Re: RTX costs

["Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos at gmail dot com>]

Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Quoting "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After reading the internal docs about rtx_costs I am left wondering
> > what they exactly are estimating.
> > - Are they estimating in the beginning of expand how many insns will be
> > generated from a particular insn until the assembler is generated?
> > - or Are they estimating how many assembler instructions will be
> > generated for a particular insn?
> > - or something else?
>
> When optimizing for speed, they estimate execution cycles, when
> optimizing for space, they estimate code size.  In each case,
> normalized so that COSTS_N_INSNS (1) is equivalent to the cost of
> a simple instruction.  Or at least that's the theoretical goal.
> Individual ports might deviate from that for historical and/or
> practical reasons.

Thanks for the reply. The name of the macro COSTS_N_INSNS was making me 
think I was estimating numbers of insns instead of number of assembler 
instructions even though when optimising for size the latter makes more 
sense.