dave Korn
15:06 Re: fixed-point support in c++ Sean D'Epagnier
11:53 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Richard Guenther
11:35 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:57 RE: Release novops attribute for external use? Bingfeng Mei
10:25 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Richard Guenther
10:23 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Richard Guenther
10:15 RE: Release novops attribute for external use? Bingfeng Mei
09:56 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Andrew Haley
09:45 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Richard Guenther
08:55 RE: Release novops attribute for external use? Bingfeng Mei
00:01 Re: specs question. IainS

April 12, 2010
23:44 Re: specs question. Ian Lance Taylor
23:30 Re: specs question. IainS
23:26 Re: post linker phase - How To? Ian Lance Taylor
23:22 Re: specs question. Ian Lance Taylor
22:51 Re: post linker phase - How To? IainS
22:41 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Ian Lance Taylor
22:35 Re: specs question. IainS
22:30 Re: post linker phase - How To? Ian Lance Taylor
22:25 Re: specs question. Ian Lance Taylor
22:17 Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? DJ Delorie
21:13 Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? Eric Botcazou
21:08 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Toon Moene
20:53 Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? DJ Delorie
20:05 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:54 Re: Is nonoverlapping_memrefs_p wrong for unknown offsets? Steven Bosscher
19:12 post linker phase - How To? IainS
18:35 Re: Error while building GCC 4.5 (MinGW) Dave Korn
18:29 Re: Deprecation of -I- and -iquote Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
18:28 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Dave Korn
18:10 Re: GCC-TM dependency build Richard Henderson
18:05 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Andrew Haley
18:03 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Dave Korn
17:58 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Dave Korn
17:44 RE: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Weddington, Eric
17:41 Re: Error while building GCC 4.5 (MinGW) Jim Wilson
17:39 Re: Is nonoverlapping_memrefs_p wrong for unknown offsets? Mat Hostetter
17:18 Re: Is nonoverlapping_memrefs_p wrong for unknown offsets? Steven Bosscher
17:04 Re: Deprecation of -I- and -iquote Tom Tromey
17:03 missing plugin headers Jack Howarth
16:58 Is nonoverlapping_memrefs_p wrong for unknown offsets? Mat Hostetter
16:56 Re: Release novops attribute for external use? Andrew Haley
16:27 Release novops attribute for external use? Bingfeng Mei
16:03 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
15:59 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
15:46 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
15:34 Re: Error while building GCC 4.5 (MinGW) Name lastlong
15:22 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
15:03 Re: i386 SSE Test Question Joel Sherrill
15:00 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Alfred M. Szmidt
14:57 Re: i386 SSE Test Question H.J. Lu
14:56 Re: i386 SSE Test Question Nathan Froyd
14:47 Re: i386 SSE Test Question Joel Sherrill
14:27 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:05 Re: i386 SSE Test Question Richard Guenther
14:00 i386 SSE Test Question Joel Sherrill
14:00 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Dave Korn
13:52 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
13:42 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Richard Guenther
13:38 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Robert Dewar
13:35 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
07:34 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
06:48 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Manuel López-Ibáñez

April 11, 2010
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100411 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jonathan Wakely
22:19 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Dave Korn
21:43 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:58 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Eric Botcazou
20:46 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
20:25 Re: GSoC 2010 Project Idea Dorit Nuzman
19:38 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Chris Lattner
19:06 RE: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Grigori Fursin
18:50 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Laurent GUERBY
18:27 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Toon Moene
18:15 Re: Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Chris Lattner
17:49 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Andi Kleen
17:47 specs question. IainS
16:37 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Robert Dewar
16:34 RE: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Grigori Fursin
16:33 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
16:32 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Dave Korn
16:31 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Basile Starynkevitch
16:28 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Robert Dewar
16:26 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
16:26 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Robert Dewar
16:20 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
16:17 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
16:02 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
16:02 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Robert Dewar
15:56 RE: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Grigori Fursin
15:41 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Robert Dewar
15:36 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
15:24 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:06 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
14:57 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? David Edelsohn
14:33 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Eric Botcazou
14:30 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
14:17 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
14:01 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
12:54 Notes from the GROW'10 workshop panel (GCC research opportunities workshop) Dorit Nuzman
11:19 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
02:28 Deprecation of -I- and -iquote Rodolfo Lima

April 10, 2010
13:37 Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? Eric Botcazou
13:03 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Duncan Sands
11:02 Re: may_be_unaligned_p bug? Eric Botcazou
02:48 may_be_unaligned_p bug? DJ Delorie

April 09, 2010
22:16 Re: GCC-TM dependency build Jonathan Wakely
18:59 Re: GCC documentation: info format Jim Wilson
18:18 Re: Error while building GCC 4.5 (MinGW) Jim Wilson
18:16 Re: GCC documentation: info format Jim Wilson
16:52 Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? Basile Starynkevitch
16:44 Re: lower subreg optimization Jim Wilson
16:37 dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
16:00 Re: GCC-TM dependency build Richard Henderson
12:59 Re: GCC documentation: info format Diego Novillo
12:09 GCC documentation: info format christophe . jarry
12:00 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
09:58 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
09:51 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
08:22 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Richard Guenther
07:49 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Paolo Bonzini
06:41 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Eric Botcazou
04:12 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Tim Prince
04:08 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Dave Korn
02:50 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Gary Funck
01:06 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Dave Korn
00:24 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Tim Prince

April 08, 2010
22:57 gcc-4.5-20100408 is now available gccadmin
22:01 Coleção Outono / Iverno 2010 !! jocalcados at jocalcadosnet do
21:21 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Dave Korn
21:21 GSoC idea : Implementing a C Compiler for EFI Byte Code using GCC b95705030
19:04 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
18:53 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Xinliang David Li
18:37 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
18:34 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
18:31 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
18:30 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
18:28 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
18:15 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
18:10 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
18:08 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Jan Hubicka
17:55 GSoC idea =?big5?b?oVg=?= Implementing a C Compiler for EFI Byte Code using GCC b95705030
17:39 Making BB Reorder Smarter for -Os Ian Bolton
16:51 Re: [alpha] Wrong code produced at -Os, -O2, and -O3 Matt Turner
14:33 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
14:32 Re: Subversion Status Andrew John Hughes
14:21 Error while building GCC 4.5 (MinGW) Name lastlong
13:29 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Richard Guenther
13:25 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Basile Starynkevitch
13:13 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Diego Novillo
11:56 Re: why mult generated for unsigned int multiply on mips? Robert Dewar
10:54 Re: why mult generated for unsigned int multiply on mips? Amker.Cheng
10:38 Re: WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Richard Guenther
10:32 WHOPR bootstrap, when/how? Steven Bosscher
09:11 Posao ZipEurope
09:06 Re: Subversion Status Manuel López-Ibáñez
06:16 Re: [alpha] Wrong code produced at -Os, -O2, and -O3 Uros Bizjak
05:48 Re: lower subreg optimization roy rosen

April 07, 2010
21:52 Subversion Status Andrew John Hughes
21:08 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Laurent GUERBY
18:47 Re: GCC primary/secondary platforms? Tim Prince
18:38 [alpha] Wrong code produced at -Os, -O2, and -O3 Matt Turner
16:32 Re: why mult generated for unsigned int multiply on mips? Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:17 GCC primary/secondary platforms? Gary Funck
15:11 Re: RFC: merging GUPC into the GCC trunk? Diego Novillo
15:05 RFC: merging GUPC into the GCC trunk? Gary Funck
12:42 Re: compiler operations research roy rosen
11:58 Re: compiler operations research Dave Korn
11:29 compiler operations research roy rosen
08:32 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Richard Guenther
07:46 Re: VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Alexandre Oliva
07:05 Re: why mult generated for unsigned int multiply on mips? Amker.Cheng
06:46 why mult generated for unsigned int multiply on mips? Amker.Cheng
02:10 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Robert Dewar

April 06, 2010
23:19 gcc-4.4-20100406 is now available gccadmin
23:16 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jerome Quinn
21:11 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jonathan Wakely
21:02 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jerome Quinn
20:30 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Laurent GUERBY
20:27 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jonathan Wakely
20:10 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jerome Quinn
19:30 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Marc Glisse
19:23 Re: lower subreg optimization Joseph S. Myers
19:05 Re: lower subreg optimization Nathan Froyd
19:03 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Joe Buck
18:58 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jerome Quinn
18:55 Re: lower subreg optimization Ian Lance Taylor
18:29 Re: Bad behavior of ce1 on arm Eric Botcazou
18:26 Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Rainer Orth
17:27 Re: lower subreg optimization Steven Bosscher
17:13 Re: lower subreg optimization Nathan Froyd
16:58 Re: lower subreg optimization Ian Lance Taylor
16:52 Re: Help with an Wierd Error Jim Wilson
16:45 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Chris Lattner
16:37 Re: lower subreg optimization Jim Wilson
16:29 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:24 Re: GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Jack Howarth
16:20 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Joe Buck
16:00 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Chris Lattner
15:31 Re: VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Jakub Jelinek
15:23 Re: VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Jeff Law
15:11 Re: GCC 4.5 Branch Created Jason Merrill
13:45 GCC 4.5.0 release candidate available Richard Guenther
13:40 Re: GCC 4.5 Branch Created Kirill A. Shutemov
13:38 Re: Where can I put the optimization of got for arm back end at? Carrot Wei
12:38 Bad behavior of ce1 on arm Sergey Grechanik
12:16 GCC 4.5 Branch Created Jakub Jelinek
09:24 lower subreg optimization roy rosen
08:49 Re: Processing global static (or const) variables Richard Guenther
06:36 Re: VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Jakub Jelinek
03:50 Re: Processing global static (or const) variables Ehren Metcalfe
02:29 Problem on handling fall-through edge in bb-reorder Amker.Cheng

April 05, 2010
23:18 Re: VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Jeff Law
20:33 Re: VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Alexandre Oliva
19:54 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Chris Lattner
19:51 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Benjamin Kosnik
19:44 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Benjamin Kosnik
18:59 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:24 Re: RFC: c++ diagnostics Chris Lattner
16:37 VTA/debugging vs reload-v2 Jeff Law
15:38 Re: Vanilla cross compiling and libstdc++v3 Dave Korn
15:20 RFC: c++ diagnostics Benjamin Kosnik
15:17 Re: Vanilla cross compiling and libstdc++v3 Dave Korn
15:17 Re: Vanilla cross compiling and libstdc++v3 Nathan Froyd
14:59 Vanilla cross compiling and libstdc++v3 Kofi Doku Atuah
14:20 Re: Processing global static (or const) variables Richard Guenther
13:50 Processing global static (or const) variables Ehren Metcalfe
12:23 Re: how to "parse" gcc -v output Dave Korn

April 04, 2010
23:27 gcc-4.3-20100404 is now available gccadmin
19:09 Re: how to "parse" gcc -v output Joseph S. Myers
14:06 Re: State of the mercurial mirror Thomas Capricelli
10:16 Re: how to "parse" gcc -v output Ralf Wildenhues
09:40 Re: how to "parse" gcc -v output Joseph S. Myers
07:06 how to "parse" gcc -v output Ralf Wildenhues
06:49 Re: Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Amker.Cheng

April 03, 2010
01:56 Re: About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 Tadashi Koike
01:48 Re: About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 Tadashi Koike
00:36 Re: gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? Allan McRae

April 02, 2010
23:17 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Jack Howarth
19:16 Re: 8x compilation time increase after r157834 Richard Guenther
19:11 Re: 8x compilation time increase after r157834 Roman Kononov
18:50 Re: 8x compilation time increase after r157834 Richard Guenther
18:47 8x compilation time increase after r157834 Roman Kononov
18:05 Help with an Wierd Error Balaji.Iyer
17:34 Re: question about copy right assignment form David Edelsohn
17:28 Re: gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? Roman Kononov
17:14 site.exp and newlib_ldflags Joel Sherrill
17:10 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Jonathan Wakely
14:41 Re: Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Steven Bosscher
14:26 Re: Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Jeff Law
13:12 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Jack Howarth
12:15 Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts Paolo Carlini
12:09 default_weaktoshared timeouts Jack Howarth
11:26 Re: Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Steven Bosscher
10:41 Fwd: Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Amker.Cheng
09:43 Re: Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Steven Bosscher
09:29 Puzzle about CFG on rtl during delay slot schedule Amker.Cheng
05:56 Re: State of the mercurial mirror Thomas Capricelli
04:06 Re: Where can I put the optimization of got for arm back end at? Carrot Wei
03:56 question about copy right assignment form Michael Han
03:43 Re: Unexpected output constraints Daniel Jacobowitz

April 01, 2010
23:32 gcc-4.5-20100401 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Re: Unexpected output constraints Bernd Schmidt
22:09 Re: Unexpected output constraints Daniel Jacobowitz
22:06 Re: Unexpected output constraints Bernd Schmidt
21:54 Unexpected output constraints Daniel Jacobowitz
20:31 Re: Where can I put the optimization of got for arm back end at? Steven Bosscher
19:13 Re: State of the mercurial mirror Frank Ch. Eigler
18:35 Re: Diego Novillo appointed Plugins Reviewer Diego Novillo
18:11 Re: Where can I put the optimization of got for arm back end at? Andrew Haley
18:10 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
16:38 Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Ralf Wildenhues
16:21 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Paolo Bonzini
16:13 RE: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Arthur Haas
15:09 Re: State of the mercurial mirror Thomas Capricelli
14:48 Re: State of the mercurial mirror Frank Ch. Eigler
14:43 Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Rainer Orth
14:38 RE: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Arthur Haas
14:29 Re: State of the mercurial mirror Rainer Orth
14:24 Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Rainer Orth
14:23 Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 H.J. Lu
14:14 Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Art Haas
12:35 Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO Richard Guenther


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3