This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Joshua Haberman <jhaberman at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:21:01 +0000
Subject: Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
References: <loom.20100103T063932-636@post.gmane.org> <84fc9c001001030253g4911a5ebi97aab621b7505449@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/03/2010 10:53 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> GCC follows its own documentation here, not some random
> websites and maybe not the strict reading of the standard.

GCC is compatible with C99 in this regard.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
  - From: Joshua Haberman

References:
- GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
  - From: Joshua Haberman
- Re: GCC aliasing rules: more aggressive than C99?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]