This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins?
- From: Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com>
- To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:52:00 +0100
- Subject: Re: status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins?
- References: <4B9B886B.email@example.com>
2010/3/13 Basile Starynkevitch <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> b. the plugin invocation convention could be improved. In particular, one
> could have (as it is the case of many other major plugin-ehancable software,
> e.g. Mozilla, Qt, Gtk, ...) a specific directory to install plugins, and
> invoke gcc -fplugin=treehydra instead of gcc
> -fplugin=/some/distribution/specific/path/to/treehydra.so ; I did propose a
> patch for that http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00353.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00476.html but nobody really
> cares :-( Would it be appropriate to issue a ping^5 for it?
Sure. I'd say it's unlikely that a review of that patch would jump out
of nowhere now, so ping away.