This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: aliases without a _DECL?


> On 02/05/2010 05:56 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> But without the DECLs there would be absolutely no way to reffer to these
>> within current unit, so I guess cgraph don't need to care about them much
>> (i.e. they can just be some list assigned to node or decl).
>
> Right, they would just be for binary compatibility.
>
>> But then I don't see how this will work with LTO, so it seems that creating
>> real aliases should work better?
>
> Yeah, I suppose it's a rare enough issue that I might as well use the  
> normal process.

Java is producing aliases for pretty much everything, so the normal process
should be ready to scale to quite few aliases ;)

Honza
>
> Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]